Return of Japan? Transformation of the Balance of Power in the Asian Theatre

• Autorzy: Paweł Pasierbiak , Bruce A. Kibler
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Since in the early seventies after the Japanese economy had been rebuilt from the destruction of WWII and had become competitive based on preeminent manufacturing and infrastructure, high technological advancement, networked production and distribution networks, Japan has been considered the leading power base in Asia from the early 1970's. After an initial competitive phase with the US, Japan and the U.S. have maintained a long standing economic and political relationship. However, the continued outsourcing of US manufacturing to low cost countries, specifically to China, an evolving balance of power can be clearly observed since China's opening up to foreign trade and investment and implementing free-market reforms in 1979. This article examines the economic developments over the last two decades (2000-2019), coincident with China's joining the World Trade Organization (as well as the dot.com bubble and the 2008 Recession) and its rise in economic and political might to determine how Japan's role may develop in the future. The article begins with an examination of political power theory and moves to specific economic indicators over the time period in question (2000-2019) as well as drawing on current political and economic developments from the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) to the lackluster Japanese economic growth and development and increase in debt/GDP. The text contrasts the US theoretical model (Kindleberger, Krasner & Gilpin), which represents a field balanced by hegemonic stability, as opposed to the UK model (Cohen, Strange) which is based more on a framework of cooperation and a more theoretical examination of power. It is posited that national power has increasingly ceded to global corporate power (Stopford, Henley, Strange). Against this theoretical background the economic indicators of the region are examined from 2000-2019. The analysis carried out in the study is based on several research methods: a critical analysis of the literature, a descriptive method, and a method of inference based on statistical data. Trade and FDI flows in the region are presented and examined to make assumptions on the waxing or waning influence of the players. It was found that there is neither specific evidence that Japan will recede in relative importance nor garner increased relevance. Finally, there is an ensuing discussion of geopolitical factor which are analyzed within the current developmental context, which have the potential to greatly influence future economic and political power in the region, and beyond. Specific policy measures are beyond the scope of this paper. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Economic development; Politics

PL

Rozwój gospodarczy; Polityka

• Czasopismo: Journal of International Studies
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: 14
• Numer: nr 3
• Strony: 191--204

