Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2009 | nr 1 (22) | 5--54
Tytuł artykułu

Income Distribution, Growth and Wellbeing : Evidence of a Quantitative Approach for Selected OECD Countries

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
In this paper we provide evidence on the cross-country and intertemporal dynamics of aggregate welfare. Firstly, we apply and compare alternative inequality indexes to have an insight on the actual within-country income distribution. The same measures, combined with information on average incomes, are then used to quantify the impact of inequality on social welfare and to obtain a comparative assessment of well-being levels, determined according to Bernoulli’s hypothesis, across space and time. The empirical application has been carried out on 10 selected OECD countries for the period 1970-2000, using a dataset that combines comparable data on per capita incomes from Penn World Tables with income distribution information drawn from the World Income Inequality Database. The results obtained highlight how inequality-accounting welfare measures significantly modify the perception of well-being, affecting both the within-country evolution of aggregate welfare and inter-countries well-being levels. Finally, for selected sub-periods, the issue of progressivity of income growth process has been considered to evaluate whether or not income growth leads to lower inequality over time. (original abstract)
Opis fizyczny
  • University of Perugia, Italy
  • University of Perugia, Italy
  • University of Perugia, Italy
  • Ackland, R., Dowrick, S., Freyens, B., Measuring Global Poverty: Why PPP Methods Matter, Paper presented at the Conference of the International Association for Research in Income and Wealth (August 26), Cork, Ireland, 2004.
  • Ahluwalia, M., Chenery, H., The economic framework, in Redistribution with Growth, ed. by H. Chenery, et al. Oxford University Press, London, 1974.
  • Araar, A., Duclos, J.-Y., An Atkinson-Gini family of social evaluation functions, “Economics Bulletin”, 3, pp. 1-16, 2003.
  • Araar, A., Duclos, J.-Y., An Atkinson-Gini Family of Social Evaluation Functions: Theory and Illustration using Data from the Luxembourg Income Study, LIS Working Paper 416, 2005.
  • Arrow, K. J., Social Choice and Individual Values. Yale University Press, New Haven, 1951.
  • Atkinson, A. B., On The Measurement of Inequality, “Journal of Economic Theory”, 2, pp. 244–263, 1970.
  • Atkinson, A. B., Brandolini, A., Promise and pitfalls in the use of ‘secondary’ datasets: income inequality in OECD countries as a case study, “Journal of Economic Literature”, 39, pp. 771–99, 2001.
  • Becker, G. S., Murphy, K. M., Werning, I.,The equilibrium distribution of income and the market for status, “Journal of Political Economy”, 113, pp. 282–310, 2005.
  • Bergson, A., A Reformulation of Certain Aspects of Welfare Economics, “Quarterly Journal of Economics”, 52, pp. 310–334, 1938.
  • Bernoulli, D. (1738) Specimen theoriae novae de mensura sortis [published in English as: Exposition of a New Theory on the Measurement of Risk, 1954, Econometrica, 22, pp. 23-36].
  • Bhalla, S., Imagine There’s No Country: Poverty, Inequality, and Growth in the Era of Globalization, Institute for International Economics, Washington DC, 2002.
  • Boulding, K. E., Economics as a Science. McGraw-Hill, New York 1970.
  • Champernowne, D. G., A comparison of measures of inequality of income distribution, “The Economic Journal”, pp. 787-816, 1974.
  • Champernowne, D. G., The Graduation of lncome Distributions, “Econometrica”, 1952.
  • Chen, S., Ravallion, M., How Did the World’s Poorest Fare in the 1990s?, “Review of Income and Wealth”, 47(3), pp. 283-300, 2001.
  • Chen, S., Datt, G., Ravallion, M., PØVCAL, A program for calculating poverty measures for grouped data, Poverty and Human Resource Division, World Bank, 2001.
  • Crosara, A. A., La distribuzione dei redditi familiari nel pregiudizio e nel fatto contrapposti mediante modelli plastici, Studium, Roma 1959.
  • Dagum, C., On the relationship between income inequality measures and social welfare functions, “Journal of Econometrics”, 43, pp. 91–102, 1990.
  • Dalton, H., The Measurement of Inequality of Incomes, “Economic Journal”, 30, pp. 348-361, 1920.
  • d'Aspremont, C., Axioms for social welfare orderings, in Hurwicz, L., Schmeidler, D., Sonnenschein, H. (eds.): Social Goals and Social Organization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 19-76, 1985.
  • Datt, G., Computational Tools for Poverty Measurement and Analysis, International Food Policy Research Institute, Food Consumption and Nutrition Division Discussion Paper No. 50. 1998.
  • De Sismondi, C. S., Political economy and the philosophy of government. 1847.
  • Deininger, K., Squire, L., A new data set measuring income inequality, “The World Bank Economic Review”, 10(3), pp. 565-591, 1996.
  • Deininger, K., Squire, L., New ways of looking at old issues: inequality and growth, “Journal of Development Economics”, 57, 259–87, 1998.
  • Dhongde, S., On the Bias of Estimating Lorenz Curve Parameters, mimeo, Department of Economics, University of California, Riverside, 2004.
  • Dollar, D., Kraay, A., Growth is good for the poor, “Journal of Economic Growth”, 7, pp. 195-225, 2002.
