General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and Its Implications for Software Supporting Automation of Production

• Autorzy: Elżbieta Milewska
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The purpose of this article is to illustrate how the General Data Protection Regulation GDPR), which came into force in 2018 in Polish legal system, affects protection in the scope of collection, processing, storage and transfer of personal data in IT systems supporting production. Design/methodology/ approach: Because production control systems are based on the identification and analysis of human and machine resources behaviour, a significant impact of recent legal regulations on automation of manufacturing processes is perceived. However, according to GDPR, the data enabling unambiguous identification are protected. Findings: Resource recognition is not only important for the scheduling of production activities, but also for event logging. Research limitations/implications: It should be noted that both the allocation of human resources, taking into account the boundary conditions for the execution of tasks and the substitutability of individual employees, as well as reporting the efficiency and effectiveness of production, requires the unambiguous identification of people. It is carried out by means of one or several factors that physically, mentally, economically or socially describe the resource. Practical implications: Since the coordination of the company's production activities requires the processing of data describing human resources, taking into account the aspect of their security, it is necessary to create a new business model, which is the subject of research presen- ted in this document. Originality/value: Ensuring the security of data in the IT system, in addition to user authentication to resources, means also protection against accidental or unlawful destruction, loss, modification, unauthorized disclosure or unauthorized access to personal data sent, stored or otherwise processed. When making decisions about the application of certain security measures, it is necessary to take into account the value of the data and the effects that the infringement may cause. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Industry 4.0; Smart factories; Data security; Information security

PL

Przemysł 4.0; Inteligentne fabryki; Bezpieczeństwo danych; Bezpieczeństwo informacji

• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2020
• Numer: z. 144
• Strony: 349--361

