Information Available from Mandatory Reports and the Possibility of Applying Ranking Methods: the Case of Polish Public Benefit Organizations

• Autorzy: Ewa Chojnacka-Pelowska , Dorota Górecka
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of this paper is to present the possibility of assessing the economic results of Public Benefit Organizations (PBOs) by using ranking methods. These methods may be used not only by individual donors, but also by local or central government bodies, that decide on subsidies. Due to the lack of unified reporting system for non profit organizations on a global scale, the additional aim of the paper is to present mandatory reports that must be prepared by Polish PBOs. The theoretical part of the paper is the result of critical review of the law regulations in Poland and the literature in the field of non-profit reporting. The case study part of the paper is based on the example of PBOs from one of Polish voivodeships, operating in the field of 'Sport and recreation'. In the analysis conducted an approach called MAMIMCA - Multiple Assessment Multiple Importance Multiple Criteria Analysis - was used to determine the most suitable PBOs for co-funding. In the evaluation performed nineteen different criteria were taken into account, two well-known multi-criteria decision-aiding (MCDA) techniques were used (PROMETHEE II and TOPSIS) and two various vectors of weights were applied. As a result, the ranking of ten selected PBOs was received allowing to obtain a comprehensive picture of entities considered.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Non-profit organisations; Grants; Public benefit organisation

PL

Organizacje non-profit; Dotacje; Organizacje pożytku publicznego

• Czasopismo: Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: 11
• Numer: nr 4
• Strony: 45--67

