Humanistic and Social Dimensions of Cobotization in the Context of Implementation Industry 5.0

• Autorzy: Grażyna Osika
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The aim of the article is to describe the humanistic and social dimension of the cobotization process in the context of the implementation of Industry 5.0. Design/methodology/approach: Over the past few years, researchers have focused on analyzing the phenomena associated with Industry 4.0, which has made it possible, among other things, to assess the negative consequences of the proposed approach, and as a result, the necessity to take corrective action has been recognized. This new way of understanding production processes has been called as Industry 5.0. The key threads of this approach include the use of advanced digital technologies in the production process but with a simultaneous focus on human. This is connected with massive use of human-machine cooperation, so called cobotization. The success of this plan requires an in-depth analysis of the human perspective, as the implementation of these solutions depends on it. In the present discussion, it is proposed to take into account the humanistic and social dimensions conditioning the possibility of effective use of cobots in the context of achieving the objectives of Industry 5.0. Conceptual analysis has been used, as it seems to be the most appropriate at this stage of research. Findings: As a result of the conducted analyzes, key dimensions have been identified from a human perspective, which may contribute to the successful implementation of Industry 5.0. Within the humanistic dimension, attention has been paid to the importance of the very way in which man treats technology/machines (philosophical dimension) with particular emphasis on instrumentalism, substantivism and post-phenomenalism. The forms of human-machine interaction generating different types of interaction (psychological and sociological dimensions) were also pointed out and the relationships that are crucial for human-machine cooperation, conditioning the productive effectiveness of this collaboration, were finally examined. Social implications: The article has a conceptual function; according to the applied research method it allows developing the concept of Industry 5.0, paying attention to what aspects will have to be considered in its implementation, taking into account the human-centered perspective. Originality/value: This article is addressed to all stakeholders involved in the implementation of the concept of Industry 5.0. Key in these considerations was to draw attention to the "human" dimensions of cobotization processes, affecting the effective use of human-machine collaboration in manufacturing processes. The author's contribution to the issues at hand should be considered an attempt to use existing research in philosophy of technology, psychology and sociology to develop a holistic view of the dimensions that can influence the building of different types of relationships with robots, including artificial intelligence, from coexistence and collaboration to cooperation. Overlooking dimensions related to the human perspective in these relationships may result in ineffectiveness of the technical innovations themselves.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Industry; Digital technologies; Robotization

PL

Przemysł; Technologie cyfrowe; Robotyzacja

• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2022
• Numer: z. 165
• Strony: 259--274

