The Knobe Effect From the Perspective of Normative Orders

• Autorzy: Andrzej Waleszczyński , Michał Obidziński , Julia Rejewska
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The characteristic asymmetry in the attribution of intentionality in causing side effects, known as the Knobe effect, is considered to be a stable model of human cognition. This article looks at whether the way of thinking and analysing one scenario may affect the other and whether the mutual relationship between the ways in which both scenarios are analysed may affect the stability of the Knobe effect. The theoretical analyses and empirical studies performed are based on a distinction between moral and non-moral normativity possibly affecting the judgments passed in both scenarios. Therefore, an essential role in judgments about the intentionality of causing a side effect could be played by normative competences responsible for distinguishing between normative orders. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Philosophy; Cognitive processes; Morality

PL

Filozofia; Procesy poznawcze; Moralność

• Czasopismo: Studia Humana
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: 7(4)
• Strony: 9--15

Twórcy

autor

Andrzej Waleszczyński

• Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University, Poland

autor

Michał Obidziński

• Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University, Poland

autor

Julia Rejewska

• Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University, Poland

Bibliografia

• Adams, F., and A. Steadman. Intentional Action and Moral Considerations: Still Pragmatic, Analysis 64 (3), 2004, pp. 268-76.
• Adams, F., and A. Steadman. Intentional Action in Ordinary Language: Core Concept or Pragmatic Understanding? Analysis 64 (2), 2004, pp. 173-81.
• Butler, R. J. Report on Analysis "Problem" no. 16. Analysis 38 (3), 1978, pp. 113-4.
• Guglielmo, S., and B. F. Malle. Can Unintended Side Effects Be Intentional? Resolving a Controversy Over Intentionality and Morality, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 36 (12), 2010, pp. 1635-47.
• Harman, G. Practical Reasoning, The Review of Metaphysics 29 (3), 1976, pp. 431-63.
• Hindriks, F. Control, Intentional Action, and Moral Responsibility, Philosophical Psychology 24 (6), 2011, pp. 787-801.
• Hindriks, F. Intentional Action and the Praise Blame Asymmetry, Philosophical Quarterly 58 (233), 2008, pp. 630-41.
• Holton, R. Norms and the Knobe Effect, Analysis 70 (3), 2010, pp. 417-24.
• Knobe, J. Intention, Intentional Action and Moral Considerations, Analysis 64 (2), 2004, pp. 181- 7.
• Knobe, J. Intentional Action and Side Effects in Ordinary Language, Analysis 63 (3), 2003, pp. 190-4.
• Knobe, J. The Concept of Intentional Action: A Case Study in the Uses of Folk Psychology, Philosophical Studies 130 (2), 2006, pp. 203-31.
• Leslie, A. M., J. Knobe, and A. Cohen. Acting Intentionally and the Side-Effect Effect, Psychological Science 17 (5), 2006, pp. 421-7.
• Malle, B. F., and S. E. Nelson. Judging Mens Rea: The Tension Between Folk Concepts and Legal Concepts of Intentionality, Behavioral Sciences and the Law 21, 2003, pp. 563-80.
• Mele, A., and S. Sverdlik. Intention, International Action, and Moral Responsibility, Philosophical Studies 82 (3), 1996, pp. 265-87.
• Nadelhoffer, T. Bad Acts, Blameworthy Agents, and Intentional Actions: Some Problems for Juror Impartiality, Philosophical Explorations 9 (2), 2006, pp. 203-19.
• Nadelhoffer, T. Desire, Foresight, Intentions, and Intentional Actions: Probing Folk Intuitions, Journal of Cognition and Culture 6 (1-2), 2006, pp. 133-57.
• Nadelhoffer, T. On Praise, Side Effects, and Folk Ascriptions of Intentionality, Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 24 (2), 2004, pp. 196-213.
• Nado, J. Effects of Moral Cognition on Judgments of Intentionality, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (4), 2008, pp. 709-31.
• Nichols, S., and J. Ulatowski. Intuitions and Individual Differences: The Knobe Effect Revisited, Mind and Language 22 (4), 2007, pp. 346-65.
• Paprzycka, K. Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities. In A. Kuźniar, and J. Odrowąż-Sypniewska (eds.), The Sciences, Leiden, Boston: Brill Rodopi, 2016, pp. 204-33.
• Paprzycka, K. The Omissions Account of the Knobe Effect and the Asymmetry Challenge, Mind and Language 30 (5), 2015, pp. 550-71.
• Piekarski, M. One or Many Normativities? Studia Philosophiae Christianae 54 (1), 2018, pp. 5- 24.
• Piekarski, M. Two Arguments Supporting the Thesis About the Predictive Nature of Reasons for Action, Studia Philosophiae Christianae 54 (1), 2018, pp. 93-119.
• Waleszczyński, A. Dwa porządki normatywne. Komentarz do dyskusji o intencjonalności działania, AVANT. The Journal of the Philosophical-Interdisciplinary Vanguard 8 (3), 2017, pp. 119-28.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/sh-2018-0019