Podstawowe problemy mierzenia jakości w inżynierii oprogramowania

• Autorzy: Dariusz Dymek

Warianty tytułu

Fundamental Problems of Quality Measurement in Software Engineering

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

Problem jakości oprogramowania komputerowego i jej pomiaru jest niedoceniony w środowisku twórców oprogramowania. Niemniej jednak coraz większe wymagania użytkowników oraz rola oprogramowania komputerowego w życiu codziennym sprawiają, że problem ten jest coraz częściej dostrzegany. Niniejsza praca przybliża aktualny stan wiedzy w dziedzinie jakości oprogramowania i przedstawia podstawowe problemy związane z mierzeniem jakości oprogramowania. (abstrakt oryginalny)

EN

The issue of computer software quality and its measurement is rather underestimated by software designers. Nevertheless, growing users demands and increasing role of software in everyday life cause that this problem becomes more and more significant. The study outlines a current state in the domain of software quality and presents basic problems concerning software quality measurement. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

PL

Oprogramowanie komputerowe; Jakość oprogramowania

EN

Computer software; Software quality

• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe / Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie
• Rocznik: 2010
• Numer: nr 814
• Strony: 5--18

Twórcy

autor

Dariusz Dymek

• Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie

Bibliografia

• Antoniol G. i in. [2004], Assessing Staffing Needs for a Software Maintenance Project through Queuing Simulation, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, nr 30(1).
• Basili V.R., Caldiera G., Rombach H.D. [1995], The Goal Question Metric Approach, Institute for Advanced Computer Studies, Department of Computer Science, University of Maryland, College Park, USA.
• Birk A., Solingen R., Jarvinen J. [1998], Business Impact, Benefit, and Cost of Applying GQM in Industry: An In-depth, Long-term Investigation at Schlumberger RPS, 5th International Symphosium on Software Metrics, Bethesda, Maryland, November 19-21.
• Briand L., El Emam K.E., Morasca S. |1995a], On the Application of Measurement Theory in Software Engineering, International Software Engineering Research Network, ISERN-95-04, "Empirical Software Engineering", vol. 1, nr 1.
• Briand L., El Emam K.E., Morasca S. [1995b], Theoretical and Empirical Validation of Software Product Measures, International Software Engineering Research Network, ISERN-95-03, Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering, Germany.
• Briand L., Morasca S., Basili V.R. [1996], Property-based Software Engineering Measurement, Technical Report CS-TR-3368-1, University of Maryland, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 22, nr 1.
• Briand L., Morasca S., Basili V.R. [2002], An Operational Process for Goal-driven Definition of Measure, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 28, nr 12.
• Clements P.C., McGregor J.D., Cohen A.G. [2005], The Structure Intuitive Model for Product Line Economics, Technical Report, CMU/SEI-2005-TR-003, Pittsburgh.
• CMMI for Development [2006], version 1.2, Technical Report CMU/SEI-2006-TR-008.
• Cote M.A. i in. [2004], Evolving a Corporate Software Quality Assessment Exercise: A Migration Path to ISO/I EC 9126, "Software Quality Process", vol. 6, nr 3.
• DA Pam 73-1 Test and Evaluation in Support of Systems Acquisition [2003], US Department of Defence, May.
• Dromey R.G. [1994], A Model for Software Product Quality, Australian Software Quality Research Institute, October, http://www-sqi.cit.gu.edu.au.
• Dromey R.G. [1998], Software Product Quality: Theory, Model and Practice, Australian Software Quality Research Institute, March, Queensland.
• Dymek D. [2000], Wybrane metody analizy danych w modelach predykcyjnych, Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Ekonomicznej w Krakowie, Kraków, nr 551.
• Grey A.R., MacDonell S.G. [1997a], A Comparison of Techniques for Developing Predictive Models of Software Metrics, "Information and Software Technology", nr 39.
• Grey A.R., MacDonell S.G. [1997b], GQM++ A Full Life Time Cycle Framework for the Development and Implementation of Software Metric Program, Proceedings of ACOSM'97 4th Australian Conference on Software Metrics, Canberra, ASMA.
• Goethert W., Hayes W. [2001], Experience in Implementing Measurement Programs, Technical Note CMU/SEI-2001-TN-026, Pittsburgh.
• Goethert W., Siviy J. [2004], Applications of the Indicator Temple for Measurement and Analysis, Technical Note CMU/SEI-2004-TN-024, Pittsburgh.
• Guidelines for Successful Acquisition and Management of Software-intensive Systems, Version 3 [2000], Department of the Air Force, Software Technology Support Center.
• Hitz M., Montazeri B. [1996], Chidamber and Kemerer's Metric Suite: A Measurement Theory Perspective, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 22, nr 4.
• Irdi A., Abran A. Khoshgoftaar T.M. [2002], Estimating Software Project Effort by Analogy Based on Linguistic Value, Proceedings of 8th IEEE Symposium on Software Metric, Ottawa.
• ISO/IEC 9126-1:2001, Software Engineering - Software Product Quality - Part 1: Quality Model, International Organization for Standardization.
• ISO/IEC 9126-4:2001, Software Engineering - Software Product Quality - Part 4: Quality in Use Metrics, International Organization for Standardization.
• ISO/IEC 9126-2:2003, Software Engineering - Software Product Quality - Part 2: External Metrics, International Organization for Standardization.
• ISO/IEC 9126-3:2003, Software Engineering - Software Product Quality - Part I: Internal Metrics, International Organization for Standardization.
• Kan S.H. [2003], Metrics and Models in Software Quality Engineering - 2nd Edition, Addison Wesley Professional, Reading, MA.
• Kitchenham B., Pfleeger S.L., Fenton N. [19951, Towards a Framework for Software Measurement Validation, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 21, nr 12.
• Kramerer C.F. (1987], An Empirical Validation of Software Cost Estimation Models, Communications of the ACM, vol. 30.
• McAndrews D.R. [1993], Establishing a Software Measurement Process, Report CMU/ SEI-93-TR-16, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, July.
• Mockus A., Weiss D., Zhang P. [2003], Understanding and Predicting Effort in Software Projects [w:] Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE.
• Morasca S. i in. [1997], Comments on "Toward, a Framework for Software Measurement Validation", IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 23, nr 3.
• Poels G., Dedene G. [1997], Comments on "Property-based Software Engineering Measurement", IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 23, nr 3.
• Practical Software Measurement - A Guide to Objective Program Insight [1996], Joint Logistic Commanders, Joint Group on System Engineering, US Department of Defence, version 2.1.
• Software Measurement Guidebook [1995], Software Engineering Laboratory Series SEL- -94-102, NASA, Washington, June.
• Szyjewski Z. [1994], Komputerowe wspomaganie tworzenia systemów informatycznych, Szczecin.
• Turski W.M. [1978], Metodologia programowania, WNT, Warszawa.
• Wal lance D.R., Ippolito L.M., Cuthill B. [1996], N 1ST Special Publication 500-234 Reference Information for Software Verification and Validation Process, US Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, NIST, Computer Systems Laboratory, Washington, March.
• Zuse H. [1997], Replay to "Property-based Software Engineering Measurement", IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 23, nr 8.