Stakeholders and Performance Management Systems of Small and Medium-Sized Outpatient Clinics

• Autorzy: Piotr Korneta
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Performance management systems can be divided into those that rely considerably on significant stakeholders and that ignore stakeholders, other than the stockholders and the clients. Decision makers willing to implement and use a performance management system must decide to what extent such system should rely on various stakeholders. In this study, 10 in-depth interviews with representatives possessing significant experience with small and medium-sized outpatient clinics have been employed. The objective of this paper is to study if an efficient performance management system for small and medium-sized outpatient clinics can ignore stakeholders. The results of this study postulate performance management systems, which are not sufficiently rooted in stakeholders, are not likely to be successful for small and medium-sized outpatient clinics. Developed in this article concept acknowledges wider society and indicates significant stakeholders who cannot be ignored. The paper ends with conclusion, limitations, indications for further research, and some managerial implications. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Performance appraisal; Performance measurement; Health care; Health care protection; Medical facilities; Small business; Stakeholders

PL

Zarządzanie wynikami; Pomiar dokonań; Opieka zdrowotna; Ochrona zdrowia; Placówki służby zdrowia; Małe i średnie przedsiębiorstwa; Interesariusze

• Czasopismo: Foundations of Management
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: 12
• Numer: nr 1
• Strony: 211--222

