Generation of regional input-output tables: a spatial econometric approach with illustrative simulations for France, Germany and Poland

• Autorzy: Andrzej Torój
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper investigates the construction of multisector-multiregion input-output tables by using spatial econometric methods. I demonstrate that, under reasonable assumptions, the problem of finding Leontief's technical coecients can be formulated as a modified multi-equation spatial Durbin model and the missing parameters can be estimated via maximum likelihood. The resulting coecients are computed as a function of country-wide coecients, as well as distance and regional-sectorial data on value added. The statistical performance of the model is scrutinized and the method is illustrated with simulations of regional (NUTS-3 level) economic impact assessment for generic companies located in Southern France, Germany and Poland. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Input-Output study; Regional analysis; Spatial distribution

PL

Badanie input-output (IO); Analiza regionalna; Rozkład przestrzenny

• Czasopismo: Collegium of Economic Analysis SGH - Working Papers
• Rocznik: 2018
• Numer: nr 37
• Strony: 36

Twórcy

autor

Andrzej Torój

• SGH Warsaw School of Economics, Poland

Bibliografia

• Akita T., Kataoka M., (2002): Interregional Interdependence and Regional Economic Growth: An Interregional Input-Output Analysis of the Kyushu Region, "Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies", 14, 18-40.
• Atkinson R.D., (1993): Defense Spending Cuts and Regional Economic Impact: An Overview, "Economic Geography", 69(2), 107-122.
• Baade R.A., Matheson V.A., (2004): The Quest for the Cup: Assessing the Economic Impact of the World Cup, "Regional Studies", 38(4), 343-354.
• Belisle C.J.P., (1992): Convergence theorems for a class of simulated annealing algorithms on Rd, "Journal of Applied Probability", 29, 885-895.
• Bonfiglio A., (2009): On the parametrization of techniques for representing regional economic structures, "Economic Systems Research", 21(2), 115-127.
• Buckland S.T., Burnham K.P., Augustin N.H., (1997): Model Selection: An Integral Part of Inference, "Biometrics", 53(2), 603-618.
• Cameron A.C., Trivedi P.K., (2005): Microeconometrics. Methods and Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Canning P., Wang Z., (2005): A Flexible Mathematical Programming Model to Estimate Interregional Input-Output Accounts, "Journal of Regional Science", 45, 539-563.
• Central Statistical Office in Poland (2014): Input-Output Table at Basic Prices in 2010, Statistical Information and Elaborations.
• Chenery H.B., (1953): Regional Analysis, pp.98-139, in: The Structure and Growth of the Italian Economy , edited by H.B. Chenery, P.G. Clark, V.C. Pinna, U.S. Mutual Security Agency, Rome.
• Chrzanowski M., (2013): Wykrycie lokalnych obszarów kooperacji w województwie lubelskim (analiza output-input), Kapitał Intelektualny Lubelszczyzny 2010-2013, URL http://www.kil.lubelskie.pl/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Wykrycie-lokalnych-obszar w-kooperacji-w-wojew dztwie-lubelskim-analiza-output-input-dr-Marek-Chrzanowski.pdf.
• Cicas G., Hendrickson C.T., Horvath A., Matthews H.S., (2007): A Regional Version of a US Economic Input-Output Life-Cycle Assessment Model, "International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment", 12(6), 365-372.
• Cristina de la Rúa, Lechón Y., (2016): An integrated Multi-Regional Input-Output (MRIO) Analysis of miscanthus biomass production in France: Socio-economic and climate change consequences, "Biomass and Bioenergy", 94, 21-30.
• Easterling W.E., (1997): Why regional studies are neneed in the development of full-scale integrated assessment modelling of global change processes, "Global Environmental Change", 7(4), 337-356.
• Flegg A., Tohmo T., (2013): Regional Input-Output Table and the FLQ Formula: A Case Study for Finland, "Regional Studies", 47(5), 703-721.
• Flegg A.T., Tohmo T., (2016): Estimating Regional Input Coefficients and Multipliers: The Use of FLQ is Not a Gamble, "Regional Studies", 50(2), 310-325.
• Flegg A.T., Webber C.D., Elliott M.V., (1995): On the Appropriate Use of Location Quotients in Generating Regional Input-Output Tables, "Regional Studies", 29, 547-561.
• Folmer H., Nijkamp P., (1985): Methodological aspects of impact analysis of regional economic policy, "Papers of the Regional Science Association", 57(1), 165-181.