Twórcy

autor

Paweł Pasierbiak

• Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin, Poland

autor

Bruce A. Kibler

• Gannon University, United States

Bibliografia

• Beeson, M., & Murray, P. (2020). Testing Times for Regionalism: Coping with Great Power Rivalry in the Asia-Pacific. Asian Studies Review, 44(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2020.1681052
• Blackwill, R. D., & Zelikow, P. (2021). The United States, China, and Taiwan: A Strategy to Prevent War. In Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved from https://jstor.proxy.undip.ac.id/stable/resrep28673
• Bremmer, I. (2019). The End of the American International Order: What Comes Next? Retrieved November 23, 2019, from Time website: https://time.com/5730849/end-american-order-what-next/
• Caballero-Anthony, M. (2014). Understanding ASEAN's centrality: Bases and prospects in an evolving regional architecture. Pacific Review, 27(4), 563-584. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2014.924227
• ChinaPower Project. (2021). What Does China Really Spend on its Military? Retrieved March 19, 2021, from https://chinapower.csis.org/military-spending/
• Cohen, B. J. (2007). The transatlantic divide: Why are American and British IPE so different? Review of International Political Economy, 14(2), 197-219. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290701288277
• Deudney, D., & Ikenberry, G. J. (1999). The Nature and Sources of Liberal International Order. Review of International Studies, 25, 179-196.
• Dollar, D., & Stromseth, J. (2021). US must urgently rethink its economic policies in Asia.
• Gao, M. H. (2018). Globalization 5.0 Led by China: Powered by Positive Frames for BRI. In W. Zhang, I. Alon, & C. Lattemann (Eds.), China's Belt and Road Initiative: Changing the Rules of Globalization (pp. 321-335). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75435-2_17
• Gilpin, R. (1975). U.S. Power and the Multinational Corporation. New York: Basic Books.
• Gilpin, R. (1981). War and Change in World Politics. Retrieved from http://ir.obihiro.ac.jp/dspace/handle/10322/3933
• Gilpin, R. (2001). Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Economic Order. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.00006
• Harold, S. W. (2015). How Can Japan Improve Relations with South Korea? Asia-Pacific Review, 22(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13439006.2015.1038886
• Hui, M. (2021). Japan's rare earths strategy has lessons for US, Europe. Retrieved April 24, 2021, from Quartz website: https://qz.com/1998773/japans-rare-earths-strategy-has-lessons-for-us-europe/
• Ikenberry, G. J. (2016). Between the Eagle and the Dragon: America, China, and Middle State Strategies in East Asia. Political Science Quarterly, 131(1), 9-43. https://doi.org/10.1002/polq.12430
• Kang, D. C. (2003). Getting Asia Wrong. International Security, 27(4), 57-85.
• Kang, D. C. (2007). China Rising. Peace, Power, and Order in East Asia. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Kaufman, S. J., Little, R., & Wohlforth, W. C. (2007). Introduction: Balance and Hierarchy in International Systems. In S. J. Kaufman, R. Little, & W. C. Wohlforth (Eds.), Balance of Power in World History. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230591684
• Keohane, R. O. (1980). The Theory of Hegemonic Stability and Changes in International Regimes, 1967-1977. In O. R. Holsti, R. M. Siverson, & A. L. George (Eds.), Change in the International System (pp. 131-162). Boulder: Westview Press.
• Keohane, R. O. (1984). After Hegemony. Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Kim, J. (2019). Moon demands Japan drop South Korea export controls. Retrieved March 2, 2021, from Nikkei Asia website: https://asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/Japan-South-Korea-rift/Moon-demands-Japan-drop-South********Korea-export-controls
• Kindleberger, C. P. (1973). The World in Depression, 1929-39. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Krasner, S. D. (1976). State Power and the Structure of International Trade. World Politics, 28(3), 317-347. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009974
• Lendon, B. (2021). China has built the world's largest navy. Now what's Beijing going to do with it? Retrieved April 26, 2021, from https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/05/china/china-world-biggest-navy-intl-hnk-ml********dst/index.html
• McGuirk, R. (2021). Australia ends China deals on national interest grounds. Retrieved April 24, 2021, from Canadian Press website: https://ca.news.yahoo.com/australia-ends-chinese-deals-national-114814734.html
• Nohara, Y., & Takeo, Y. (2021). Japan's Exports Jump Most Since 2017 Amid Global Trade Recovery. Retrieved April 24, 2021, from Bloomberg website: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/japan-exports-jump-double-digits********000655364.html?soc_src=social-sh&soc_trk=ma
• OECD-WTO. (2021). Trade in value added. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/data-00648-en
• Pew Research Center. (2016). Hostile Neighbors: China vs. Japan. Retrieved from www.pewresearch.org
• Pew Research Center. (2018). Despite Rising Economic Confidence, Japanese See Best Days Behind Them and Say Children Face a Bleak Future. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2018/11/12/despite-rising-economic********confidence-japanese-see-best-days-behind-them-and-say-children-face-a-bleak-future/
• Snidal, D. (1985). The Limits of Hegemonic Stability Theory. International Organization, 39(4), 579-614.
• Stopford, J. M., Strange, S., & Henley, J. S. (1991). Rival States, Rival Firms. Competition for World Market Shares. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Strange, S. (1987). The Persistent Myth of Lost Hegemony. International Organization, 41(4), 551-574.
• Strange, S. (1994). States and Markets. London, New York: Continuum.
• Strange, S. (1998). The Retreat of the State. The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Tonby, O., Woetzel, J., Choi, W., Eloot, K., Dhawan, R., Seong, J., & Wang, P. (2019). The Future of Asia. Asian Flows and Networks are Defining the Next Phase of Globalization.
• UNCTAD. (2021a). Foreign direct investment: Inward and outward flows and stock, annual. Retrieved March 13, 2021, from https://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/TableViewer/tableView.aspx
• UNCTAD. (2021b). UNCTADStat Database. Retrieved February 23, 2021, from https://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/ReportFolders/reportFolders.aspx?sCS_ChosenLang=en
• Yoshimatsu, H. (2021). Japan's Asian Diplomacy. Power Transition, Domestic Politics, and Diffusion of Ideas. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Zhao, Q. (2004). Japan's Leadership Role in East Asia: Cooperation and Competition between Japan and China. Policy and Society, 23(1), 111-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1449-4035(04)70029-6

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.14254/2071-8330.2021/14-3/12