A Content Management System as an Information Management System in Interdisciplinary Research

• Autorzy: Paweł Rola , Dorota Kuchta

Warianty tytułu

System zarządzania treścią jako system zarządzania informacją w badaniach interdyscyplinarnych

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Teams of scientific specialists have replaced independent researchers, simultaneously the research team size has increased by 50% over the 19-year period. Better collaborations between project team members might improve research outcomes or R&D project products. Knowledge needs to be communicated among a research team effectively and shared among all research team members as it is created collaboratively. Collaboration can be successfully supported by providing a knowledge sharing environment and communication facilities. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the feasibility and discuss novel communication among scientists using a content management system (CMS) which operates based on the Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) cloud-computing model. This study presents the use of CMS for the collaboration of a research team carrying out a research project funded by the Polish National Science Centre. (original abstract)

Zespoły badawcze coraz częściej zastępują niezależnych badaczy. W ciągu 19 lat wielkość zespołu badawczego wzrosła o 50%. Lepsza współpraca między członkami zespołu badawczego może poprawić wyniki badań lub produkt projektu badawczo-rozwojowego. W zespole badawczym wiedza - jeżeli jest tworzona wspólnie - musi być skutecznie przekazywana i rozpowszechniona między wszystkich jego członków. Współpraca badaczy może być z powodzeniem wspierana przez zapewnienie odpowiedniego środowiska wymiany wiedzy i udogodnień komunikacyjnych. Celem tego artykułu jest przedstawienie sposobu dzielenia się informacją w zespole badawczym przy wykorzystaniu systemu zarządzania treścią (CMS), działającego na podstawie rozwiązania chmurowego w modelu oprogramowania jako usługi (SaaS). Przedstawiono w nim także wykorzystanie CMS do wsparcia współpracy zespołu badawczego realizującego projekt badawczy finansowany przez Narodowe Centrum Nauki. (abstrakt oryginalny)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Content management; Information management; Interdisciplinarity; SaaS Model (Software as a Service); Team work; Case study

PL

Zarządzanie treścią; Zarządzanie informacją; Interdyscyplinarność; Model SaaS; Praca zespołowa; Studium przypadku

• Czasopismo: Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica
• Rocznik: 2020
• Numer: vol. 5, t. 350
• Strony: 65--81

