The Right to Privacy in the Legal System of the United States

• Autorzy: Monika Bartczak
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The article presents a historical aspect of development of the right to privacy in the American legal system. The considerations bring closer the most significant issues concerning the privacy protection presented among U.S. case-law and doctrine. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Protection of privacy; Common law; Human rights; Protection of personal goods; Right to privacy

PL

Ochrona prywatności; Prawo zwyczajowe; Prawa człowieka; Ochrona dóbr osobistych; Prawo do prywatności

• Czasopismo: Torun International Studies
• Rocznik: 2013
• Numer: nr 1(6)
• Strony: 5--12

Twórcy

autor

Monika Bartczak

• Toruń High School of Banking, Poland

Bibliografia

• Bloustein, E.J., (1964), Privacy as an Aspect of Human Dignity: An Answear to Dean Prosser, University Law Review, 1964, vol. 39.
• Chadwick, P., (2006), "The Value of Privacy", European Human Right Law, issue 5.
• Cooley, T., (1906), Treatise on the Law of Torts: wrongs which arise indepedently of contracts", Third Edition by John Lewis, Callaghan and Company.
• Henkin, L, (1974), Privacy and autonomy, Columbia Law Review, 1974, vol. 74.
• Kalven Jr, H.,(1966) Privacy in Tort law - were Warren and Brandeis wrong?, Law & Contemp Probs., vol. 31.
• Mednis, A., (2006), Prawo do prywatności osób publicznych, Zakamycze.
• Motyka, K., (2010), Prawo do prywatności, Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Podlaskiej w Siedlcach, No 85.
• Prosser, W.L., (1960), Privacy, California Law Review 1960, vol.48, No 3.
• Post, R.C., (1991), "Rereading Warren and Brandeis: Privacy, Property, and Appropriation", Yale Law School Faculty Scholarship Series, Paper 206.
• Rubenfeld, J., (1989), Right to Privacy, Harvard Law Review, vol. 4.
• Sieńczyło-Chlabicz, J., (2006), Naruszenie prawa do prywatności osób publicznych przez prasę. Analiza cywilnoprawna, Zakamycze.
• Warren, S.D. & Brandeis, L.D., (1890), The Right to Privacy, Harvard Law Review, Vol. IV, No. 5.
• Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438, U.S. Supreme Court, March 22, 1972.
• Goodridge v. Department of Public Health, 798 N.E. 2d, Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, November 18, 2003.
• Griswold v. Connecticut 381 U.S. 479, U.S. Supreme Court, June 7, 1965.
• In Re Quinlan, 70 N.J. 10, New Jersey Court of Appeal, March 31,1976.
• McIver v. Krischer, 697 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 1997).
• Pavesich v. New England Life Insurance Co.50 SE 68 Supreme Court of Georgia, March 3, 1905.
• Roberson v. Rochester Folding Ford Company 171 NY 538, 64 N.E.442 New York Court of Appeals, June 27, 1902.
• Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, U.S. Supreme Court, January 22, 1973.
• Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557, U.S. Supreme Court, April 7, 1969.
• Abernethy v.Hutchinson [1825] 3 L.J.Ch. 209.
• Prince Albert v Strange [1849] EWHC Ch. J20.
• Yovatt v. Winyard [1820].

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12775/TIS.2013.001