Beyond the Territorial Trap?: The Geographic Interrogation of Sovereignty

• Autorzy: Matthew Derrick
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Sovereignty is now a key concept in geographic scholarship. However, sustained geographic investigation of sovereignty commenced only in the 1990s, after the collapse of the Cold War order. Early, important contributions to the interrogation of sovereignty were historical, providing rigor in understanding the dialectical relationship between space and politics in the development of the state system. By the close of the twentieth century, however, historical complementarity in important geographic tracts on sovereignty, conditioned by new geopolitics of post-communism, gave way to diverging prognostications among academic geographers on the contemporary and future nature and salience of state sovereignty. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Sovereignty; Geography; Nation-state

PL

Suwerenność; Geografia; Państwo narodowe

• Czasopismo: Journal of Geography, Politics and Society
• Rocznik: 2020
• Numer: nr 10(2)
• Strony: 10--15

Twórcy

autor

Matthew Derrick

• Humboldt State University, United States

Bibliografia

• Agnew J., 1994, The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory, Review of International Political Economy, 1(1), 53-80. doi: 10.1080/09692299408434268.
• Agnew J., 2005, Sovereignty regimes: Territoriality and state authority in contemporary world politics, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95(2), 437-461. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00468.x.
• Agnew J., 2009, Globalization and Sovereignty, Rowman & Littlefield, New York.
• Austin C., Kumar M., 1998, Sovereignty in the global economy: An evolving geopolitical concept, Geography Research Forum, 18(1), 49-64.
• Blakkisrud H., Kolstø P., 2012, Dynamics of de facto statehood: The South Caucasian de facto states between secession and sovereignty, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 12(2), 281-298.
• Borgen C.J., 2007, Imagining sovereignty, managing secession: The legal geography of Eurasia's frozen conflicts, Oregon Review of International Law, 9(1), 477-535.
• Caspersen N., 2013, Unrecognized States: The Struggle for Sovereignty in the Modern International System, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
• Castree N., 2004, Economy and culture are dead! Long live economy and culture!, Progress in Human Geography, 28(2), 204-226.
• Charron A., 2016, Whose is Crimea? Contested sovereignty and regional identity, Region, 5(2), 225-256.
• Diver S., 2018, Native water protection flows through self-determination: Understanding tribal water quality standards and "treatment as a state", Journal of Contemporary Water Research and Education, 163(1), 6-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1936- 704X.2018.03267.x.
• Held D., 2004, Global Covenant, Polity Press, Cambridge.
• Held D., 2013, Global Covenant: The Social Democratic Alternative to the Washington Consensus, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
• James A., 1984, Sovereignty: Ground rule or gibberish?, Review of International Studies, 10(1), 1-18.
• Knight, D., 1994, People together, yet apart: Rethinking territory, sovereignty, and identities, [in:] G. Demko, W. Wood (eds.), Reordering the World: Geopolitical Perspectives on the Twenty-first Century, Westview Press, Boulder, 71-86.
• Kofanov D., Shirikov A., Herrera Y.M., 2018, Sovereignty and regionalism in Eurasia, [in:] A. Paasi, J. Harrison, M. Jones (eds.), Handbook on the Geographies of Regions and Territories, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, 395-406.
• Krasner S. 1992, Realism, imperialism, and democracy: A response to Gilbert, Political Theory, 20(1), 38-52. doi: 10.1177/0090591792020001003.
• Krasner, S., 1999, Organized Hypocrisy, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
• Krasner, S., 2001, Rethinking the sovereign state model, Review of International Studies, 27(5), 17-42. doi: 10.1017/ S0260210501008014.
• Lake D.A., 2016, The Statebuilder's Dilemma: On the Limits of Foreign Intervention, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
• Luke T., 1991, The discipline of security studies and the codes of containment: Learning from Kuwait, Alternatives, 16(3), 315-344. doi: 10.1177/030437549101600302.
• Luke T., 1996, Governmentality and contragovernmentality: Rethinking sovereignty and territoriality after the Cold War, Political Geography, 15(6-7), 491-507. doi: 10.1016/0962-6298(96)00028-5.
• Mitchell D., 1995, There's no such thing as culture: Towards a reconceptualization of the idea of culture in geography, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 20(1), 102-116.
• Moisio S., 2006, Competing geographies of sovereignty, re - gionality and globalisation: The politics of EU resistance in Finland 1991-1994, Geopolitics, 11(3), 439-464. doi: 10.1080/14650040600767891.
• Murphy A., 1996, The sovereign state system as a political-territorial ideal: Historical and contemporary considerations, [in:] T. Biersteker, C. Weber (eds.), State Sovereignty as Social Construct, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 80-120.
• Osuri G., 2017, Imperialism, colonialism and sovereignty in the (post) colony: India and Kashmir, Third World Quar - terly, 38(11), 2428-2443.
• Paasi A., 2016, Dancing on the graves: Independence, hot/banal nationalism and the mobilization of memory, Political Geography, 54, 21-31. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2015.07.005.
• Petersen G., 1998, Strategic location and sovereignty: Modern Micronesia in the historical context of American expansionism, Space and Polity, 2(2), 179-205. doi: 10.1080/13562579808721779.
• Philpott D., 2001, Usurping the sovereignty of sovereignty?, World Politics, 53(2), 297-324. jstor.org/stable/25054148.
• Ranco D., Suagee D., 2007, Tribal sovereignty and the problem of difference in environmental regulation: Observations on "measured separatism" in Indian country, Antipode, 39(4), 691-707. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2007.00547.x.
• Reid-Henry S., 2007, Exceptional sovereignty? Guantánamo Bay and the re-colonial present, Antipode, 39(4), 627-648. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2007.00544.x.
• Storey D., 2017, States, territory and sovereignty, Geography, 102(3), 116-121. doi: 10.1080/00167487.2017.12094021.
• Sucharov M., 1998, Regional identity and the sovereignty principle: Explaining Israeli-Palestinian peacemaking, Geopolitics, 3(1), 177-196. doi: 10.1080/14650049808407613.
• Taylor P., 1994, The state as container: Territoriality in the modern world-system, Progress in Human Geography, 18(2), 151-162. doi: 10.1177/030913259401800202.
• Taylor P., 1995, Beyond containers: Internationality, interstateness, interterritoriality, Progress in Human Geography, 19(1), 1-15. doi: 10.1177/030913259501900101.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.26881/jpgs.2020.2.02