Oval-sustainability in Entrepreneurship

• Autorzy: Maryna Pashkevych , Maryna Kharchenko , Nataliia Shishkova
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Although the sustainable development (SD) is associated with the triple balance of economic, social and environmental areas, we raised a question: whether it is an achievable goal for ordinary business units to develop sustainably. The heoretical research substantiates the contradictory essence of the SD in the context of entrepreneurship. Having employed the method of projection, we offered an advanced definition of the SD for an enterprise. Having applied the theory of the company life-cycle, we obtained stages of the enterprise's SD. The method of typology analysis allowed distinguishing new types of the SD. By means of the cost-benefit analysis, the research reveals OVAL-sustainability as a function of two variables (cost and value).(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Sustainable development; Entrepreneurship; Management

PL

Rozwój zrównoważony; Przedsiębiorczość; Zarządzanie

• Czasopismo: Open Economics
• Rocznik: 2018
• Numer: vol. 1, iss. 1
• Strony: 142--153

Twórcy

autor

Maryna Pashkevych

• Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine

autor

Maryna Kharchenko

• Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine

autor

Nataliia Shishkova

• Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine

Bibliografia

• Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic management journal, 26(3), 197-218.
• Campbell, H. F., & Brown, R. (2003). Valuing Traded and Non-Traded Commodities in Benefit-Cost Analysis. Benefit-Cost Analysis: Financial and Economic Appraisal using Spreadsheets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-52898-4.
• James, B. (1973). The theory of the corporate life cycle. Long Range Planning, 6(2), 68-74.
• Jensen, C. (2001). Interpreting Engineering Drawings.
• Ebner, D., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2006, September). The relationship between sustainable development and corporate social responsibility. In Corporate responsibility research conference (Vol. 4, No. 5.9, p. 2006).
• Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California management review, 36(2), 90-100.
• Frederick, W. C. (2008). Corporate social responsibility. In The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility.
• Gray, R., Owen, D., & Maunders, K. (1988). Corporate social reporting: emerging trends in accountability and the social contract. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 1(1), 6-20.
• Jankalov., M., & Jankal, R. (2017). The assessment of corporate social responsibility: approaches analysis, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues 4(4): 441-459.
• Hawken, P., Lovins, A. B., & Lovins, L. H. (2013). Natural capitalism: The next industrial revolution. Routledge.
• Keasey, K., & Wright, M. (1993). Issues in corporate accountability and governance: An editorial. Accounting and business research, 23(sup1), 291-303.
• Lindgreen, A., & Swaen, V. (2010). Corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 1-7.
• Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2004). Corporate social responsibility. Journal of business Ethics, 54(4), 323-337.
• McWilliams, A. (2000). Corporate social responsibility. Wiley Encyclopedia of Management.
• Moon, J. (2007). The contribution of corporate social responsibility to sustainable development. Sustainable development, 15(5), 296-306.
• Nino-Amezquita, J., Legotin, F., & Barbakov, O. (2017). Economic success and sustainability in pharmaceutical sector: a case of Indian SMEs, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues 5(1): 157-168.
• Oganisjana, K., Svirina, A., Surikova, S., Grīnberga-Zālīte, G., Kozlovskis, K. (2017). Engaging universities in social innovation research for understanding sustainability issues, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues 5(1): 9-22.
• Parkin, S., Sommer, F., & Uren, S. (2003, March). Sustainable development: understanding the concept and practical challenge. In Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering Sustainability (Vol. 156, No. 1, pp. 19-26). Thomas Telford Ltd.
• Pashkevych, M. S. (2011). Diversifіkacіja dіjal'nostі vugledobuvnih pіdpriєmstv v kontekstі rozvitku depresivnih regonv Ukrayiny [Diversification of activities of coal mining enterprises in the context of the development of depressed regions of Ukraine]. Ekonomchnij visnik Naconal'nogo girnichogo universitetu, (3), 11-17.
• Pashkevych, M. S. (2014). Ekologizacija virobnictva pidpriєmstv Ukrayiny [Ecologization of Ukrainian enterprises]. M. S.
• Pashkevych, T. O. Palamarchuk.-[Elektronnij resurs].- Rezhim dostupu: www.economy.nayka.com.ua/index.php.
• Pashkevych, M. S., & Shapoval, V. M. (2014). Predposylki formirovanija, sushhnost' i jevoljucija koncepcii ustojchivogo razvitija [Background formation, the essence and evolution of the concept of sustainable development]. Nauka i mir, 2(4), 40-45.
• Pivniak, H. H., Pilov, P. I., Pashkevych, M. S., & Shashenko, D. O. (2012). Synchro-mining: civilized solution of problems of mining regions' sustainable operation. Scientific Bulletin of National Mining University, (3).
• Pivniak, H. H., Shashenko, A. N., Pilov, P. I., & Pashkevych, M. S. (2012). Post mining: tehnologicheskij aspekt reshenija problemy [Post mining: the technological aspect of problem solving]. Gornyj informacionno-analiticheskij bjulleten' (nauchno-tehnicheskij zhurnal), (1).
• Prause, G., & Atari, S. (2017). On sustainable production networks for Industry 4.0, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues 4(4): 421-431.
• Smith, N. C. (2014). Morality and the Market (Routledge Revivals): Consumer Pressure for Corporate Accountability. Routledge.
• Stjepanović, S., Tomić, D., & Škare, M. (2017). A new approach to measuring green GDP: a cross-country analysis, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues 4(4): 574-590.
• Steurer, R., Langer, M. E., Konrad, A., & Martinuzzi, A. (2005). Corporations, stakeholders and sustainable development I: a theoretical exploration of business-society relations. Journal of business ethics, 61(3), 263-281.
• Swift, T. (2001). Trust, reputation and corporate accountability to stakeholders. Business Ethics: A European Review, 10(1), 16-26.
• Unerman, J., & Bennett, M. (2004). Increased stakeholder dialogue and the internet: towards greater corporate accountability or reinforcing capitalist hegemony?. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(7), 685-707.
• Valor, C. (2005). Corporate social responsibility and corporate citizenship: Towards corporate accountability. Business and society review, 110(2), 191-212.
• Voiculescu, A., McBarnet, D., & Campbell, T. (2007). The new corporate accountability: Corporate social responsibility and the law. Cambridge University Press.
• Welford, R. (2013). Hijacking environmentalism: Corporate responses to sustainable development. Routledge.
• Wilson, M. (2003). Corporate sustainability: What is it and where does it come from. Ivey business journal, 67(6), 1-5.
• Zadek, S. (2013). Building corporate accountability: Emerging practice in social and ethical accounting and auditing. Routledge.

Identyfikatory

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1515/openec-2018-0008