PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Czasopismo
2020 | 9(3/4) | 104--119
Tytuł artykułu

Reism, Concretism and Schopenhauer Diagrams

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Reism or concretism are the labels for a position in ontology and semantics that is represented by various philosophers. As Kazimierz Ajdukiewicz and Jan Woleński have shown, there are two dimensions with which the abstract expression of reism can be made concrete: The ontological dimension of reism says that only things exist; the semantic dimension of reism says that all concepts must be reduced to concrete terms in order to be meaningful. In this paper we argue for the following two theses: (1) Arthur Schopenhauer has advocated a reistic philosophy of language which says that all concepts must ultimately be based on concrete intuition in order to be meaningful. (2) In his semantics, Schopenhauer developed a theory of logic diagrams that can be interpreted by modern means in order to concretize the abstract position of reism. Thus we are not only enhancing Jan Woleński's list of well-known reists, but we are also adding a diagrammatic dimension to concretism, represented by Schopenhauer. (original abstract)
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
104--119
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Fern-Universität in Hagen, Germany
  • University of Warsaw, Poland
Bibliografia
  • Ajdukiewicz, K. ,Elementy teorii poznania' Tadeusza Kotarbińskiego, In T. Kotarbiński, Elementy teori poznania, logiki formalnej i metodologii nauk, Wrocław, Warszawa, Kraków: Zakład Narodowy imienia Ossolińskich, 1961, pp. 607-631.
  • Bellucci, F. Observational Advantages: A Philosophical Discussion, In P. Chapman, G. Stapleton, A. Moktefi, S. Perez-Kriz and F. Bellucci (eds.), Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. Diagrams 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (vol. 10871), Cham: Springer, 2018, pp. 330-335.
  • Beiser, F. C. Weltschmerz. Pessimism in German Philosophy, 1860-1900, Oxford: University Press, 2016.
  • Birnbacher, D. Schopenhauer und die Tradition der Sprachkritik, Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch (99), 2018, 37-56.
  • Demey, L. From Euler Diagrams in Schopenhauer to Aristotelian Diagrams in Logical Geometry, In J. Lemański (ed.), Language, Logic, and Mathematics in Schopenhauer, Basel: Birkhauser (Springer), 2020, pp. 181-206.
  • Dobrzański, M. Begriff und Methode bei Arthur Schopenhauer, Wurzburg: Konigshausen & Neumann, 2017.
  • Dobrzański, M. Problems in Reconstructing Schopenhauer's Theory of Meaning: With Reference to His Influence on Wittgenstein, In J. Lemanski. (ed.), Language, Logic, and Mathematics in Schopenhauer, Basel: Birkhauser (Springer), 2020, pp. 25-45.
  • Dobrzański, M., and J. Lemanski. Schopenhauer Diagrams for Conceptual Analysis, In A.-V. Pietarinen, Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. 11th International Conference, Diagrams 2020 Tallinn, Estonia, August 24-28, 2020, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (vol. 12169), Cham: Springer, 2020, pp. 281-288.
  • Fine, K. The Limits of Abstraction, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002.
  • Garewicz, J. Schopenhauer, Warszawa: Wiedza Powszechna, 1988.
  • Hauswald, R. Umfangslogik und analytisches Urteil bei Kant, Kant-Studien (101), 2010, pp. 283-308.
  • Juhos, B. Inwieweit ist Schopenhauer der Kantischen Ethik gerecht geworden? Wien: Phil. Diss., 1926.
  • Kleszcz, R. Criticism and Rationality in the Lvov-Warsaw School, In D. Kubok (ed.), Thinking Critically: What Does It Mean? The Tradition of Philosophical Criticism and Its Forms in the European History of Ideas, Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter, 2018, pp. 161-172.