Twórcy

autor

Elżbieta Milewska

• Silesian University of Technology

Bibliografia

• 1. Cornock, M. 2018). General Data Protection Regulation GDPR) and implications for research. Maturitas, 111, pp. A1-A2. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.01.017.
• 2. European Parliament and Council, General Data Protection Regulation, EU) 2016/679 2016). Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32- 016R0679, November 21, 2018.
• 3. European Parliament and of the Council 2017). Data Protection Directive Directive 95/46/EC). Retrieved from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX%- 3A31995L0046, December 21, 2018.
• 4. Gilchrist, A. 2016). Industry 4.0: The Industrial Internet of Things. Berkely, CA: Apress.
• 5. Kościuk, D. 2018). General Data Protection Regulation GDPR) - The EU Law Strengthening the Information Society in Poland. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 2 23), pp. 139-148. doi: 10.15290/bsp.2018.23.02.10.
• 6. Lindgren, P. 2016). GDPR Regulation Impact on Different Business Models and Busines- ses. Journal of Multi Business Model Innovation and Technology, 4 3), pp. 241-254, doi: 10.13052/jmbmit2245-456X.434.
• 7. Milewska, E. 2011a). Wykorzystanie narzędzi informatycznych w procesie sterowania strumieniem przepływu materiałowego. Mechanik, 7 84), CD. pp. 575-582.
• 8. Milewska, E. 2011b). Zintegrowane systemy informatyczne wspomagające zarządzanie zdolnościami produkcyjnymi. Studia i Materiały Polskiego Stowarzyszenia Zarządzania Wiedzą, 40, pp. 263-271.
• 9. Milewska, E. 2014a). Aspekty techniczne i organizacyjne wdrożenia systemu informatycznego wspomagającego planowanie produkcji. Systemy Wspomagania w Inżynierii Produkcji, 2 8)/2014/13, pp. 142-152.
• 10. Milewska, E. 2014b). Wykorzystanie wiedzy technologicznej w procesie sterowania przepływem produkcji. In: R. Knosala ed.), Innowacje w zarządzaniu i inżynierii produkcji. T. 1 (pp. 604-613). Opole: Oficyna Wydaw. Polskiego Towarzystwa Zarządzania Produkcją.
• 11. Milewska, E. (2016). Wdrożenie hybrydowej metody sterowania produkcją dyskretną. In: R. Knosala (ed.), Innowacje w zarządzaniu i inżynierii produkcji. T. 1 (pp. 759-767). Opole: Oficyna Wydaw. Polskiego Towarzystwa Zarządzania Produkcją.
• 12. Milewska, E. (2017a). IT systems supporting the management of production capacity introduction. Management Systems in Production Engineering, 1(25), pp 60-67, doi: 10.1515/mspe-2017-0009.
• 13. Milewska, E. (2017b). Zdolność adaptacyjna przedsiębiorstw produkcyjnych. Systemy Wspomagania w Inżynierii Produkcji, 6(6), pp. 159-166.
• 14. Milewska, E., and Gembalska-Kwiecień, A. (2018). Selected aspects of human resources management based on competence matrix. 5th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts. SGEM 2018 Conference proceedings. Book 1, Vol. 5, pp. 861-866, doi: 10.5593/sgemsocial2018/1.5/S05.107.
• 15. Milewska, E., and Skowron, B. (2018a). Use of IT technologies in the calculation of the technological production cost conducted - a case study. In: A. Albrychiewicz-Słocińska, A. Czarnecka, A. Dunay (Eds.), Challenges of management in modern organizations (pp. 188-196). Gödöllő.
• 16. Milewska, E., and Skowron, B. (2018b). Use of IT technologies in the management of production process quality. MATEC Web of Conferences, 183, 03012 2018, doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201818303012.
• 17. Olkiewicz, M. (2016). System zarządzania determinantą bezpieczeństwa informacji w działalności gospodarczej. Studia nad Bezpieczeństwem, 1, pp. 85-112.
• 18. Pandit, H.J., O'Sullivan, D., and Lewis, D. (2018). GDPR Data Interoperability Model, 23rd EURAS Annual Standardisation Conference, Dublin, Ireland. http://purl.org/ADAPT/ pub/E18EURAS.
• 19. Preuveneers, D., Joosen, W., and Ilie-Zudor, E. (2016). Data Protection Compliance Regulations and Implications for Smart Factories of the Future. 12th International Conference on Intelligent Environments IE, London, pp. 40-47. doi: 10.1109/IE.2016.15.
• 20. Skowron, B., and Milewska, E. (2018). Use of IT technologies in the management of production process quality - a case study. Book of proceedings - ICoM 2018. F. Bylok, A. Albrychiewicz-Słocińska, L. Cichobłaziński, p. 575-579.
• 21. Tikkinen-Piri, C., Rohunen, A., and Markkula, J. (2018). EU General Data Protection Regulation: Changes and implications for personal data collecting companies. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(1), pp. 134-153, doi: 10.1016/j.clsr.2017.05.015.
• 22. Ustawa z dnia 26 czerwca 1974 r. Kodeks pracy. Dz.U. 1974, Nr 24, poz. 141 z póz. zm.).
• 23. Ustawa z dnia 29 sierpnia 1997 r. o ochronie danych osobowych. Dz.U. z 2016 r., poz. 922).
• 24. Vojkovic, G. (2018). Will the GDPR slow down development of smart cities? 41st International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics MIPRO, Opatija, pp. 1295-1297. doi: 10.23919/MIPRO.2018. 8400234.
• 25. Wirth, C., Kolain, M. (2018). Privacy by blockchain design: a blockchainenabled GDPR- compliant approach for handling personal data. Reports of the European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies, 2(6), doi: 10.18420/blockchain2018_03.
• 26. Wurm, J., Hoang, K., Arias, O., Sadeghi, A.R., and Jin, Y. (2016). Security analysis on consumer and industrial IoT devices. 21st Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference ASP-DAC, Macau, pp. 519-524. doi: 10.1109/ASPDAC.2016.7428064.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2020.144.28