The Critique of Ideological Legal Reason

• Autorzy: Michał Stambulsk
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In the 19th century there was a commonly held myth that there were three elements of European thought - German, French and Anglo-Saxon. German thought was supposedly strictly philosophical and dealt with pure speculation. French thought was political and its domain was action. Anglo-Saxon thought, on the other hand, was preoccupied with economy and focused on usefulness. This division reflects the socialisation and nationalisation of the Aristotelian categories of theoria, praxis, poiesis. But while the Stagirite saw them as analytical in character, arguing that they could be all present simultaneously in the activity of one subject, the national division highlighted their antagonistic and indivisible character and thus consequently the nations directly linked with these categories were seen as unable to change them. Being philosophical, political or economic was in their nature. They also had a teleological character, indicating the ends which people should aspire to. Thus they determined the manner of modernisation to be pursued, which may be attained, respectively, by further developing culture, granting equal rights in the political realm or fulfilling basic needs by economic means. All the remaining geopolitical areas may select one of the three available ways of modernisation. At the same time, the categories, examined together, constituted Europe in terms of culture and geography. (fragment of text)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Ideology; Democracy; Law

PL

Ideologia; Demokracja; Prawo

• Czasopismo: Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: 5
• Numer: nr 1
• Strony: 48--60

Twórcy

autor

Michał Stambulsk

• University of Wrocław

Bibliografia

• Althusser Louis, Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses, available at <https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/althusser/1970/ideology.htm> accessed 01.09.2014.
• Badiou Alain, Saint Paul: The Foundation of Universalism (1st edn, Stanford University Press 1997).
• Bensaid Daniel, Wywłaszczeni. Marks, własność i komunizm [Expropriated. Marks, property and communism](1st edn, Książka i Prasa, 2010).
• Fukuyama Francis, The End of History and the Last Man (1st edn, The Free Press 1992).
• Król Marcin , Byliśmy głupi [We were stupid], available at <http://wyborcza.pl/magazyn/1,136528,15414610.html> accessed 01.09.2014.
• Marks Susan, The Riddle of All Constitutions: International Law, Democracy, and the Critique of Ideology, (1st edn, Oxford University Press 2003).
• Marx Karl, A Contribution to the Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right. Introduction, available at <https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1843/critique-hpr/intro.htm> accessed 01.09.2014.
• Marx Karl, Debates on the Law on Thefts of Wood, available at <https://marxists.anu.edu.au/archive/marx/works/1842/10/25.htm> accessed 01.09.2014.
• Marx Karl, Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844, available at <https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/manuscripts/wages.ht m> accessed.
• Marx Karl, The German Ideology, available at <https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/germanideology/preface.htm> accessed 01.09.2014.
• Treanor Paul, Neoliberalizm: origins, theory, definition, available at <http://web.inter.nl.net/users/Paul.Treanor/neoliberalism.html> accessed 01.09.2014.
• Žižek Slavoj , The Sublime Object of Ideology (2nd edn, Verso 2008).
• Žižek Slavoj, The Plague of Fantasies (2nd edn, Verso 2008).