Twórcy

autor

Ewa Chojnacka-Pelowska

• Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń

autor

Dorota Górecka

• Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń

Bibliografia

• Accounting Act of 29th September 1994 (Journal of Laws of 1994, no 121, item 591 with amendments).
• Brans J.P., & Mareschal, B. (2005). PROMETHEE Methods. In J. Figueira, S. Greco, M. Ehrgott [Eds.]. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. Springer: New York, 163-195.
• Brans, J.P., & Vincke, P. (1985). A preference ranking organization method: the PRO METHEE method for multiple criteria decision-making. Management Science, 31, 647-56.
• Brans, J.P., Vincke, P., & Mareschal, B. (1986). How to select and how to rank projects: the PROMETHEE method. European Journal of Operational Research, 24, 228-38.
• Charity Navigator - A Guide to Charity Navigator's Ratings Framework and Methodology, https://www.charitynavigator.org/about-us/our-methodology/ratings/ (accessed: 10.11.2022).
• Chojnacka, E. (2020). One percent of personal income tax as a source of revenue in pub lic benefit organisations. Ekonomia i Prawo, 19, 449-465. https://doi.org/10.12775/ EiP.2020.030.
• Chojnacka, E., & Górecka, D. (2016). Evaluating public benefit organizations in Poland with the EVAMIX method for mixed data. Multiple Criteria Decision Making, 11, 36- 50. https://doi.org/10.22367/mcdm.2016.11.03.
• Chojnacka, E., & Górecka, D. (2017). Application of MCDA methods in the performance evaluation of Public Benefit Organisations. Optimum. Studia Ekonomiczne, 93-105. https://doi.org/10.15290/ose.2017.03.87.07.
• Chojnacka, E., & Górecka, D. (2018). Ranking charities using Multi Actor Multi Criteia Analysis methodology: the case of Public Benefit Organizations in Poland. In C. Macharis & G. Baudry (Eds.). Decision-making for Sustainable Transport and Mobility: Multi Actor Multi Criteria Analysis. Edward Elgar Publishing, 211-231.
• Chojnacka, E., & Miścikowska, D. (2018). Sprawozdanie z działalności jako uzupełniające źródło informacji o fundacji: zakres i ocena przydatności w rozpatrywanych fundacjach. (Performance report as a supplementary source of information about foundation: scope and assessment of usefulness in the surveyed foundations). Prace Nau-kowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 64-72. https://doi.org/10.15611/ pn.2018.533.06.
• Czaja-Cieszyńska, H. (2017). Sprawozdanie finansowe organizacji pozarządowych w Polsce w latach 1994-2017. (The financial statement of non-governmental organizations in Poland in the years 1994-2017). Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie, 341, 99-109.
• Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., & Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method. Computers & Operations Research, 22(7), 763-770. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H.
• Dyczkowski, T. (2015a). Mierniki dokonań organizacji pożytku publicznego. Możliwości i ograniczenia stosowania. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 398, 146-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.15611/pn.2015.398.13.
• Dyczkowski, T. (2015b). Financial and non-financial information in performance assessment of public benefit organizations. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 398, 134-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.15611/pn.2015.398.12
• Dyczkowski, T. (2016). Applying Text Mining to Analyze the Performance of PBOs on the Basis of Their Obligatory Annual Activity Statements. Problemy Zarzadzania, 14(4 (63)), 123-138. https://doi.org/10.7172/1644-9584.63.9.
• Frumkin, P., & Kim, M.T. (2001). Strategic Positioning and the Financing of Nonprofit Organizations: Is Efficiency Rewarded in the Contributions Marketplace?, Public Administration Review, 61(3), 266-275.
• Goldmann, K. (2021). Sectoral analysis of Polish sports clubs with the public benefit organization status. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 21, 2769-2775. https:// doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2021.05368.
• Górecka, D. (2011). On the choice of method in multi-criteria decision aiding process concerning European projects. In T. Trzaskalik & T. Wachowicz (Eds.). Multiple Criteria Decision Making '10-11. Publisher of The University of Economics in Katowice: Katowice, 81-103.
• Górecka, D. (2012). Applying multi-criteria decision aiding techniques in the process of project management within the wedding planning business. Operations Research and Decisions, 22, 41-67.
• Górecka, D. (2020). Selecting the right football club to sponsor: multi-criteria analysis. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 20 suppl. 5, 2867-2874. https://doi. org/10.7752/jpes.2020.s5389.
• Górecka, D., & Chojnacka, E. (2017). Organizations of public benefit: performance evaluation using MCDA approach. Croatian Operational Research Review, 8, 613-629. https://doi.org/10.17535/crorr.2017.0040.
• Hwang, C.L., & Yoon K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
• Liżewski, S., & Ostapowicz, E. (2022). Finanse i sprawozdania organizacji pozarządowych. (Finances and reports of non-profit organizations). C.H. Beck.
• Mamcarczyk, M., & Zieniuk, P. (2020). Funding of Public Benefit Activity with 1% of Personal Income Tax Scheme: Empirical Research. Central European Management Journal, 28(4), 86-106. https://doi.org/10.7206/cemj.2658-0845.36.
• Nadolna, B., & Rydzewska, M. (2021). Rachunkowość i podatki w organizacjach pozarządowych. (Accounting and taxes in non-profit organizations). Wolters Kluwer.
• Oliński, M., & Szamrowski, P. (2020). Entrepreneurial activities of public benefit organizations. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 8(1), 853-867. http://doi. org/10.9770/jesi.2020.8.1(57).
• Penley, P. (2012). Nonprofit performance evaluation: financial management. Alliance Magazine, http://www.alliancemagazine.org/blog/nonprofit-performance-evaluation-financial-management-part-2-of-6/ (accessed: 10.01.2017).
• Piechota, G. (2015). Legislation on Financing Public Benefit Activities from Tax Designation in Poland. International Journal of Not-for-Profit Law, 17(1), 86-91.
• Regulation of the Chairman of the Public Benefit Committee of October 24, 2018 on specimen of the annual performance report and the annual simplified performance report for public benefit organizations, (Journal of Laws of 2018, item 2061).
• Roszkowska, E. (2011). Multi-criteria decision making models by applying the TOPSIS method to crisp and interval data. In T. Trzaskalik & T. Wachowicz (Eds.). Multiple Criteria Decision Making '10-11. Publisher of The University of Economics in Katowice: Katowice, 200-230.
• Statistics Poland, News Release (2021). Activities of associations and similar social organizations, foundations, faith-based charities, country housewives associations as well as business and professional associations in 2020 - preliminary results, https://stat.gov.pl/en (accessed: 8.11.2022).
• The Act of law of 24th April 2003 on Public Benefit and Volunteer Work, (Journal of Laws of 2003, no 96, item 873 with amendments).
• The non-profit sector in 2020. Associations, foundations, faith-based charities, business and professional associations, Statistical Analyses, Statistics Poland 2022, stat.gov.pl (accessed: 3.11.2022).
• Trussel, J.M., & Parsons, L.M. (2008). Financial reporting factors affecting donations to charitable organizations. Advances in Accounting, 23, 263-285. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S0882-6110(07)23010-X.
• Waniak-Michalak, H., & Zarzycka, E. (2012). Performance Measurement of Public Benefit Organizations on the Basis of Information from Financial Statements and Its Influence on Their Results. Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości, 68(124), 147-160.
• Żak, P. (2012). Public Benefit Status in Poland. Review of existing legislation. National Federation of Polish NGOs. Public Benefit Status in V4 countries and Germany - conference in Prague 21.09.2012. Available at: http://ofop.eu/sites/ofop.eu/files/ biblioteka-pliki/pzak_public_benefit_and_ngo_in_poland_20120921.pdf (accessed: 27.06.2016).
• (www1) https://niw.gov.pl/opp/sprawozdania-opp/ (accessed: 4.11.2022)

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12775/CJFA.2022.018