Twórcy

autor

Grażyna Osika

• Silesian University of Technology

Bibliografia

• 1. Alcacer, V., Cruz-Machado, V. (2019). Scanning the Industry 4.0: A Literature Review on Technologies for Manufacturing System. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 22, pp. 899-919, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2019.01.006.
• 2. Angleraud, A. et al. (2021). Coordinating Shared Task in Human-Robot Collaboration by Commands. Frontiers in Robotic and AI, 10, https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/ frobt.2021.734548/full. 271
• 3. Barney, D. (2008). Społeczeństwo sieci. Warszawa: Sic!
• 4. Berg, Ch. (2022). Industry 5.0: Industrial revolution With a Soul, https://www.clarify.io/learn/industry-5-0
• 5. Borgmann, A. (1984). Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life: A Philosophical Inquiry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• 6. Breque, M., Cotta, J., Nul, De, L., Petridis, A. (2021). Industry 5.0, Towards a sustainable, human-centric and resilient European industry. Policy brief. Brussels: European Commission.
• 7. Brynjolfsson, E., Mcafee, A. (2014). The Second Machine Age. Work. Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brillant Technologies, London-New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
• 8. Bunse, B. et al. (2014). Industrie 4.0: Smart Manufacturing for Future. Berlin: Germany Trade&Invest.
• 9. Christian, B., Griffiths, T. (2016). Algorithms to Live By: The computer Science of Human Decisions. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
• 10. Demir, K.A. et al. (2019). Industry 5.0 and Human-Robot Co-working. Procedia Computer Science , Vol. 158, pp. 688-695.
• 11. Dixson-Decleve, S. et al. (2022). Industry 5.0: A transformative Vision for Europe. Governing Systemic Transformations towards a Sustainable Industry. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
• 12. Freenberg, A. (2002) Transforming technology. Critical Theory Revisited. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press.
• 13. Freenberg, A. (2005). Critical Theory of Technology: An Overview. Tailoring Biotechnologies, Vol. 1, pp. 47-64.
• 14. Gajdzik, B., Wolniak, R. (2021). Digitalization and Innovation in the Steel Industry in Poland-Selected Tools of ICT in an Analysis of Statistical Data and a Case Study. Energies, 14(11), 3034, https://doi.org/10.3390/en14113034.
• 15. Gandomi, A., Haider, M. (2015). Beyond the hype: Big data concepts, methods, and analytics. International Journal of Information Management, 35, pp. 137-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.10.007.
• 16. Harari, Y.N. (2018). 21 Lessons for the 21st Century. London: Jonatan Cape.
• 17. Henke, N. et al. (2016). The Age of Analytics. Competing in a Data-Driven World. Brussels, San Francisco-Shanghai: McKinsey & Company.
• 18. Hjorth, S., Chrysostomou, D. (2022). Human-robot collaboration in industry environments: A literature review on non-destructive disassembly. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 73, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2021.102208.
• 19. Huang, G.Q. et al. (2021). Digital technologies and automation: the human and eco-centred foundations for the factory of the future. IEEE Robot&Automation Magazine, No. 7, pp. 174-179.
• 20. Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: four approaches. AMS Review, 10, pp. 18-26.
• 21. Janssen, Ch.P. et al. (2019). History and future of human-automation interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 131, pp. 99-107.
• 22. Kagerman, H. et al. (2013). Recommendation for implementing the strategic initiative Industrie 4.0. Final report of the Industries 4.0 Working Group. Frankfurt: National Academy and Science and Engineering.
• 23. Kildal, J. et al. (2018) Potential users'key concerns and expectations for the adoption of cobot. Procedia CIRP, 7, 21.
• 24. Kleppman, M. (2017). Designing Data-Intensive Applications: The Big Ideas Behind Reliable, Scalable and Maintainable Systems. Beijng-Boston-Farnham-Sebastopol-Tokyo: O'Reilly.
• 25. Kotler, P. (2015). Confronting Capitalism: Real Solution for a Troubled Economic System. New York: American Management Association.
• 26. Kożusznik, B. et al. (2020). Zespół pracowniczy. In: B. Rożnowski, P. Fortuna (eds.), Psychologia biznesu, e-book. Warszawa: PWN.
• 27. Krauss Lawrence, M. (2015). What Me Worry. In: J. Brockman (ed.), What to Think About Machines That Think. New York: Harper Perennial, e-book.
• 28. Lee, J., Kao, H-A. (2014). Servis Innovation and Smart Analytics for Industry 4.0 and Big Data Environment. Product Services Systems and Value Creation. Proceedings of the 6th CIRP Conference on Industrial Product-Service Systems, DOI:10.1016/j.procir. 2014.02.001
• 29. Lee, Kai-Fu, (2019). Inteligencja sztuczna, rewolucja prawdziwa. Chiny, USA i przyszłość świata. Poznań: Media Rodzina Sp. z.o.o.
• 30. Lu, Y. et al. (2021). Humans are not machines - anthropocentric human-machine symbiosis for ultra-flexible smart manufacturing. Engineering, Vol. 7, pp. 734-737.
• 31. Lu, Y. et al. (2022). Outlook on human-centric manufacturing towards Industry 5.0. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 62, pp. 612-627.
• 32. MacDougall, W. (2014). Industry 4.0. Smart Manufacturing for the Future. Berlin: Germany Trade&Invest.
• 33. Manyika, J. et al. (2017). A Future That Works: Automation, Employment and Productivity. McKinsey & Company.
• 34. Marr, B. (2018). The 4th Industrial Revolution Is Here - Are You Ready. Forbs, 13.08. 2018.
