Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
In their article published in a recent issue of this journal, Wysocki and Megger 2019 attempt to undermine Rothbard's welfare theory as articulated in his classic essay on the subject 2008. More specifically, they suggest that the theory in question generates some fatally counterintuitive conclusions and relies on viciously circular arguments. In this response, my aim is to demonstrate that while the article under consideration raises some interesting points, the rather monumental task that its authors set themselves - that is, the task of dismantling the whole of Austro-Rothbardian welfare economics - results in failure. (original abstract)
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Numer
Strony
25--28
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
autor
- Instytut Edukacji Ekonomicznej im. Ludwiga von Misesa
Bibliografia
- Hayek, F. A. (2002). Competition as a discovery procedure. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 5(3), 9-23.
- Mises, L. von (1996) [1949]. Human Action. 4th ed., revised. San Francisco: Fox and Wilkes.
- Oppenheimer, F. (1922) [1914]. The State. New York: B. W. Huebsch.
- Rothbard, M. N. (2008) [1956]. Toward a reconstruction of utility and welfare economics. In: M. Sennholz (ed.), On Freedom and Free Enterprise: Essays in Honor of Ludwig von Mises (224-262). Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
- Salerno, J. T. (1993). Mises and Hayek dehomogenized. Review of AustrianEconomics,6(2), 113-146.
- Wiśniewski, J. B. (2013). Non-excludability, externalities, and entrepreneurship - an overview of the Austrian theory of common goods. Journal of Prices & Markets, 1(1), 57-68.
- Wysocki, I., Megger, D. (2019). Austrian welfare theory: A critical approach. Ekonomia - Wroclaw Economic Review, 25(1), 73-80.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171604029