• Fritz O., Kurzmann R., Pointner W., Streicher G., Zakarias G., (2003): Modeling the Regional Economy: A Regional Econometric Input-Output Approach, pp.297-302, in: Modeling and Control of Economic Systems, edited by R. Neck, A Proceedings volume from the 10th IFAC Symposium, Klagenfurt, Austria, 6-8 September 2001, Elsevier, Oxford.
• Funck R., Rembold G. (1975): A multiregion, multisector forecasting model for the Federal Republic of Germany, "Papers of the Regional Science Association", 34(1), 69-82.
• Giesecke J.A., Burns W.J., Berrett A., Bayrak E., Rose A., Slovic P., Suher M., (2012): Assessment of the Regional Economic Impact of Catastrrophic Events: CGE Analysis of Resource Loss and Behavioral Effects of an RDD Attack Scenario, "Risk Analysis", 32(4), 583-600.
• Gordon I.R., (1976): Gravity Demand Functions, Accessibility and Regional Trade, "Regional Studies", 10, 25-37.
• Hakfoort J., Poot T., Rietveld P., (2001): The Regional Economic Impact of an Airport: The Case of Amsterdam Schiphol Airport, "Regional Studies", 35(7), 595-604.
• Hallegatte S., (2008): An Adaptive Regional Input-Output Model and its Application to the Assessment of the Economic Cost of Katrina, "Risk Analysis", 28(3), 779-799.
• Harris R.I., Liu A., (1998): Input-Output Modelling of the Urban and Regional Economy: The Importance of External Trade, "Regional Studies", 32(9), 851-862.
• Horváth E., Frechtling D.C., (1999): Estimating the Multiplier Effects of Tourism Expenditures on a Local Economy through a Regional Input-Output Model, "Journal of Travel Research", 37(4), 324-332.
• Hulu E., Hewings G.J.D., (1993): The Development and Use of Interregional Input-Output Models for Indonesia Under Conditions of Limited Information, "Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies", 5, 135-153.
• Isard W., Kuenne R.E., (1953): The Impact of Steel upon the Greater New York-Philadelphia Industrial Region, "Review of Economics and Statistics", 35, 289-301.
• Jackson R.W., Schwarm W.R., Okuyama Y., Islam S., (2006): A Method for Constructing Commodity by Industry Flow Matrices, "Annals of Regional Science", 40, 909-920.
• Koutaniemi M., Louhela T., (2006): Construction of Regional Input-Output Tables in Finland 2002, 46th Congress of the European Regional SciRegional Studies: Enlargement, Southern Europe and the Mediterranean, August 30th - September 3rd, 2006, Volos, Greece.
• Kowalewski J., (2015): Regionalization of National Input-Output Tables: Empirical Evidence on the Use of the FLQ Formula, "Regional Studies", 49(2), 240-250.
• Kratena K., Zakarias G., (2004): Input Coefficient Change using Bi-proportional Econometric Adjustment Functions, "Economic Systems Research", 16, 191-203.
• Kuhn A. (2010): Input-Output Rechnung im Überblick, Statistisches Budnesamt, URL https://www.destatis.de/.
• Lamonica G.R., Chelli F.M., (2017): The performance of non-survey techniques for constructing sub-territorial input-output tables, "Papers in Regional Science", doi:10.1111/pirs.12297.
• Leontief W., (1936): Quantitative Input-Output Relations in the Economic System of the United States, "Review of Economics and Statistics", 18, 105-125.
• Leontief W., (1941): The Structure of American Economy 1919-1939, New York: Oxford University Press.
• Leontief W., Strout A., (1963): Multiregional Input-Output Analysis, pp. 119-149, edited by T. Barna, Structural Interdependence and Economic Development, London: Macmillan/St. Martin's Press.
• LeSage J.P., Pace R.K. (2009): Introduction to Spatial Econometrics, Chapman & Hall.
• Lindall S., Olson D., Alward G., (2006): Deriving Multi-Regional Models Using the IMPLAN National Trade Flows Model, "Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy", 36, 76-83.
• Liu L.N., Vilain P., (2004): Estimating Commodity Inflows to a Substate Region Using Input-Output Data: Commodity Flow Survey Accuracy Tests, "Journal of Transportation and Statistics", 7, 23-37.
• Loveridge S., (2004): A Typology and Assessment of Multi-sector Regional Economic Impact Models, "Regional Studies", 38(3), 305-317.
• McCann P., (2007): Urban and Regional Economics, Oxford University Press.
• Miller R.E., Blair P.D., (2009): Input-Output Analysis. Foundations and Extensions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Morrison W.I., Smith P., (1974): Nonsurvey input-output techniques at the small area level: an evaluation, "Journal of Regional Science", 14(1), 1-14.
• Moses L.N., (1955): The Stability of Interregional Trading Patterns and Input-Output Analysis, "American Economic Review", 45, 803-832.
• Nelder J.A., Mead R. (1965): A simplex algorithm for function minimization, "Computer Journal", 7, 308-313.
