PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2019 | 7 | nr 3 | 54--65
Tytuł artykułu

A more efficient valuation of beaches using tourists' perspectives and Geographic Information System (GIS): The case of Patenga of Chittagong, Bangladesh

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The valuation of non-marketed goods and services of beaches in developing nations is rarely conducted; thus, lax management efforts at these resource-rich places often lead to degradation. In an attempt to resolve this issue the research used the travel cost valuation method and incorporated the use of geographic information system to estimate a never-before-done non-market valuation of the area visited by respondents at the beach of Patenga of Chittagong, Bangladesh. The uniqueness of the research stems from defining the area enjoyed by the survey respondents, via mapping, which helped assign the value generated to that particular part of Patenga and not the rest; this significantly decreased the underestimation problem of the travel cost methodology. The research used secondary sources and collected responses and geographical data from surveys conducted over a seven day period in March of 2018, from 277 respondents. A value of at least 14,331,044BDT/USD1.71million was estimated for 2018 for only 9% of Patenga. Furthermore, the Willingness to Pay approach was used to propose an entry fee of 15BDT/USD0.18 which would yield a revenue of more than 6,750,000BDT/USD79,882 around the year. The authors believe, these results will push the policy-makers and encourage stakeholder participation to better implement and monitor environmental management measures at Patenga. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Tom
7
Numer
Strony
54--65
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
autor
  • North South University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
autor
  • East Delta University, Bangladesh
Bibliografia
  • ADB Validation Report. 2008. Bangladesh: Sundarbans Biodiversity Conservation Project. Operations Evaluation Department, Asian Development Bank.
  • Alves B., Rigall-I-Torrent R., Ballester R., Benavente J., Ferraira O. 2015. Coastal erosion perception and willingness to pay for beach management (Cadiz, Spain). "Journal of Coastal Conservation", 19, 3: 269-280.
  • Amin M.A. 2019. Reckless plastic waste dumping greatly endangering Bay of Bengal. Dhaka Tribune. Retrieved in June 2019 from: https://www.dhakatribune.com/ bangladesh/environment/2018/12/17/reckless-plastic-waste-dumping-greatly-endangering-bay-of-bengal
  • Anning D. 2012. Estimation of the economic importance of beaches in Sydney, Australia, and implications for management (PhD Thesis). School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales.
  • Bal D.P., Mohanty S. 2014. Determination of Willingness to Pay for Entrance Fee to National Park: An Empirical Investigation. "International Journal of Ecological Economics & Statistic"s. CESER Publications. 35, 4: 65-73.
  • Bangladesh.com 2019. Relax on the Sands of Patenga Beach. Retrieved in June 2019 from: https://www.bangladesh. com/blog/relax-on-the-sands-of-patenga-beach/
  • Bashar R. 2018. Economic Valuation of Pablakhali's Select Water Resources. Proceedings of UIU's International Conference on Sustainable Development 2017, Scholars' Press, Germany.
  • Blakemore F., Williams A. 2008. British tourists' valuation of a Turkish beach using contingent valuation and travel cost methods." Journal of Coastal Research", 24, 6: 1469-1480.
  • Cavailhès J., Brossard T. Foltête J-C., Hilal M., Joly D., Tourneux F-P, Tritz C., Wavresky P. 2009. GIS-Based Hedonic Pricing of Landscape. "Environmental and Resource Economics", Springer-Science, 44, 4: 571-590.
  • Cripps K. 2018. Thailand bay made popular by 'The Beach' closes indefinitely. CNN Travel. Retrieved in June 2019 from: https://edition.cnn.com/travel/article/maya-bay-closure- thailand/index.html
  • Dharmaratne G.S., Brathwaite A.E. 1998. Economic valuation of the coastline for tourism in Barbados. "Journal of Travel Research", 37, 2: 138-144.