Twórcy

autor

Paweł Rola

• Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Poland

autor

Dorota Kuchta

• Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Poland

Bibliografia

• Adams J. D., Black G. C., Clemmons J. R., Stephan P. E. (2005), Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from U. S. universities, 1981-1999, "Research Policy", vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 259-285.
• Alsayed M. H., Dahlan H. M., Hussin A. C. (2012), Knowledge sharing in collaborative research activities, "Journal of Information Systems Research and Innovation", vol. 2, pp. 1-8.
• Anatan L. (2015), Conceptual Issues in University to Industry Knowledge Transfer Studies: A Literature Review, "Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences", vol. 211, pp. 711-717, http://www .sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042815054300 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
• Baran M., Strojny J. (2013), Kompleksowe podejście do zarządzania projektami na przykładzie uczelni wyższej, "Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie", vol. 14, no. 13, pp. 247-262.
• Bekkers R., Bodas Freitas I. M. (2008), Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter?, "Research Policy", vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 1837-1853, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733308001558 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
• Benlian A., Hess T. (2011), Opportunities and risks of software-as-a-service: Findings from a survey of IT executives, "Decision Support Systems", vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 232-246.
• Boiko B. (2001), Understanding Content Management, "Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology", vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 8-13.
• Chandra P., Dong A. (2018), The relation between knowledge accumulation and technical value in interdisciplinary technologies, "Technological Forecasting and Social Change", vol. 128, pp. 235-244, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162517301397 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
• Chard K., Lidman M., McCollam B., Bryan J., Ananthakrishnan R., Tuecke S., Foster I. (2016), Globus Nexus: A Platform-as-a-Service provider of research identity, profile, and group management, "Future Generation Computer Systems", vol. 56, pp. 571-583, http://www.sciencedirect .com/science/article/pii/S0167739X1500285X [accessed: 30.05.2018].
• Charte F., Rivera A. J., Charte D., Jesus M. J. del, Herrera F. (2018), Tips, guidelines and tools for managing multi-label datasets: The mldr.datasets R package and the Cometa data repository, "Neurocomputing", vol. 289, pp. 68-85, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii /S0925231218301401 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
• Chau V. S., Gilman M., Serbanica C. (2017), Aligning university-industry interactions: The role of boundary spanning in intellectual capital transfer, "Technological Forecasting and Social Change", vol. 123, pp. 199-209, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii /S0040162516000792 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
• Chou D. C., Chou A. Y. (2007), Analysis of a new information systems outsourcing practice: Software-as-a-service business model, "International Journal of Information Systems and Change Management", vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 392-405.
• Claps G. G., Berntsson Svensson R., Aurum A. (2015), On the journey to continuous deployment: Technical and social challenges along the way, "Information and Software Technology", vol. 57, pp. 21-31, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584914001694 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
• Cockburn A. (2006), Agile Software Development, The cooperative game, second edition, 2nd ed., Anonymous Pearson Education, Boston.
• Dave B., Koskela L. (2009), Collaborative knowledge management - A construction case study, "Automation in Construction", vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 894-902, http://www.sciencedirect.com /science/article/pii/S0926580509000545 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
• Drury-Grogan M. L., Conboy K., Acton T. (2017), Examining decision characteristics & challenges for agile software development, "Journal of Systems and Software", vol. 131, pp. 248-265, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121217301103 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
• Dyer W., Wilkins A. (1991), Better Stories, Not Better Constructs, To Generate Better Theory: A Rejoinder to Eisenhardt, "Academy of Management Review", vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 613-619.
• Falk-Krzesinski H. J., Börner K., Contractor N., Fiore S.M., Hall K. L., Keyton J., Spring B., Stokols D., Trochim W., Uzzi B. (2010), Advancing the Science of Team Science, "Clinical and Translational Science", vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 263-266.
• Fergusson K. (2016), How Universities Use Atlassian Confluence, https://blog.seibert-media.com /2016/08/05/how-universities-use-atlassian-confluence/ [accessed: 27.06.2018].
• Feuerlicht G., Snášel V., Szczepaniak P., Abraham A., Kacprzyk J. (2010), Next generation SOA: Can SOA survive cloud computing?, "Advances in Intelligent Web Mastering", vol. 2, pp. 19-29.
• Figueiredo M. S.N., Pereira A. M. (2017), Managing Knowledge - The Importance of Databases in the Scientific Production, "Procedia Manufacturing", vol. 12, pp. 166-173, http://www .sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351978917306108 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
• Fox J., Gutenstein M., Khan O., South M., Thomson R. (2015), OpenClinical.net: A platform for creating and sharing knowledge and promoting best practice in healthcare, "Computers in Industry", vol. 66, pp. 63-72.
• Goode S., Lin C., Tsai J. C., Jiang J. J. (2015), Rethinking the role of security in client satisfaction with Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) providers, "Decision Support Systems", vol. 70, pp. 73-85.
• Gray P. H. (2000), The effects of knowledge management systems on emergent teams: towards a research mode, "The Journal of Strategic Information Systems", vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 175-191.
• Hall K. L., Feng A. X., Moser R. P., Stokols D., Taylor B. K. (2008), Moving the Science of Team Science Forward: Collaboration and Creativity, "American Journal of Preventive Medicine", vol. 35, no. 2, Supplement, pp. S243-S249, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii /S0749379708004169 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
• Hawedi M., Talhi C., Boucheneb H. (2018), Security as a Service for Public Cloud Tenants (SaaS), "Procedia Computer Science", vol. 130, pp. 1025-1030, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science /article/pii/S1877050918305052 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
• Hesse B. W. (2008), Of Mice and Mentors. Developing Cyber-Infrastructure to Support Transdisciplinary Scientific Collaboration, "American Journal of Preventive Medicine", vol. 35, no. 2, Supplement, pp. S235-S239.
• Huang M., Chen D. (2017), How can academic innovation performance in university-industry collaboration be improved?, "Technological Forecasting and Social Change", vol. 123, pp. 210-215, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162516300130 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
• Kim W. (2009), Cloud computing: Today and Tomorrow, "Journal of Object Technology", vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 65-72.