Twórcy

autor

Piotr Korneta

• Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland

Bibliografia

• Appiah, M.K., Possumah, B.T., Ahmat, N., Sanusi, N.A, 2019. Small and Medium Enterprise's Internal Resources and Investment Decisions in Ghana: The Resource-based Approach. Economics and Sociology, 12(3), pp.37-53.
• Barnett, M.L, 2007. Stakeholder Influence Capacity and the Variability of Financial Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility, Academy of Management Review, 32(3), pp.794-816.
• Berrone, P., Surroca, J. and Tribo, J.A, 2007. Corporate Ethical Identity as a Determinant of Firm Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(1), pp.35-53.
• Bourne, M., Kennerley, M., Franco-Santos, M., 2005. Managing Through Measures: A Study of Impact on Performance. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 16(4), pp.373-395.
• Bridoux, F., Stoelhorst, J.W, 2014. Micro-foundations for Stakeholder Theory: Managing Stakeholders with Heterogeneous Motives. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), pp.107-125.
• Brewer, P., Speh, T, 2000. Using the Balanced Scorecard to Measure Supply Chain Performance. Journal of Business Logistics, 21(1), pp.75-93.
• Carter, S.M, 2006. The Interaction of top Management Group, Stakeholder, and Situational Factors on Certain Corporate Reputation Management Activities. Journal of Management Studies, 43(5), pp.1145-1176.
• Cennamo, C., Berrone, P., Gomez-Mejia, L.R, 2009. Does Stakeholder Management Have a Dark Side? Journal of Business Ethics, 89(4), pp.491-507.
• Chenhall, R.H., Langfield-Smith, K, 2007. Multiple Perspectives of Performance Measures. European Management Journal, 25(4), pp.266-82.
• Choi, Y.R., Shepard, D.A, 2005. Stakeholder Perceptions of Age and other Dimensions of Newness. Journal of Management, 31(4), pp.573-596.
• Cocca, P., Alberti, M, 2010. A Framework to Assess Performance Measurement in SMEs. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 59(2), pp.186-200.
• Cragg, W., Greenbaum, A., 2002. Reasoning about Responsibilities: Mining Company Managers on What Stakeholders Are Owed. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(3), pp.319-335.
• Emshoff, J., Freeman, R.E, 1978. Stakeholder Management. The Wharton Applied Research Center, Wharton Business School, Pennsylvania.
• Freeman, R.E, 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Pitman, Boston, MA.
• Franco-Santosa, M., Lucianettib, L., Bourne M, 2012. Contemporary Performance Measurement Systems: A Review of their Consequences and a Framework for Research. Management Accounting Research, 23(1), pp.79-119.
• Friedman, A.L., Miles, S, 2002. Developing Stakeholder Theory. Journal of Management Studies, 39(1), pp.1-21.
• Galbreath, J, 2006. Does Primary Stakeholder Management Positively Affect the Bottom Line? Some Evidence from Australia. Management Decision, 44(8), pp.1106-1121.
• Gomes, C.F.Y., Mahmoud, M., Lisboa, J.V., 2004. A Literature Review of Manufacturing Performance Measures and Measurement in an Organizational Context: a Framework and Direction for Future Research. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 15(6), pp.511-30.
• Heinicke, A., 2018. Performance Measurement Systems in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises and Family Firms: a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Management Control, 28(1), pp.457-502.
• Harrison, J.S., Wicks, A.C, 2013. Stakeholder Theory, Value, and Firm Performance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(1), pp.97-124.
• Henisz, W.J., Dorobantu, S., Nartey, L.J, 2014. Spinning Gold: the Financial Returns to Stakeholder Engagement. Strategic Management Journal, 36(5), pp.1727-1748.
• Hewko, S., Cummings, G, 2016. Performance Management in Healthcare: a Critical Analysis. Leadership in Health Services, 29(1), pp.52-68.
• Janjić, V., Todorović, M., Jovanović, D, 2015. A Comparative Analysis of Modern Performance Measurement and Management Models of Companies. Economic Themes, 53(2), pp. 298-313.
• Jazayeri, M., Scapens, R.W, 2008. The Business Values Scorecard Within BAE Systems: The Evolution of a Performance Measurement System. British Accounting Review, 40(1), pp.48-70.
• Jensen, M.C., 2002. Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory and the Corporate Objective Function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), pp.235-256.
• Kludacz-Alessandri, M., 2016. Non-financial Dimensions of Measurement and Assessment in the Performance Model for Hospitals. Managerial Economics, 17(1), pp.93-121.
• Korneta, P., 2018. The Concept of Performance Measurement and Management System for Small and Medium Size Polish Healthcare Services Providers. Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie, 19(12), pp.211-225.
• Korneta, P., 2019. Challenges of Performance Management Systems Implementations: Case Study. Przegląd Organizacji, 10(1), pp.24-31.
• Loi, T, 2016. Stakeholder Management: a case of its Related Capability and Performance. Management Decision, 54(1), pp.148-173.
• Nasseh K., Bowblis J.R., Vujicic M., Huang S.S, 2020. Consolidation in the Dental Industry: a Closer Look at Dental Payers and Providers. International Journal of Health Economics and Management, 20(1), pp.145-162.
• Neville, B.A., Menguc, B, 2006. Stakeholder Multiplicity: Toward an Understanding of the Interactions Between Stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(8), pp.377-391.
• Nieplowicz, M, 2019. The Use of Balanced Scorecard in the Assessment of Developmental Capacity of Local Government Units. Research Papers of Wrocław University of Economics, 1(544), pp.181-190.
• Nguyen L.T., Sasso A.T.L, 2020. Competition and Market Structure in the Dental Industry. International Journal of Health Economics and Management, 20(1), pp.201-214.
• Ogden, S., Watson, R., 1999. Corporate Performance and Stakeholder Management. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), pp.526-538.
• Perrini, F., Tencati, A., 2006. Sustainability and Stakeholder Management: the Need for New Corporate Performance Evaluation and Reporting Systems. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(5), pp.296-308.
• Pulakos, E.D., O'Leary R.S, 2011. Why is Performance Management Broken? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 4(2), pp.146-164.
• Rampersad H.K., 2005. Total Performance Scorecard. The way to Personal Integrity and Organizational Effecitiveness. Measuring Business Excellence, 9(3).
• Schwarzkopf, D.L., 2006. Stakeholder Perspectives and Business Risk Perception. Journal of Business Ethics, 64(4), pp.327-342.
• Sinclair, D., Zairi, M., 2000. Performance Measurement: A Critical Analysis of the Literature with Respect to Total Quality Management. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2(2), pp.145-68.
• Sim, K.L., Koh, H.C., 2001. Balanced Scorecard: a Rising Trend in Strategic Performance Measurement. Measuring Business Excellence, 5(2), pp.18-28.
• Skoczylas, W., Niemiec A, 2016. Performance Measurement System: Diagnosis of Applied Solutions in Polish Companies. Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia, 2(80), pp.149-162.
• Sundaram, A.K., Inkpen, A.C., 2004. Stakeholder Theory and the Corporate Objective Revisited: a reply. Organization Science, 15(3), pp.370-371.
• Sushil, (2010), Flexible Strategy Game-card. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 11(1/2).
• Waal, A, 2007. Successful Performance Management? Apply the Strategic Performance Management Development Cycle. Measuring Business Excellence, 11(2), pp.4-11.
• Waal, A., Kourtit, K., 2013. Performance Measurement and Management in Practice: Advantages, Disadvantages and Reasons for Use. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 62(5), pp.446-473.
• Yin, R.K., 2003. Case Study Research. Design and Methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, London.
• www.stat.gov.pl, [online] Available at https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/zdrowie/zdrowie/ambulatoryjna-opieka-zdrowotna-w-2018-roku,13,3.html [Accessed 12 December, 2019].

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/fman-2020-0016