PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2020 | vol. 20, iss. 1 | 437--455
Tytuł artykułu

Housing Poverty in Polish Households and its Diversity

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Research background: The European Housing Charter defines housing as a basic necessity, but also a fundamental social right underpinning the European social model as well as an element of human dignity. Housing conditions constitute a major element of the broader quality of life for individuals and society. Purpose: The aim of this paper is to assess the level of housing poverty in general and in selected areas of an assessment of Polish households due to the selected socio-demographic characteristics of the respondent or household. Research methodology: The study was conducted on the basis of micro-data from the Household Budget Survey of 2017. To determine the housing poverty risk for each household the Integrated Fuzzy and Relative approach was used, which allows for the aggregation of symptoms measured on different measuring scales into the one risk assessment of poor housing conditions. This assessment, overall and in specific areas of housing poverty, became the basis for the study of the factors differentiating this kind of poverty. For this purpose, regression trees were used. Results: The greatest risk of housing poverty was observed in households living in rural areas, in families with many children, in the households of single mothers or fathers, as well as in households living on unearned sources of income. Novelty: The use of the Integrated Fuzzy and Relative approach for housing poverty research is an innovative approach and is applied in the paper. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Strony
437--455
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
autor
  • Cracow University of Economics, Poland
  • Cracow University of Economics, Poland
Bibliografia
  • Alkire, S., Foster, J.E., Seth, S., Santos, M.E., Roche, J.M., Ballon, P. (2015). Multidimensional Poverty Measurement and Analysis: Chapter 3 - Overview of Methods for Multidimensional Poverty Assessment, OPHI Working Paper No. 84.
  • Aristei, D., Bracalente, B. (2011). Measuring Multidimensional Inequality and Well-being: Methods and Empirical Applications to Italian Regions. Statistica, LXXI (2), 239-266.
  • Atkinson, A.B., Bourguignon, F. (1982). The Comparison of Multi-Dimensional Distributions of Economic Status. Review of Economic Studies, XLIX, 183-201.
  • Belhadj, B. (2014). Employment Measure in Development Countries via Minimum Wage and Poverty: New fuzzy approach. Opsearch, 52 (2), 329-339, DOI: 10.1007/s12597-0140176-3.
  • Betti, G. (2016). What Impact Has the Economic Crisis Had on Quality of Life in Europe? A Multidimensional and Fuzzy Approach. Quality and Quantity, 51 (1), 1-14. DOI: 10.1007/s11135-015-0308-8.
  • Betti, G., Cheli, B., Lemmi, A., Verma, V. (2006). On the Construction of Fuzzy Measures for the Analysis of Poverty and Social Exclusion. Statistica & Applicazioni, 4 (1), 77-97.
  • Betti, G., Soldi, R., Talev, I. (2016). Fuzzy Multidimensional Indicators of Quality of Life: The Empirical Case of Macedonia. Social Indicators Research, 127 (1), 39-53. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-015-0965-y
  • Betti, G., Vetrma, V. (1999). Measuring the Degree of Poverty in a Dynamic and Comparative Context: A Multi-dimensional Approach Using Fuzzy Set Theory, Proceedings. ICCS-VI, 11, 289-301.
  • Betti, G., Verma, V. (2008). Fuzzy Measures of the Incidence of Relative Poverty and Deprivation: A Multi-dimensional Perspective. Statistical Methods & Applications, 17 (2), 225-250. DOI 10.1007/s10260-007-0062-8.
  • Borg, I. (2015). Housing deprivation in Europe: On the role of rental tenure types. Housing, Theory and Society, 32 (1). 73-93. DOI: 10.1080/14036096.2014.969443.
  • Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Stone, J.C., Olshen, R.A. (1998). Classifications and Regression Trees. Chapman &Hall.
  • Cerioli, A., Zani, S. (1990). A Fuzzy Approach to the Measurement of Poverty. In: C. Dagum (ed.), Income and Wealth Distribution, Inequality and Poverty. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
  • Cheli, B., Lemmi, A. (1995). Totally Fuzzy and Relative Approach to the Multidimensional Analysis of Poverty. Economics Notes, 24, 115-134.
  • Cheli, B. (1995). Totally Fuzzy and Relative Measures of Poverty in Dynamic Context. Metron, LIII (3-4), 183-205.
  • Chiappero Martinetti, E. (1994). A New Approach to Evaluation of Well-being and Poverty by Fuzzy Set Theory. Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia, 53, 367-388.
  • De Battisti, F., Marasini, D., Nicolini, G. (2015). A Measure of Job Satisfaction by Means of Fuzzy Set Theory. Statistica Applicata - Italian Journal of Applied Statistics, 23 (3), 361-374.