• Kim W., Lee J. H., Hong C., Han C., Lee H., Jang B. (2012), An innovative method for data and software integration in SaaS, "Computers and Mathematics with Applications", vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 1252-1258.
• Laleci G. B., Aluc G., Dogac A., Sinaci A., Kilic O., Tuncer F. (2010), A semantic backend for content management systems, "Knowledge-Based Systems", vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 832-843, http:// www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950705110000894 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
• Lamming M., Eldridge M., Flynn M., Jones C., Pendlebury D. (2000), Satchel: Providing access to any document, anytime, anywhere, "ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction", vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 322-352.
• Laukkarinen T., Kuusinen K., Mikkonen T. (2018), Regulated software meets DevOps, "Information and Software Technology", vol. 97, pp. 176-178, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science /article/pii/S0950584918300144 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
• Lethbridge T. C., Sim S. E., Singer J. (2005), Studying software engineers: Data collection techniques for software field studies, "Empirical Software Engineering", vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 311-341.
• Mann K. J., Murphy T. E., Wilson N., West M. (2018), Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Agile Planning Tools, https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/3872863/magic-quadrant-for-enterprise -agile-planning-tools [accessed: 26.06.2018].
• Matejun M., Szczepańczyk M. (2009), Komunikacja w zespołach projektowych - studium przypadku, [in:] A. Adamik, S. Lachiewicz (eds.), Współpraca w rozwoju współczesnych organizacji, Wydawnictwo Politechniki Łódzkiej, Łódź, pp. 230-242.
• McCutcheon D. M., Meredith J. R. (1993), Conducting case study research in operations management, "Journal of Operations Management", vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 239-256.
• Melchor-Ferrer E., Buendía-Carrillo D. (2016), Web-based system to improve resource efficiency in university departments, "Journal of Cases on Information Technology", vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1-16.
• Nakata N., Fukuda Y., Fukuda K., Suzuki N. (2005), DICOM Wiki: Web-based collaboration and knowledge database system for radiologists, "International Congress Series", vol. 1281, pp. 980-985.
• National Research Council (2015), Enhancing the effectiveness of team science, National Academies Press, Washington.
• Nonaka I., Byosiere P., Borucki C. C., Konno N. (1994), Organizational knowledge creation theory: A first comprehensive test, "International Business Review", vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 337-351, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0969593194900272 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
• Park S. H., Ungson G. R. (2001), Interfirm Rivalry and Managerial Complexity: A Conceptual Framework of Alliance Failure, "Organization Science", vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 37-53.
• Pérez-Montoro M. (2011), Theoretical perspectives on content management, [in:] N. Ferrer, J. Alfonso (eds.), Content management for e-learning, Springer, New York, pp. 3-26.
• Pinho C., Franco M., Mendes L. (2018), Web portals as tools to support information management in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review, "International Journal of Information Management", vol. 41, pp. 80-92.
• Portillo-Rodríguez J., Vizcaíno A., Piattini M., Beecham S. (2014), Using agents to manage Socio-Technical Congruence in a Global Software Engineering project, "Information Sciences", vol. 264, pp. 230-259, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020025514000152 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
• Rola P. (2018), Identyfikacja czynników sukcesu i porażki projektów badawczych, https://docs .cyfronet.pl/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=19367661 [accessed: 10.10.2018].
• Rola P.M., Kuchta D., Kopczyk D. (2016), Conceptual model of working space for Agile (Scrum) project team, "Journal of Systems and Software", vol. 118, pp. 49-63.
• Runeson P., Host M. (2008), Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering, "Empirical Software Engineering", vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 131-164.
• Ryńca R., Kuchta D. (2011), Transfer wiedzy i technologii w polskim szkolnictwie wyższym, "Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Bankowej we Wrocławiu", no. 22, pp. 87-100.
• Scandura A. (2016), University-industry collaboration and firms' R&D effort, "Research Policy", vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 1907-1922, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii /S0048733316301068 [accessed: 30.05.2018].
• Sittig D. F., Wright A., Simonaitis L., Carpenter J. D., Allen G. O., Doebbeling B. N., Sirajuddin A. M., Ash J. S., Middleton B. (2010), The state of the art in clinical knowledge management: An inventory of tools and techniques, "International Journal of Medical Informatics", vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 44-57.
• Stanford University (2017), Confluence, https://uit.stanford.edu/service/confluence [accessed: 26.06.2018].
• Stokols D., Hall K. L., Taylor B. K., Moser R. P. (2008), The Science of Team Science: Overview of the Field and Introduction to the Supplement, "American Journal of Preventive Medicine", vol. 35, no. 2, Supplement, pp. S77-S89, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article /pii/S074937970800408X [accessed: 30.05.2018].
• Svärd P. (2017), 3 - Enterprise content management (ECM), [in:] P. Svärd (ed.), Enterprise Content Management, Records Management and Information Culture Amidst e-Government Development, Chandos Publishing, Hull, pp. 25-33.
• Uniwersytet Jagielloński (2018), Confluence, https://jakosc.uj.edu.pl/pl_PL/-s-strefy/dlapelnomocnika/ ogloszenia?p_p_id=56_INSTANCE_70pHsaH66GE2&p_p_lifecycle=0&p _p_state=normal&p_p_mode=view&p_p_col_id=column-2&p_p_col_pos=2&p_p_col co unt=3&groupId=1609422&articleId=30661315 [accessed: 26.06.2018].
• Uniwersytet Warszawski (2018), Uniwersytet Warszawski: System Dashboard, https://it.jira.uw .edu.pl/ [accessed: 30.05.2018].
• Van Dijck J., Nieborg D. (2009), Wikinomics and its discontents: a critical analysis of Web 2.0 business manifestos, "New Media & Society", vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 855-874.
• Wilkin J. (2013), Finansowanie nauki i szkolnictwa wyższego w Polsce. Wybrane problemy i postulowane kierunki reform, "Studia Biura Analiz Sejmowych", vol. 3, no. 35, pp. 51-70.
• Wuchty S., Jones B. F., Uzzi B. (2007), The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge, "Science", vol. 316, no. 5827, pp. 1036-1039.
• Yli-Huumo J., Maglyas A., Smolander K. (2016), How do software development teams manage technical debt? - An empirical study, "Journal of Systems and Software", vol. 120, pp. 195-218, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016412121630053X [accessed: 30.05.2018].
• Zavale N. C., Macamo E. (2016), How and what knowledge do universities and academics transfer to industry in African low-income countries? Evidence from the stage of university-industry linkages in Mozambique, "International Journal of Educational Development", vol. 49, pp. 247-261, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059316300384 [accessed: 30.05.2018].

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.18778/0208-6018.350.04