Version 2.0 of the individual style of conducting classes by an academic teacher in the context of contemporary changes and trends in education

• Autorzy: Andrzej Rozmus , Olga Kurek-Ochmańska
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The vast majority of contemporary students are people born after 1995. This generation is defined in journalistic publications, as well as in the sociological literature, as the generation "Z" (the term generation "C" is also used and has been coined from the English words "connect, communicate, change"). This generation has come to know, love and embrace modern technologies and together with the generation "Y" (people born between 1980 and 1995) they create the generation of so-called digital natives (Sajduk, 2015, p. 17). These days, they are the "native speakers" of the digital language (Prensky, 2001, p. 2). Young people, in order to communicate, in a natural way and without further instructions, use the internet, mobile devices and social media, where they create personalized networks of friends, colleagues and similarity groups (Pew Research Center, 2014, pp. 5-6). The omnipresent e-environment and people's constant interaction with it caused that students from the generation Y, and especially Z, think and process information in a different way than their predecessors. The issue has become one of areas of the interest of neuroeducation (also referred to as - mind, brain and education or MBE). This fast-growing field of science, brings together neurobiologists, neuropsychologists, psychiatrists conducting clinical research, logicians, mathematicians, physicists, cybernetics and computer scientists, who deal with neural networks and artificial intelligence, as well as educators, sociologists, linguists, philosophers and cultural anthropologists (Juszczyk, 2012, p. 40). Their task is to examine the optimal teaching and learning process from the perspective of brainwork, through the exploration of interactions between biological processes and education. This area of interest of neuroeducation, also includes the issue of the impact of modern technologies on teaching and learning processes (Hon Wah, Chi-Hung, 2013). (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Web 2.0; Students; Education; High-tech; Learning process

PL

Web 2.0; Studenci; Edukacja; Nowe technologie; Proces uczenia się

• Czasopismo: e-mentor
• Rocznik: 2018
• Numer: nr 2
• Strony: 4--9

Twórcy

autor

Andrzej Rozmus

• University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszów, Poland

autor

Olga Kurek-Ochmańska

• University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszów, Poland

Bibliografia

• Adair, J. (2000). Anatomia biznesu. Motywacja, Warsaw: StudioEMKA.
• Bauerlein, M. (2001). The dumbest generation: how the digital age stupefies young Americans and jeopardizes our future. New York: Tarcher/Penguin.
• Bauman, Z. (2006). Płynna nowoczesność. Cracow: Wydawnictwo Literackie.
• Beckman, K., Bennett, S., Lockyer, L. (2013). Understanding students' use and value of technology for learning. Media and Technology, vol. 39, 346-367. DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2013.878353.
• Bereźnicki, F. (2009). Zagadnienia dydaktyki szkoły wyższej. Szczecin: Wydawnictwo WSH TWP.
• Berk, R.A. (2010). How do you leverage the latest technologies, including Web 2.0 tools, in your classroom? International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 6(1), 1-13. Retrieved from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.463.3712&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
• Busso, D., Pollack, S. (2014). No brain left behind: consequences of neuroscience discourse for education. Learning, Media and Technology, Vol. 40, 168-186. DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2014.908908.
• Day, C. (2008). Nauczyciel z pasją. Jak zachować entuzjazm i zaangażowanie w pracy. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
• Cole, J., Suman, M., Schramm, P., Lunn, R. et al. (2015). The 2015 Digital Future Report. Surveying the Digital Future. Year Thirteen. Retrieved from: http://www.digitalcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/2015-Digital-Future-Report.pdf.
• enGauge 21st Century Skills: Literacy in the Digital Age, (2003). Retrieved from: https://pict.sdsu.edu/engauge21st.pdf.
• Filipiak, E. (2012). Rozwijanie zdolności uczenia się. Z Wygotskim i Brunerem w tle. Sopot: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
• Fransen, J. (2012). Teaming up for learning: Team effectiveness in collaborative learning in higher education. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268981454_Teaming_up_for_learning_Team_effectiveness_in_collaborative_learning_in_higher_education.
• Hon Wah, L., Chi-Hung, J. (2013). What Can Cognitive Neuroscience Do to Enhance Our Understanding of Education and Learning? Journal of Neuro science and Neuro engineering, vol. 2, 393-399. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257186003_What_Can_Cognitive_Neuroscience_Do_to_Enhance_Our_Understanding_of_Education_and_Learning.
• Jankowski, M. (2013). Grywalizacja - wykorzystanie elementów gier do modyfikowania zachowań ludzi. Nauki Społeczne, 2(8), 139-155. Retrieved from: https://bit.ly/2MCtYqd.
• Juszczyk, S. (2012). Neuronauki w edukacji: nowe możliwości w procesie nauczania-uczenia się. Chowanna 2, 39-57. Retrieved from: http://bazhum.muzhp.pl/media//files/Chowanna/Chowanna-r2012-t2/Chowanna-r2012-t2-s39-57/Chowanna-r2012-t2-s39-57.pdf.
• Nęcki, Z. (2000). Komunikacja międzyludzka. Cracow: Wydawnictwo Antykwa.
• Piecuch, A. (2016). Nowe media, nowe problemy. Dydaktyka Informatyki, 11, 109-116. DOI: 10.15584/di.2016.11.14
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon University Press, Vol. 9, No. 5, 2-15. Retrieved from: http://www.albertomattiacci.it/docs/did/Digital_Natives_Digital_Immigrants.pdf.
• Pervin, L.A. (2005). Psychologia osobowości. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
• Rozmus, A. (2010). Wykładowca doskonały. Podręcznik nauczyciela akademickiego. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer.
• Sajdak, A. (2013). Paradygmaty kształcenia studentów i wspierania rozwoju nauczycieli akademickich. Cracow: Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls.
• Sajduk, B. (2015). Nowoczesna dydaktyka akademicka. Cracow: Wyższa Szkoła Europejska im. ks. Józefa Tischnera w Krakowie.
• Sheehy, K., Bucknall, S. (2008). How is technology seen in young people's visions of future education systems? Learning, Media and Technology, 33, 101-114. DOI: 10.1080/17439880802097642.
• Szpunar, M. (2017). Imperializm kulturowy internetu. Cracow: IDMiKS UJ.
• Szpunar, M. (2012). Nowe-stare medium. Internet między tworzeniem nowych modeli komunikacyjnych a reprodukowaniem schematów komunikowania masowego. Warsaw: IFiS PAN

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15219/em74.1346