Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2012 | nr 9 (2) | 79--87
Tytuł artykułu

Family in the Reflection of Post Modernist Feminism

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
For ages have people connected a family to a happiness of an individual. As well a contemporary person, facing various economical, social and cultural transformations, according to surveys, puts a family on the top of their values. However, many feminists authors are suspicious of family they understand traditional family and mainly maternity as a source of women's oppression. We will present (without detailed analysis) three dominant feminist trends and their attitudes to family. In this context we will situate the most influential feminist trend in the western academic world: the post-structural feminism. We will present its reflexion of family and gender agenda, inspired by this movement. At the end we will indicate critical note to it. (original abstract)
Opis fizyczny
  • Vysoká škola zdravotníctva a sociálnej práce sv. Alžbety, Detašovane pracovisko Salezianum, Žilina, Slovakia
  • Agacinsky, S.: Politiques des sexes. Paris: Editions de Seuil 1998.
  • Bocchetti, A.: Politica delle donna e politica per le donne. In.: Questioni di teoria femminista, ed. P.Bono, Milano: La Tartaruga 1993, p.184-228.
  • Burggraf, J.: Gender. In.: Pontifical Council for the Family: Lexicon: Ambiguous and Debatable Terms Regarding Family Life and Ethical Questions, Front Royal: Human Life International 2006, p.421-429.
  • Butler, J.: Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge, 1999.
  • Cavarero, A. (ed.): Diotima. Il pensiero della differenza, Milano: La Tartaruga 2003.
  • Derrida, J.: De la grammatologie (= Critique). Paris: Les Editions de Minuit 1969.
  • Eagly, A.H.: Sex Differences and Gender Differences. In.: Encyclopedia of psychology. ed. A.E. Kazdin. 3.vol., Oxford: University Press 2000, p.436-442.
  • Eaves, L. et al.: Comparing the biological and cultural inheritance of personality and social attitudes in the Virginia 30 000 study of twins and their relatives. In.: Twin Research 2 (1999), p.62-80.
  • Fausto-Sterling, A.: The Five Sexes: Why Male and Female are Not Enough. In.: The Sciences 3-4 (1993), p.20-24.
  • Foucault, M.:Histoire de la sexualite. 3 vol., Paris : Gallimard, 1984.
  • Foucault, M.: Les mots et les choses. Une archeologie des sciences humanines. Paris: Gallimard 1966.
  • Friedan, B.: Beyond Gender: The New Politics of Work and Family. Washington: Woodrow Wilson Center Press 1997.
  • Friedan, B.: The Feminine Mystique. Praha: Pragma 2002.
  • Fula, M.: Afirmacia rodiny v adekvatnej antropologii. In.: Filozofia edukacji i etos rodziny, eds. W. Wojcik, M. Rembierz, Bielsko-Biała: Wydawnictwo ATH 2007, p.154-162.
  • Fula, M. Model of cooperation and reciprocity between men and women. In.:. Socioethical aspets of human functioning in the modern world, eds. A. Kuzior, I. Bieńkowska. Banska Bystrica: Aprint, 2011, p.57-66.
  • Irigaray, L.: Ethique de la difference sexuelle. Paris: Le Minuit 1984.
  • Jaggar, A.M., Young, J.M. (eds.): A Companion to Feminist Philosophy, Oxford: Blackwell 1998.
  • Jagger, A.: Political Philosophies of Women Liberation. In.: Femminism and Philosophy, ed. M. Vettreling-Bragging, Totowa: Littlefield 1981, p.5-21.
  • Jagose, A.: Queer Theory, University of Melbourne Press, Melbourne 1996.
  • Kolmar, W.K., Bartowski, F. (eds.): Feminist theory: A reader, Boston: McGraw Hill 2005.
  • Lacroix, X.: In principio la differenza. Omosessualita, matrimonio, adozione. Milano: Vita e Pensiero 2006.
  • Mcelroy, W.: Sexual Correctness: The Gender-Feminist Attack on Women. North Carolina-London: McFarland 2001.
  • Nagl-Docekalova, H., Weisshauptova, B., Fox-Kellerova, E., Codeova, L.: Štyri pohľady do feministickej filozofie. Bratislava: Archa 1994.
  • O'leary, D.: The Gender Agenda: Redefining Equality. Lafayette: Vital Issues Press 1997.
  • Okin, S.: Justice, Gender, and the Family. New York: Basic Books 1989.
  • Palazzini, L.: Identita di genere?.Cinisello Balsamo: San Paolo 2008.
  • Pontifical Council For The Family: Lexicon: Ambiguous and Debatable Terms Regarding Family Life and Ethical Questions. Front Royal: Human Life International 2006.
  • Reif, A., Lesch, K.P.: Toward a Molecular Architecture of Personality. In.: Behavioral Brain Research 139 (2003), p.1-20.
  • Restaino, F., Cavarero, A.: Le filosofie femministe. Torino: Paravia 1999.
  • Scott, J.W.: Gender. A Useful category of historical Analysis. In.: The American historical review 91 (1986), p.1053-1075.
  • Sommers, CH.H.: Who stole feminism? How Women Hawe Betrayed Women. New York: Simon & Shuster 1994.
  • Tong, R.: Feminist Thought. A more Comprehensive Introduction.Boulder: Westview Press 2008.
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.