Carbon Footprint of Beef Cattle in a Conventional Production System: a Case Study of a Large-Area Farming Enterprise in the Wielkopolska Region

• Autorzy: Jerzy Bieńkowski , Małgorzata Holka , Radosław Dąbrowicz , Janusz Jankowiak
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Animal production is a significant source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. One of the major challenges in sustainable management is to mitigate the effects of climate change by reducing GHG emissions. The diversity of animal production systems and accompanying diversification of technological processes, mean that specific production effects can be obtained at different levels of GHG emissions. The aim of the study was to determine the carbon footprint (CF) of beef cattle grown in a conventional system (i.e. indoor confinement). The research was carried out on the beef cattle farm belonging to a large-area enterprise, Długie Stare Ltd. The beef cattle production system consisted of the following subsystems: a basic breeding herd (consisting of suckler cows, replacement heifers and calves up to 6.5 months), breeding heifers, breeding bulls and fattening bulls. The method of life cycle analysis (LCA) in the stages from "cradle-to-farmgate" was used to assess the GHG emissions associated with the production of beef cattle. The average CF in the entire beef cattle production system was 25.43 kg of CO2 kg-1 of live weight of marketed cattle, while in the individual subsystems of basic breeding herd, breeding heifers, breeding bulls and fattening bulls, the CF (after GHG allocation) was: 11.0 kg CO2 eq., 34.30 kg CO2 eq., 27.32 and 25.40 kg CO2 eq., respectively. GHG emissions associated with young calves staying in the cow-calf pairs until weaning (in the period from 0-6.5 months), had a decisive influence on the final CF in each of the subsystems of beef cattle production. The second important factor directly affecting the CF was GHG emissions related to methane (CH4) enteric fermentation and manure management. Knowledge of factors affecting the CF structure allows better identification of critical areas in production processes with high GHG emission potential. Information on the CF of beef cattle and beef meat responds to a wider societal demand for the ecological characteristics of market products, which ultimately contributes to improving their market competitiveness. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Animal husbandry; Animal production; Beef meat; Gas emissions; Case study; Life Cycle Assessment (LCA); Agriculture

PL

Hodowla zwierząt; Produkcja zwierzęca; Mięso wołowe; Emisja gazów; Studium przypadku; Ocena cyklu życia; Rolnictwo

• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe SGGW w Warszawie. Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: 18(33)
• Numer: z. 3
• Strony: 23--35

Twórcy

autor

Jerzy Bieńkowski

• Institute for Agricultural and Forest Environment of Polish Academy of Sciences in Poznań

autor

Małgorzata Holka

• Institute for Agricultural and Forest Environment of Polish Academy of Sciences in Poznań

autor

Radosław Dąbrowicz

• Institute for Agricultural and Forest Environment of Polish Academy of Sciences in Poznań

autor

Janusz Jankowiak

• Institute for Agricultural and Forest Environment of Polish Academy of Sciences in Poznań

Bibliografia

• Bieńkowski, J., Holka, M., Jankowiak, J. (2017). Assessing the greenhouse gas emissions by carbon footprint in intensive agricultural production based on the examples of winter oilseed rape. Problems of World Agriculture 17, 18-28 (In Polish with English abstract).
• Bragaglio, A., Napolitano, F., Pacelli, C., Pirlo, G., Sabia, E., Serrapica, F., Serrapica, F., Braghieri, A. (2018). Environmental impacts of Italian beef production: a comparison between different systems. Journal of Cleaner Production 172, 4033-4043.
• BSI (2011). PAS 2050:2011. SpeciÞcation for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. British Standards Institute, London, UK.
• Casey, J.W., Holden, N.M. (2006). Quantification of GHG emissions from sucker-beef production in Ireland. Agricultural Systems 90, 79-98.
• Desjardins, R.L., Worth, D.E., Vergé, X.P.C., Maxime, D., Dyer, J., Cerkowniak, D. (2012). Carbon footprint of beef cattle. Sustainability 4, 3279-3301.
• Ecoinvent database v. 3.5. 2018. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories. EEA (2013). EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2013. European Environment Agency, Luxembourg.
• EPD (2018). The International EPD System. EPD International AB. Available 20 February 2018 from: https://www.environdec.com.
• FAOSTAT (2018). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Crops and livestock products. Available 20 February 2018 from: http: www.fao.org/faostat/en/

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.22630/PRS.2018.18.3.63