• 35. Mayer-Schönberger, V., Cukier, K. (2013). Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think. London: John Murray.
• 36. Mcafee, A., Brynjolfsson, E. (2013). Big Data: The Management Revolution. Harvard Business Review, October.
• 37. Miśkiewicz, R., Wolniak, R. (2020). Practical Application of the Industry 4.0 Concept in a Steel Company. Sustainability, 12, 5776, pp. 1-21.
• 38. Morrar, R. et al. (2017). The Fourth Industrial Revolution (Industry 4.0): A Social Innovation Perspective. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7/11, pp. 12-20.
• 39. Nahavandi, S. (2019). Industry 5.0 - A Human-Centric Solution. Sustainability, Vol. 11, 4371, pp. 1-13, doi:10.3390/su11164371.
• 40. O'Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. New York: Penguin Random House LLC.
• 41. Osika, G. (2017). Czekając na osobliwość - o modelach interpretacji techniki. Filo-Sofija. Z problemów współczesnej filozofii, No. 39(2017/4/I), pp. 65-78.
• 42. Osika, G. (2019). Social Innovation as Support for Industry 4.0. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology, Organization and Management Series, 141, pp. 289-301.
• 43. Osika, G. (2020). Datafikacja środowiska pracy a prawa człowieka. In: A. Kuzior (Ed.), Globalne konteksty poszanowania praw i wolności człowieka. Współczesne problemy i dylematy, tom 12 (pp. 235-248). Gliwice: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej.
• 44. Osika, G. (2021). Dilemmas of Social Live Algorithmization - Technological proof of Equity. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology, Organization and Management Series, 151, pp. 525-538.
• 45. Osika, G. (2022). Industry 4.0: Selected Aspects Algorithmization of Work Environment. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology, Organization and Management Series, 155, pp. 431-447.
• 46. Paliga, M., Pollak, A. (2021). Development and validation of the fluency in human-robot interactional. A two-wave study on tree perspectives of fluency. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 155, pp. 1-11, 102698. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021. 102698.
• 47. Parra, P.S. et al. (2020). Human-Robot Collaboration Systems: Components and Applications. Proceeding of the 7th International Conference of Control Systems, and Robotics, No. 150, pp. 1-9.
• 48. Piccarozzi, M., Aquilani, B., Gatti, C. (2018). Industry 4.0 in Management Studies: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 10/10, 3821, https://doi.org/10.3390/ su10103821.
• 49. Pollak, A. et al. (2020a). A Framework of Action for Implementation Industry 4.0. An Empirically Based Research. Sustainability, Vol. 12, 5789, pp. 1-17, DOI: 103390/su12145789.
• 50. Pollak, A. et al. (2020b). Stress in manual and autonomous collaboration with cobot. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 112.
• 51. Przegalińska, A. (2016). Istoty wirtualne. Jak fenomenologia zmienia sztuczną inteligencję. Kraków: Universitas.
• 52. Przegalińska, A., Jemielniak, D. (2020). Collaborative Society. Cambridge: MIT Press.
• 53. Przegalińśka, A., Oksanowicz, P. (2020). Sztuczna inteligencja. Nieludza, arcyludzka. Fenomen świata nowych technologii. Kraków: Społeczny Instytut Wydawniczy Znak.
• 54. Przegalińska, A. et al. (2019). In bot we trust: A new methodology of chatbot performance measures. Business Horizons, Vol. 62, pp. 785-797.
• 55. Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Colony-Geneva: World Economic Forum.
• 56. Segura, P. et al. (2021). Human-robot collaborative system: Structural components for current manufacturing applications. Advances in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Vol. 3, pp. 1-12.
• 57. Simões, A. et al. (2022). Designing human-robot collaboration (HRC) workspaces in industrial settings: A systematical literature review. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 62, pp. 28-43.
• 58. Stock, T., Seliger, G. (2019). Opportunities of Sustainable Manufacturing in Industry 4.0, The Changing Nature of Work. World Development Report. Washington: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
• 59. Vallor, S. (ed.) (2022). The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Technology. New York: Oxford University Press.
• 60. Wang, L., Wang, G. (2016). Big Data in Cyber-Physical System, Digital Manufacturing. I.J. Engineering and Manufacturing, 4, pp. 1-8, DOI: 10.5815/ijem.2016.04.01.
• 61. Wierzbowski, P. (2019). Cobotization as a Key Element In The Functioning of Smart Factiries And a Next Step In The Automation of Logistic Processes. Transport Economics and Logistics, Vol. 82, pp. 171-183, DOI: 10.26881/etil.2019.82.15.
• 62. Xu, X., et al. (2021). Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0 - Inception, conception and perception. Journal of Manufacturing System, Vol. 61, p. 530-535, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jmsy.2021.10.006.
• 63. Yin, S., Kaynak, O. (2015). Big Data for Modern Industry: Challenges and Trends. Proceedings of The IEEE, 103/2, pp. 143-146.
• 64. Złotowski, J. et al. (2017). Can we control it? Autonomous robots threaten human identity, uniqueness, safety, and resource. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 100, pp. 48-54.
• 65. Zysman, J., Kenney, M. (2018). The Next Phase in the Digital Revolution: Intelligent Tools, Platforms. Growth, Employment, Communication of The ACM, 61, pp. 54-63.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2022.165.19