  • Duesenberry, J. S., Income, Savings and the Theory of Consumer Behavior. Harvard University Press, 1952.
  • Ebert, U., Measurement of inequality: an attempt at unification and generalization, “Social Choice and Welfare”, 5, pp. 147-169, 1988.
  • Frank, R. H., The demand for unobservable and other nonpositional goods, “American Economic Review”, 75, pp. 101–116, 1985.
  • Gini, C., Variabilità e mutabilità, Bologna, Italy, 1912.
  • Graaf, J. de V., Theoretical Welfare Economics. Cambridge University Press, London, 1957.
  • Gruen, C., Klasen, S., Growth, income distribution and well-being in transition countries, “Economics of Transition”, 9, pp. 359–94, 2001.
  • Gruen, C., Klasen, S., Growth, inequality, and well-being: intertemporal and global comparisons, CESifo Economic Studies, 49, pp. 617–59, 2003.
  • Gruen, C., Klasen, S., Growth, inequality, and welfare: comparisons across space and time, “Oxford Economic Papers”, 60, pp. 212-236, 2007.
  • Heston, A., Summers, R., Aten, B. (2002) Penn world table version 6.1, Center for International Comparisons at the University of Pennsylvania (CICUP)
  • Hey, J. D., Lambert P. J., Relative Deprivation and the Gini Coefficient: Comment, “Quarterly Journal of Economics”, 95, pp. 567–573, 1980.
  • Hopkins, E., Inequality, happiness and relative concerns: What actually is their relationship?, “Journal of Economic Inequality”, 6, pp. 351-372, 2008.
  • Jenkins, S. P., Trends in real income in Britain: a microeconomic analysis, “Empirical Economics”, 22, pp. 483–500, 1997.
  • Klasen, S., Growth and well-being: introducing distribution-weighted growth rates to reevaluate U.S. post-war economic performance, “Review of Income and Wealth”, 40, pp. 251–72, 1994.
  • Kolm, S. C., The optimal production of social justice, in Margolis, J. and Guitton, H. (eds.),Public Economics. MacMillan, London, pp. 145–200, 1969.
  • Lambert, P., The Distribution and Redistribution of Income. Basil Blackwell, London, 1989.
  • Lorenz, M. O., Methods of measuring the concentration of wealth, “Journal of the American Statistical Association”, 70, pp. 209–219, 1905.
  • Lovell, M. C., Inequality within and among nations, “Journal of Income Distribution”, 8, pp. 5-44, 1998.
  • Lundberg, M., Squire, L., The simultaneous evolution of growth and inequality, “The Economic Journal”, 113, pp. 326-344, 2003.
  • Malthus, T. R., An Essay on the Principle of Population. 1826.
  • Mill, J. S., On social freedom, “Oxford and Cambridge Review”, 1907.
  • Minoiu, C., Reddy, S., “Kernel Density Estimation in Poverty and Inequality Analysis: Validity and Robustness”, mimeo, Department of Economics, Columbia University, 2006.
  • Minoiu, C., Reddy, S., The Assessment of Poverty and Inequality through Parametric Estimation of Lorenz Curves: An Evaluation, “Journal of Income Distribution”, forthcoming, 2007.
  • Pigou, A. C., Wealth and Welfare. Macmillan, London, 1912.
  • Pigou, A.C. (1952) Essays in economics, Macmillan, London.
  • Rablen, M. D., Relativity, Rank and the Utility of Income, “The Economic Journal”, 118, pp. 801-821, 2008.
  • Ravallion, M., Chen, S., Measuring pro-poor growth, “Economics Letters”, 78, 93-99, 2003.
  • Rawls, J. A., A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press, 1971.
  • Rignano, E., Di un socialismo in accordo con la dottrina liberale, Bocca, 1901.
  • Robbins, L., An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. Macmillan, London 1932.
  • Robbins, L., Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility: A Comment, “The Economic Journal”, 48, 635–41, 1932.
  • Robson, A. J., Status, the distribution of wealth, private and social attitudes to risk, “Econometrica”, 60, 837–857, 1992.
  • Runciman, W. G., Relative Deprivation and Social Justice: A Study of Attitudes to Social Inequality in Twentieth-Century England, Berkeley and Los Angeles, University of California Press, 1966.
  • Sala-i-Martin, X., The World Distribution of Income: Falling Poverty and Convergence, Period, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(2), 351-397, 2006.
  • Samuelson P. A., Foundations of Economic Analysis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1947.
  • Sen, A. K., Collective Choice and Social Welfare. Holden-Day, San Francisco, 1970.
  • Sen, A. K., On Economic Inequality. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1973.
  • Sen, A.K. (1976) Real national income, “Review of Economic Studies”, 43, 19–39.
  • Sen, A. K., On weights and measures: informational constraints in social welfare analysis, “Econometrica”, 45, 1539–1572, 1977.
  • Sen, A. K., Foster, J., On Economic Inequality. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1997.
  • Shorrocks, A. F., Ranking Income Distributions, “Economica”, 50, 3–17, 1983.
  • WIID (2007) World income inequality database version 2.0b, UNU-WIDER World Income Inequality Database,
  • Yitzhaki, S. (1979) Relative Deprivation and the Gini Coefficient, “Quarterly Journal of Economics”, 93, 321–32, 1979.
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.