The Deontological Perspective of Sustainable Development

• Autorzy: Adam Płachciak , Dative Mukarutesi
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The idea of sustainable development as a normative concept emphasizes the necessity for a wider consensus on meeting human needs, ensuring social equity, and respecting planetary boundaries. The purpose of the article focuses on the deontological orientation in perceiving sustainable development. It is expected that looking at sustainability from the deontological perspective might increase individuals' awareness of responsibility towards respecting the needs of the world's poor, environmental boundaries, and moral equity, which emphasizes that all people are equal. Any attempt to achieve sustainability demands, first of all, rational action placed on moral duties/obligations before individual people or institutions can achieve their particular desires and goals. According to this perspective, sustainability should be treated as a prior constraint in obtaining economic maximization. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Sustainable development; Ethics; Human in environmental; Human needs

PL

Rozwój zrównoważony; Etyka; Człowiek w środowisku; Potrzeby człowieka

• Czasopismo: Annales : etyka w życiu gospodarczym
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: 23
• Numer: nr 1
• Strony: 83--96

Twórcy

autor

Adam Płachciak

• Wrocław University of Economics

autor

Dative Mukarutesi

• The National University of Rwanda

Bibliografia

• Buchanan, J. M. (1987). Justice and Charity. Ethics, 87(3), 558-575.
• Crocker, D. A., & Robeyns, I. (2010). Capability and Agency. In Ch. Morris, Amartya Sen. Contemporary Philosophy Focus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Crutzen, P. J., & Stoermer, E. F. (2000). The Anthropocene. Global Change Newsletter, 41, 17-18.
• Doyal, L., & Gough, I. (1991). A Theory of Human Need. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Dworkin, R. (1981). What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 10(4), 283-345.
• Ecosystems and Human Well-Being - Synthesis. A Report of the Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Washington (DC): Island Press.
• Gough, I. (2015). Climate Change and sustainable welfare. The Centrality of Human Needs. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 39(5), 1191-1214.
• Hallsmith, G. (2003). The Key to Sustainable Cities. Meeting Human Needs. Transforming Community Systems. Gambriola: New Society Publishers.
• Hart, H. L. A. (1955). Are There Any Natural Rights. Philosophical Review, 64(2), 175-191.
• Human Environment. Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment. (1982). New York-Geneva: United Nations.
• Jones, H. (2009). Equity in Development. Why It is Important and How to Achieve It. London: Overseas Development Institute.
• Kant, I. (1997). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Klosko, G. (1994). Political Obligation and the Natural Duties of Justice. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 23(3), 251-270.
• Leinfelder, R. (2013). Assuming Responsibility for the Anthropocene. Challenges and Opportunities in Education. In H. Trischler (Ed.), Anthropocene. Envisioning the Future of the Age of Humans. Munich: Rachel Carson Center for Environment and Society.
• Matviychuk, A. (2014). Ecological Deontology in the Context of Solving the Task of Ecologization of Modern Man Thinking. Problems of Sustainable Development, 9(1), 151-156. McNaughton, D., & Rawling, P. (2007). Deontology. In D. Copp (Ed.), The Ox-ford Handbook of Ethical Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens III, W. W. (1972). The Limits to Growth. The Report for the Club of Rome's on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: Universe Books.
• Mills, M. (2001). The Duty of Being and Association. In J. Berry, & M. Wissenburg (Eds.), Sustaining Liberal Democracy. Ecological Challenges and Opportunities. London: Palgrave Publishers.
• Nagel, Th. (1991). Equality and Partiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Nozick, R. (2000). Anarchia, państwo, utopia. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Aletheia.
• Rawls, J. (2005). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
• Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development "Our Common Future." (1987). Norway/Oslo: The United Nations General Assem-bly.
• Research for Social Change Transformation to Equity and Sustainability - UNRISD Strategy 2016-2020. (2015). Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
• Roberts, N. (1997). The Holocene. An Environmental History. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
• Robeyns, I. (2005). The Capability Approach: A Theoretical Survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 93-117.
• Robeyns, I. (2006). Capability Approach in Practice. Journal of Political Philoso-phy, 14(3), 351-376.
• Rockström, J., Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, III, F. S., Lambin, E., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H., Nykvist, B., De Wit, C. A., Hughes, T., van der Leeuw, S., Rodhe, H., Sör-lin, S., Snyder, P. K., Costanza, R., Svedin, U., Falkenmark, M., Karlberg, L., Corell, R. W., Fabry, V. J., Hansen, J., Walker, B., Liverman, D., Rich-ardson, K., Crutzen, P. & Foley, J. (2009). Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity. Ecology and Sociology, 14(2), 472-475.
• Scanlon, Th. (2000). What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
• Saja, K. (2015). Etyka normatywna. Między konsekwencalizmem a deontologią. Kraków: Universitas.
• Sen, A. (1982). Choice, Welfare and Measurement. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
• Sen, A. (2006). Inequality Reexamined. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Sen, A. (2009). The Idea of Justice. Cambridge (MA): The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
• Sen, A., & Williams, B. (1990). Utilitarianism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• The Nicomachean Ethics. (2009). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development: A Commentary. (2015). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.18778/1899-2226.23.1.05