Are the European Commission's Forecasts of Public Finances Better than Those of National Governments?

Czasopismo

---

• Autorzy: Jakub Rybacki
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The academic literature in the past has frequently highlighted that the European Commission (EC) tends to provide more accurate public finance forecasts compared with national governments, thanks to its neutrality. The recent conflicts regarding the excessive deficit procedure with Romania and Italy and rule of law with Hungary and Poland raises the question of whether such conclusions are still binding. Therefore, we analysed a panel of forecasts submitted by the national governments with an annual update of Convergence programmes and corresponding EC predictions. Our dataset contains predictions of the general government deficit, revenues and expenditures for EU27 economies and the United Kingdom in the years 2014-2019. First, the analysis shows no meaningful discrepancies between both estimates when the horizon is set at the current year. Forecasts for the next year have equal accuracy in the case of government revenues and expenditures. However, the EC performs worse in the case of the final deficit. Second, cross-country effects are present, but the accuracy is different mainly in the very small economies, that is, the Baltic countries, Cyprus, Malta and Luxembourg. Amongst the more populated states, the EC outperforms the Slovakian and Denmark governments but has worse performance than the Irish, Portuguese and Spanish governments. We also do not see evidence of any political bias in the forecasts. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Public finance; Economic forecast

PL

Finanse publiczne; Prognozy gospodarcze

• Czasopismo: ---
• Strony: 101--109

Twórcy

autor

Jakub Rybacki

• SGH Warsaw School of Economics, Poland

Bibliografia

• Baldi, G. (2016). Fiscal policy rules, budget deficits, and forecasting biases. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 19(2), 185-194.
• Brück, T., & Stephan, A. (2006). Do Eurozone countries cheat with their budget deficit forecasts? Kyklos, 59(1), 3-15.
• Diebold, F. X., & Mariano, R. S. (1995). Comparing predictive accuracy. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 13, 253-263.
• Gilbert, N. D., & de Jong, J. F. (2017). Do European fiscal rules induce a bias in fiscal forecasts? Evidence from the Stability and Growth Pact. Public Choice, 170(1-2), 1-32.
• Frankel, J., & Schreger, J. (2013). Over-optimistic official forecasts and fiscal rules in the Eurozone. Review of World Economics, 149(2), 247-272.
• Harvey, D., Leybourne, S., & Newbold, P. (1997). Testing the equality of prediction mean squared errors. International Journal of Forecasting, 13(2), 281-291.
• Jonung, L., & Larch, M. (2006). Improving fiscal policy in the EU: the case for independent forecasts. Economic Policy, 21(47), 492-534.
• Merola, R., & Pérez, J. (2012), Fiscal forecast errors: Governments vs independent agencies? Banco de Espana Working Paper No. 1233.
• Pina, Á. M., & Venes, N. M. (2011). The political economy of EDP fiscal forecasts: an empirical assessment. European Journal of Political Economy, 27(3), 534-546.
• Rybacki, J. (2019). Fiscal deficit forecasts by international institutions: Evidence for a double standard? Collegium of Economic Analysis SGH Working Papers, 44.
• Schaechter, A., Kinda, T., Budina, N. T., & Weber, A. (2012) Fiscal rules in response to the crisis-toward the ‚next-generation' rules: A new dataset. IMF Working Paper No. 12/187.
• Schick, A. (2010). Post-crisis fiscal rules. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 10(2), 1-18.

Identyfikatory

DOI

DOI: 10.2478/ceej-2020-0013