  • Dixon J.A., Scura L.F., Carpenter R.A., Sherman P.B. 1994. Economic Analysis of Environmental Impacts. Published in Association with the Asian Development Bank and the World Bank. Earthscan Publications Ltd., London. Retrieved in June 2019 from: http://documents.worldbank. org/curated/en/272091487845936282/pdf/110201-PUB-Box396328B-PUBLIC-Economic-Analysis-Of-Environmental-Impacts-1994.pdf
  • Fischer D.W. 1990. Public policy aspects of beach erosion control." American Journal of Economics and Sociology", 49, 2: 185-197.
  • Gopalakrishnan S., Martin D.S., Slott J.M., Murray A.B. 2009. The Value of Disappearing Beaches: A Hedonic Pricing Model with Endogenous Beach Width. Paper selected for the Agricultural & Applied Economics Association's 2009 AAEA & ACCI Joint Annual Meeting, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
  • Hanley N., Spash C.L. 1993. Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment. "The Economic Journal", 104, 427 (Nov., 1994): 1488-1490.
  • Hossain M.S., Islam A.K.M.N. 2016. Estimating Recreational Benefits of the Kuakata Sea Beach: A Travel Cost Analysis. "Daffodil International University Journal of Business and Economics":, 10, 2: 26-40.
  • Houston J.R. 2013. The economic value of beaches: a 2013 update, American Shore & Beach Preservation Association, Berkeley, California.
  • Islam K.M.N., Islam M.N. 2011. Economics of Extraction of Products from Sundarbans Reserve Forest. "Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Economics", 34, 1 & 2: 29-53.
  • Komahan S., Gunaratne L.H.P. 2017. :Scholars Journal of Economics, Business and Management:, 4, 10: 689-695.
  • Lovett A.A., Brainard J.S., Bateman I.J. 1997. Improving Benefit Transfer Demand Functions: A GIS Approach. "Journal of Environmental Management", Elsevier, 51, 4: 373-389.
  • Matthew K.N., Shuib A., Ramachandran S., Afandi S.H.M. 2018. Economic Valuation using travel cost method (TCM) in Kilim Karst Geoforest Park, Langkawi, Malaysia. "Journal of Tropical Forest Science", Forest Research Institute Malaysia. 31, 1: 78-89.
  • Nde P.T. 2011. Non-market valuation of beach recreation using the travel cost method (TCM) in the context of the developing world: an application to visitors of the Ngoe beach Kribi, Cameroon. Second cycle, A2E. Uppsala: SLU, Dept. of Economics.
  • Offroad Bangladesh. Patenga Beach. Retrieved in December 2017 from: www.offroadbangladesh.com/places/patenga-beach/
  • Raybould M., Lazarow N., Anning D., Ware D., Blackwell B.D. 2011. A Travel Cost Model of Local Residents' Beach Recreation Values on the Gold Coast. Bond University and Australian National University Press. Australia.
  • Reynisdottir M., Song H., Agrusa J. 2008. Willingness to pay entrance fees to natural attractions: An Icelandic case study. "Tourism Management" 29, 6: 1076-1083.
  • Schuhmann P.W., Skeete R., Waite R., Lorde T., Bangwayo-Skeete P., Oxenford H.A., Gill D., Moore W., Spencer F. 2019. Visitors' willingness to pay marine conservation fees in Barbados. Tourism Management, 71: 315-326.
  • Shammin M.R. 1999. Application of the Travel Cost Method (TCM): A Case Study of Environmental Valuation of Dhaka Zoological Garden. [in:] J.E. Hecht (ed.), The Economic Value of the Environment: Cases from South Asia. Dhaka. Bangladesh: 39-56.
  • Stronge W.B. 2005. Economic Value of Beaches. [in:] Schwartz M.L. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Coastal Science. Springer.
  • Tahzeeda J., Khan M.R., Bashar R. 2018. Valuation approaches to ecosystem goods and services for the National Botanical Garden, Bangladesh. "Environmental & Socio-economic Studies", 1: 1-9.
  • The World Bank. 2016. Helping Bangladesh Reach Middle Income Country Status.
  • Travel and Tourism Economic Impact. 2017. World Travel and Tourism Council. Bangladesh
  • Turner R.K. (ed.) 1993. Sustainable Environmental Economics and Management, Belhaven Press, London.
  • University of Hawaii Economic Research Organization (UHERO). 2013. Methodologies to assess the Value of the Coastal Zone Management (CZM) Special Management area (SMa) Permit Program. Honolulu. Hawaii.
  • Wieland R.C., Horowitz J. 2007. Estimating the recreational consumer surplus at Maryland's state-owned forests. Report for Harry R. Hughes Center for Agro-Ecology, University of Maryland.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171565220

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.