  • KoBler, M. Die eine Anschauung - der eine Gedanke. Zur Systemfrage bei Fichte und Schopenhauer, In L. Huhn (ed.), Die Ethik Arthur Schopenhauers im Ausgang vom Deutschen Idealismus (Fichte/Schelling), Wurzburg: Ergon, 2006, pp. 349-364.
  • KoBler, M. Language as an 'Indispensable Tool and Organ' of Reason: Intuition, Concept and Word in Schopenhauer, In J. Lemanski (ed.), Language, Logic, and Mathematics in Schopenhauer, Basel: Birkhauser (Springer), 2020, pp. 15-24.
  • Kotarbiński, T. Reism: Issues and Prospects, Logique et Analyse 11 (44), 1968, pp. 441-458.
  • Kotarbiński, T. Przedmowa, In A. Schopenhauer, Erystyka czyli sztuka prowadzenia sporów, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie, 1973.
  • Lemanski, J. Schopenhauers Gebrauchstheorie der Bedeutung und das Kontextprinzip: Eine Parallele zu Wittgensteins >Philosophischen Untersuchungen<, Schopenhauer Jahrbuch (97), 2016, pp. 171-195.
  • Lemanski, J. Means or End? On the Valuation of Logic Diagrams, Logiko-filosofskie studii (14), 2016, pp. 98-122.
  • Moktefi, A. Schopenhauer's Eulerian diagrams, In J. Lemanski (ed.), Language, Logic, and Mathematics in Schopenhauer, Basel: Birkhauser (Springer), 2020, pp. 111-128.
  • McLaughlin, P., and O. Schlaudt. Kant's Antinomies of Pure Reason and the 'Hexagon of Predicate Negation', Logica Universalis (14), 2020, pp. 51-67.
  • Schlick, M. Nietzsche und Schopenhauer, In M. Schlick (ed. Iven, M.), Gesamtausgabe: Abteilung II: Nachgelassene Schriften, vol. 5.1, Wien, New York: Springer, 2013.
  • Schopenhauer, A. Philosophische Vorlesungen. Vol. I, In A. Schopenhauer (ed. P. Deussen and F. Mockrauer), Schopenhauers samtliche Werke. Vol. IX., Munchen: Piper, 1913.
  • Schopenhauer, A. Philosophische Vorlesungen. Vol. II, In A. Schopenhauer (ed. P. Deussen and F. Mockrauer), Schopenhauers samtliche Werke. Vol. X., Munchen: Piper, 1913.
  • Schopenhauer, A. The World as Will and Representation. Vol. 1., translated and edited by Judith Norman, Alistair Welchman and Christopher Janaway, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
  • Schopenhauer, A. Der handschriftliche Nachlass: Bd. III. Berliner Manuskripte (1818-1830), ed. by A. Hubscher, Frankfurt a.M.: W. Kramer, 1970.
  • Schopenhauer, A. Parerga and Paralipomena. Vol. 2., transl. by A. Del Caro, C. Janaway, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
  • Stapleton, G., Jamnik, M., and A. Shimojima. What Makes an Effective Representation of Information: A Formal Account of Observational Advantages, Journal of Logic, Language and Information 26 (5), 2017, pp. 143-177.
  • Tennant, N. A General Theory of Abstraction Operators, The Philosophical Quarterly 54 (214), 2004, pp. 105-133.
  • Woleński, J. The History of Epistemology, In I. Niiniluoto, M. Sintonen and J. Wolenski (eds.) Handbook of Epistemology, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 2004, pp. 3-54.
  • Woleński, J. Reism, In E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2012 Edition), URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2012/entries/reism/ (11.05.2020).
  • Xhignesse, M.-A. Schopenhauer's Perceptive Invective, In J. Lemanski (ed.), Language, Logic, andMathematics in Schopenhauer, Basel: Birkhauser (Springer), 2020, pp. 95-109.
  • Zaręba, M. Reizm Tadeusza Kotarbińskiego a prakseologiczna koncepcja sprawstwa, Przegląd Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 3 (83), 2012, pp. 559-575.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171604311

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.