Trust in Symbolic Interactionist Research and in Phenomenological Investigation

• Autorzy: Krzysztof Konecki
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

We will show some interpretations of trust from two perspectives: symbolic interactionist research and phenomenological qualitative research. Trust could be interpreted in many ways. Generally, the cognitive and "rational" approach prevails in researching trust in social sciences. The everyday life connotation of trust that is created by chance or in unpredictable situations because of unknown and unpredictable conditions could be treated by such research as "irrational"; however, we are interested in those meanings of trust and their research in this paper. The symbolic interactionist perspective will help us to see how the subjective interpretation and situational features influence the creation of trust or distrust. We will analyze trust as an interactive phenomenon. The phenomenological approach could show us the essential features of trust and also its embeddedness in the lifeworld of participants. We will see how the lifeworld is maintained or refused, how routine activities are the basis of trust, and how existential security is created. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Trust; Existentialism

PL

Zaufanie; Egzystencjalizm

• Czasopismo: Polish Sociological Review
• Rocznik: 2019
• Numer: nr 3 (207)
• Strony: 271--287

Twórcy

autor

Krzysztof Konecki

• University of Lodz, Poland

Bibliografia

• Algan, Y. & Cahuc, P. 2010. Inherited trust and growth, The American Economic Review 100(5): 2060-2092.
• Bachmann, R. & Zaheer, A. (eds.). 2006. Handbook of Trust Research. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
• Bentz, V. M., Rehorick, D., Marlatt, J., Nishii, A. & Estrada, C. 2018. Transformative Phenomenology as an Antidote to Technological Deathworlds, Schutzian Research 10: 189-220.
• Blumer, H. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
• Blumer, H. 2004. George Herbert Mead and Human Conduct. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.
• Brown, P. R. 2009. The phenomenology of trust: A Schutzian analysis of the social construction of knowledge by gynaeoncology patients, Health, Risk & Society 11(5): 391-407. doi:10.1080/13698570903180455.
• Camus, A. 1988. The Stranger. NewYork: Vintage International.
• Carolan, M. S. & Bell, M. 2003. In Truth We Trust: Discourse, Phenomenology, and the Social Relations of Knowledge in an Environmental Dispute, Environmental Values 12: 225-45.
• Charon, J. M. 1998. Symbolic Interactionism. An Introduction, An Interpretation, An Integration. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Coleman, J. 1983. Recontracting, trustworthiness and the stability of vote exchanges, Public Choice 40: 89-94.
• Collins, R. 2004. Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Crowther, S., & Smythe, E. 2016. Open, trusting relationships underpin safety in rural maternity a hermeneutic phenomenology study, BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth, 161-11. doi:10.1186/s12884-016-1164-9.
• Dasgupta, P. 1988. Trust as a commodity, in: D. Gambetta (ed.), Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
• Diehl J., & Witt D. 2017. Work Team Training and Performance Gaps, Training, July/August, 2017.
• Frederiksen, M. 2014. Calculativeness and trust: A view from phenomenology, Journal of Trust Research 4(1): 34-43.
• Fukuyama, F. 1995. Trust: Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press.
• Garfinkel, H. 1963. A conception of experiments with "Trust" as a condition of stable concerted actions, in: J. O'Brien (ed.), The Production of Reality: Essays and Readings on Social Interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press, pp. 379-390.
• Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Gawley, T. 2007. Revisiting trust in symbolic interaction: presentations of trust development in University Administration, Qualitative Sociology Review III(2). Retrieved August, Year 2018 (http://www.qualitativesociologyreview.org/ENG/archive eng.php).
• Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
• Giddens, A. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Glaeser, E. L., Laibson, D. I., Scheinkman, J. A., & Soutter, C. L. 2000. Measuring trust, Quarterly Journal of Economics 115(3): 811-846.
• Goffman, E. 1956. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Social Sciences Research Centre.