• Okamoto N., Ihara T. (eds.) (2005): Spatial Structure and Regional Development in China. An Interregional Input-Output Approach, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Pak M., Poissonnier A., (2017): Accounting for technology, trade and final consumption in employment: an Input-Output decomposition, INSEE Documents de Travail, G201611, URL https://www.insee.fr/en/statistiques/2563542.
• Polenske K.R., (1970): An Empirical Test of Interregional Input-Output Models: Estimation of 1963 Japanese Production, "American Economic Review", 60, 76-82.
• Polenske K.R., (2004): Leontief's 'Magnificent Machine' and Other Contributions to Applied Economics, pp.269-289, in: Wassily Leontief and Input-Output Economics, edited by Erik Dietzenbacher, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Rey S.J., (2000): Integrated regional econometric + input-output modeling: Issues and opportunities, "Papers in Regional Science", 79(3), 271-292.
• Rose A., Benavides J., Chang S.E., Szczesniak P., Lim D., (1997): The regional economic impact of an earthquake: direct and indirect effects of electricity lifeline disruptions, "Journal of Regional Science", 37(3), 437-458.
• Rose A., Liao S.Y., (2005): Modeling regional economic resilience to disasters: a computable general equilibrium analysis of water service disruptions, "Journal of Regional Science", 45(1), 75-112.
• Round J.I., (1978): An interregional input-output approach to the evaluation of nonsurvey methods, "Journal of Regional Science", 18, 179-194.
• Santos J.R., May L., Haimar A.E., (2013): Risk-Based Input-Output Analysis of Inflenza Epidemic Consequences on Interdependent Workforce Sectors, "Risk Analysis", 33(9), 1620-1635.
• Sonis M., Hewings G.J., Okuyama Y., (2000): Feedback loops analysis of Japanese interregional trade, 1980-85-90, "Journal of Economic Geography", 1.
• Steinback S.R., (1999): Regional Economic Impact Assessments of Recreational Fisheries: An Application of the IMPLAN Modeling System to Marine Party and Charter Boat Fishing in Maine, "North American Journal of Fisheries Management", 19, 724-736.
• Theil H., (1967): Economics and Information Theory, New York: American Elsevier.
• Timmer M., (2012): The World Input-Output Database (WIOD): Contents, Sources and Methods, URL www.wiod.org/publications/source-docs/WIOD-sources.pdf.
• Tobler W., (1970): A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region, "Economic Geography", 46 (Supplement), 234-240.
• Tohmo T., (2004): New Developments in the Use of Location Quotients to Estimate Regional Input-Output Coefficients and Multipliers, "Regional Studies", 38(1), 43-54.
• Tomaszewicz Ł., Trębska J., (2005): Regional and interregional input-output tables for Poland, in: W. Welfe, P. Wdowiński, (red.), Modelling Economies in Transition 2004, Łódź: Uniwersytet Łódzki.
• Torój A., (2016): Regional Economic Impact Assessment with Missing Input-Output Data: A Spatial Econometrics Approach for Poland, "Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics", 8, 61-91.
• Turner K., Lenzen M., Wiedmann T., Barrett J., (2007): Examining the Global Environmental Impact of Regional Consumption Activities - Part 1: A Technical Note on Combining Input-Output and Ecological Footprint Analysis, "Ecological Economics", 62(1), 37-44.
• Uribe P., de Leeuw C., Theil H., (1966): The Information Approach to the Prediction of Interregional Trade Flows, "Review of Economic Studies", (33), 209-220.
• van der Linden J., Oosterhaven J., (1995): European Community Intercountry Input-Output Relations: Construction Method and Main Results for 1965-85, "Economic Systems Research", 7(3), 249-269.
• Wang Y., Geschke A., Lenzen M., (2017): Constructing a Time Series of Nested Multiregion Input-Output Tables, "International Regional Science Review", 40(5).
• Welfe W., Świeczewska I., Florczak W., Karp P., (2008): Rozwój regionalny - ujęcie ekonometryczne, Społeczna Wyższa Szkoła Przedsiębiorczości i Zarządzania w Łodzi, URL http://www.eedri.pl/pdf/116.pdf.
• West G.R., (1990): Regional Trade Estimation: A Hybrid Approach, "International Regional Science Review", 13, 103-118.
• Wiedmann T., Lenzen M., Turner K., Barrett J., (2006): Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities - Part 2: Review of input-output models for the assessment of environmental impact embodied in trade, "Ecological Economics", doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.12.003.
• Wiedmann T., Wilting H.C., Lenzen M., Lutter S., Palm V., (2011): Quo Vadis MRIO? Methodological, data and institutional requirements for multi-region input-output analysis, "Ecological Economics", 70, 1937-1945.
• Zawalińska K., Rok J., (2017): Wojewódzkie tablice przepływów międzygałęziowych dla Polski: konstrukcja i interpretacja, "Studia Regionalne i Lokalne", 3(69), 29-53.