  • Dudek, H., Szczęsny, W. (2017). Correlates of Multidimensional Indicator of Quality of Life - Fractional Outcome Model Approach. Statistika, 97 (4), 46-61.
  • Eurostat (2018). Living conditions in Europe. Statistical book.
  • Fahey, T., Norris, M. (2010). Housing. In: F.G. Castles, S. Leibfried, J. Lewis, H. Obinger, C. Pierson (eds.), The oxford handbook of welfare state. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press.
  • GUS (2018). Gospodarka mieszkaniowa w latach 2013-2017. Warszawa-Lublin. Retrieved from: http://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/infrastruktura-komunalna-nieruchomosci (19.09.2019).
  • GUS (2019). Gospodarka mieszkaniowa w 2018 roku. Informacja sygnalna. Retrieved from: https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/infrastruktura-komunalna-nieruchomosci/nieruchomosci-budynki-infrastruktura-komunalna/gospodarka-mieszkaniowa-w-2018-roku,14,2.html (19.09.2019).
  • Hanratty, M. (2017). Do Local Economic Conditions Affect Homelessness? Impact of Area Housing Market Factors, Unemployment, and Poverty on Community Homeless Rates. Housing Policy Debate, 27 (4), 640-655. DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2017.1282885.
  • Hansson, A.G., Lundgren, B. (2019). Defining Social Housing: ADiscussion on the Suitable Criteria. Housing, Theory and Society, 36 (2), 149-166, DOI: 10.1080/14036096.2018.1459826.
  • https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/income-and-living-conditions/data/main-tables (19.09.2019).
  • Kolm, S.C. (1977). Multidimensional egalitarianism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91, 1-13.
  • Kozera, A., Stanisławska, J., Głowicka-Wołoszyn, R. (2017). Zjawisko ubóstwa mieszkaniowego w krajach Unii Europejskiej. Wiadomości Statystyczne, 1 (668), 77-89.
  • Kurowski, P., Broda-Wysocki, P. (2017). Ubóstwo mieszkaniowe: oblicza, trendy, wyzwania. Polityka Społeczna, 515 (2), 1-8.
  • Łapczyński, M. (2010). Drzewa klasyfikacyjne i regresyjne w badaniach marketingowych. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie.
  • Maasoumi, E. (1986). The measurement and decomposition of Multidimensional Inequality. Econometrica, 54, 771-779.
  • Panek, T. (2010). Multidimensional Approach to Poverty Measurement: Fuzzy Measures of the Incidence and Depth of Poverty. Statistics in Transition 11 (2), 361-379.
  • Rakauskienė, O.G., Volodzkienė, L. (2017). The Inequality of Material Living Conditions in EU Countries. Economics and Sociology, 10 (1), 265-278. DOI: 10.14254/2071789X.2017/10-1/19.
  • Ripley, B.D. (1996). Pattern recognition and neural networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Silber, J. (2011). Multidimensional Approach to Poverty Measurement: An Empirical Analysis of Poverty in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy and Spain, Based on the European Panel. Applied Economics, 43 (8), 951-961. DOI: 10.1080/00036840802600129.
  • Stephens, M., van Steen, G. (2011). 'Housing poverty' and income poverty in England and The Netherlands. Housing Studies, 26, 7-8, 1035-1057. DOI:10.1080/02673037.2011.615146.
  • Sunega, P., Lux, M. (2016). Subjective perception versus objective indicators of overcrowding and housing affordability. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 31, 695-717. DOI: 10.1007/s10901-016-9496-3.
  • The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948), the United Nations. Retrieved from: https://www.jus.uio.no/lm/en/pdf/un.universal.declaration.of.human.rights.1948.portrait.letter.pdf (19.09.2019).
  • Tsui, K.Y. (1995). Multidimensional Generalizations of the Relative and Absolute Inequality Indices: The Atkinson-Kolm-Sen Approach. Journal of Economic Theory, 67, 251-265.
  • Tsui, K.Y. (1999). Multidimensional Inequality and Multidimensional Generalized Entropy Measure: an axiomatic derivation. Social Choice and Welfare, 16, 145-157.
  • Tyrell, F.A., Tuppett, M.Y. (2017). A Growth Curve Analysis of Housing Quality among Transition-Aged Foster Youth. Child Youth Care Forum, 56, 91-117, DOI. 10.1007/s10566016-9370-1.
  • Ulman, P., Ćwiek, M. (2020). Measuring housing poverty in Poland: a multidimensional analysis. Housing Studies. DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2020.1759515.
  • Walesiak, M., Gatnar, E. (2012). Statystyczna analiza danych z wykorzystaniem programu R. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  • Weymark, J.A. (2006). The Normative Approach to the Measurement pf Multidimensional Inequality. In: F. Farina, E. Savaglio, (eds.), Inequality and economic integration (pp. 303-328). London: Routledge.
  • World Health Organization Technical Report Series (1961), No. 225.
  • Zadeh, L.A. (1965). Fuzzy set. Information and Control, 8 (3), 338-353.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171600157

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.