• Goffman, E. 1971. Strategic Interaction. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
• Goffman, E. 1974. Frame Analysis: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Anchor.
• Guzik, P. 2018. Church in Poland begins publishing sex abuse data, Sep 28, 2018. Retrieved on 5.12.2018 from: https://cruxnow.com/church-in-europe/2018/09/28/church-in-poland-begins-publishing-sex-abuse-data/.
• Hawthorn, G. 2000. Three Ironies in Trust, in: D. Gambetta (ed.), Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, electronic edition, Department of Sociology, University of Oxford, chapter 7, pp. 111-126.
• Harvey, P. 2013. An Introduction to Buddhism: Teachings, History and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Henslin, J. M. 1968. Trust and the Cab Driver, in: M. Truzzi (ed.), Sociology and Everyday Life. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, pp. 138-157.
• Hochschild, A. 2016. Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right. New York: New Press.
• Johnson, J., & Melnikov, A. 2009. The Wisdom of Distrust: Reflections on Ukrainian Society And Sociology, Studies in Symbolic Interaction 33: 9-18.
• Konecki, K. T. 2018. The Problem of Ontological Insecurity. What Can We Learn from Sociology Today? Some Zen Buddhist Inspirations, Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej 14(2): 50-83 [12th December, 2018]. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.14.2.03.
• Kramer, R. M. (ed.). 2006. Organizational trust: A Reader. Oxford Management Readers. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
• Fergus, L., Möllering, G., & Saunders, M. N. K., (eds.). 2015. Handbook of Research Methods on Trust. 2nd ed. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
• Mead, G. H. 1934. Mind Self and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist (Edited by Charles W. Morris). Chicago: University of Chicago.
• Misztal, B. 1996. Trust in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Misztal, B. 2001. Normality and trust in Goffman's theory of interaction order, Sociological Theory 19(3): 312-324.
• Omyła-Rudzka, M. 2016. Zaufanie społeczne, CBOS. Retrieved on 5.12.2018 from: https://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2016/K 018 16.PDF.
• Ortiz-Ospina, E., & Roser, M. 2018. Trust. Published online at OurWorldInData.org. Retrieved on 5.12.2018 from: https://ourworldindata.org/trust.
• Rehorick, D. A., & Bentz, V. M. (Eds.). 2008. Transformative phenomenology: Changing ourselves, lifeworlds, and professional practice. New York, NY: Lexington Books.
• Sahn, S. 1976. Dropping Ashes on the Buddha. S. Mitchel (Ed.). New York, NY: Grove Press.
• Sartre, J. P. 1984. Being and Nothingness. Trans. Hazel E. Barnes. New York: Washington Square Press.
• Scheff, T. J. 1990. Microsociology. Discourse, Emotion, and Social Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Schulz, L. L., & Rubel, D. J. 2011. A Phenomenology of Alienation in High School: The Experiences of Five Male Non-completers, Professional School Counseling 14(5): 286-298.
• Schutz, A. 1972 [1932]. The Phenomenology of the Social World. London: Heinemann.
• Simpson, M. 2018. Pope's Ireland visit: Church 'no longer has trust,' 22 August 2018. Retrieved on 5.12.2018 from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-45275721.
• Sukach, T., Gonzalez, N., & Cravens Pickens, J. 2018. Experiences of female sex trafficking survivors: A Phenomenological analysis, The Qualitative Report 23(6): 1422-1440. Retrieved on 01.10.2018 from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol23/iss6/10.
• Sztompka, P. 1999. Trust: A Sociological Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Thomas, W. I., & Thomas, D. S. 1928. The Child in America: Behavior Problems and Programs. New York: Knopf.
• Wessberg, A., Lundgren, I., & Elden, H. 2017. Being in limbo: Women's lived experiences of pregnancy at 41 weeks of gestation and beyond-A phenomenological study. BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth 171-12. doi:10.1186/s12884-017-1342-4.
• Wiley, N. 2003. The self as self-fulfilling prophecy, Symbolic Interaction 26(4): 501-513.
• Williams, P. & Tribe, A. 2000. Buddhist Thought. A Complete Introduction to the Indian Tradition. New York: Routledge.
• Yamagishi, T. 1998. Trust. The Evolutionary Game of Mind and Society. Tokyo: Tokyo University Press.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.26412/psr207.02