A Regional Approach to Rural Development? Regional and Rural Programmes in Poland 2007-2015

• Autorzy: Paweł Chmieliński , Marcin Gospodarowicz

Warianty tytułu

Regionalne podejście do rozwoju obszarów wiejskich? Studium regionalnych i wiejskich programów rozwoju w latach 2007-2015 w Polsce

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

We explore the role of structural factors (i.e. place-based characteristics) in shaping EU policy. Our analysis covered the real expenditure of funds for individual priority axes in the programmes of both policies in the 2007-2015 period (according to N+2 rule) and the change in socio-economic features at the local (powiat, NUTS4) level. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to assess the relationship between the level of per capita expenditure on RDP (rural development programmes) and ROP (regional operational programmes) and selected indicators describing the level of economic, social and demographic development of local government units. We show that in 2007-2013 rural and regional policy instruments were complementary, but also strongly related to the characteristics of the region (such as size, population, farmland) and therefore require greater adaptation to development opportunities and limitations. We suggest that there should be a more a place-based approach in future rural policy design and implementation.(original abstract)

W pracy badamy rolę czynników strukturalnych (ściślej tzw. place-based characteristics) w kształtowaniu polityki UE. Analizą objęto rzeczywiste wydatki na poszczególne osie priorytetowe w programach dwóch polityk sektorowych w okresie programowania 2007-2013 oraz zmiany cech społeczno-gospodarczych na poziomie lokalnym (powiatowym, NUTS4). Współczynnik korelacji Pearsona posłużył do oceny zależności między poziomem wydatków na PROW i RPO na 1 mieszkańca oraz wybranymi wskaźnikami opisującymi poziom rozwoju gospodarczego, społecznego i demograficznego jednostek samorządu terytorialnego. Pokazujemy, że instrumenty polityki rozwoju obszarów wiejskich i programów regionalnych w latach 2007-2013 były komplementarne względem siebie, ale także silnie związane z cechami regionu (takimi jak wielkość fizyczna, stan ludności, powierzchnia użytków rolnych), a zatem silnie uzależnione od specyficznych cech danego terytorium. Sugerujemy, że w przyszłej polityce wiejskiej większy nacisk powinno się położyć na regionalne i lokalne (tzw. place-based) uwarunkowania rozwoju.(abstrakt oryginalny)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Regional policy; Regional analysis; Public policy; Rural development; Regional Operational Programme (ROP); Pearson correlation coefficient

PL

Polityka regionalna; Analiza regionalna; Polityka publiczna; Rozwój obszarów wiejskich; Regionalny Program Operacyjny; Współczynnik korelacji Pearsona

• Czasopismo: Wieś i Rolnictwo
• Rocznik: 2018
• Numer: nr 4 (181)
• Strony: 181--198

Twórcy

autor

Paweł Chmieliński

• Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI) in Warsaw, Poland

autor

Marcin Gospodarowicz

• Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute, Poland

Bibliografia

• Barca F. (2009). An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy: A Place-based Approach to Meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations. Independent report prepared at the request of Danuta Hübner, Commissioner for Regional Policy, April 2009.
• Barca F., McCann P., Rodríguez-Pose A. (2012). The case for regional development intervention: Place-based versus place-neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science, 52 (1), 134-152.
• Becker S., Egger P., von Ehrlich M. (2010). Going NUTS: The effect of EU Structural Funds on regional performance. Journal of Public Economics, 94 (9-10), 578-590.
• Brasili C., Fanfani R. (2007). Regional Differences in Agriculture and Rural Areas: The Italian and Chinese Case Studies. Paper Presented at FAO, Rome. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
• Charron N., Dykstra L., Lapuente V. (2013). Regional governance matters: Quality of government within European Union Member States. Regional Studies, 48 (1), 68-90.
• Charron N., Lapuente V., Rothstein B. (2013). Quality of Government and Corruption Form a European Perspective: A Comparative Study of Good Government in EU Regions. Cheltenham-Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Checkel J.T. (2005). International institutions and socialization in Europe: Introduction and framework. International Organization, 59 (4), 801-826.
• Chmieliński P., Cox A., Leonard A., Torrisi G., Tudor M.M. (2018a). Policy Report: Spatial Determinants of Policy Performance and Synergies. PERCEIVE Project Report "Per ception and Evaluation of Regional and Cohesion Policies by Europeans and Identification with the Values of Europe", GA no. 693529. Portsmouth: Portsmouth Business School, University of Portsmouth.
• Chmieliński P., Faccilongo N., Fiore M., La Sala P. (2018b). Design and implementation of the Local Development Strategy: A case study of Polish and Italian Local Action Groups in 2007-2013. Studies in Agricultural Economics, 120, 25-31.
• Chmieliński P., Wieliczko B., Wasilewski A., Wigier M., Gospodarowicz M., Floriańczyk Z. (eds.) (2017). Report on the Policy Recommendations on how to Integrate Cohesion Policy with Urban and Rural Policies. PERCEIVE Project Report "Perception and Evaluation of Regional and Cohesion Policies by Europeans and Identification with the Values of Europe", GA no. 693529. Warsaw: Instytut Ekonomiki Rolnictwa i Gospodarki Żywnościowej-Państwowy Instytut Badawczy.
• Collins A., Leonard A., Cox A., Greco S., Torrisi G. (2017). Report on the Synergies between EU Cohesion Policy and Rural Development Policies: Deliverable 4.2. PERCEIVE Project "Perception and Evaluation of Regional and Cohesion Policies by Europeans and Identification with the Values of Europe", GA no. 693529. Portsmouth: University of Portsmouth.
• Crescenzi R., De Filippis F., Pierangeli F. (2015). In tandem for cohesion? Synergies and conflicts between regional and agricultural policies of the European Union. Regional Studies, 49 (4), 681-704.
• Crescenzi R., Giua M. (2014). The EU cohesion policy in context: Regional growth and the influence of agricultural and rural development policies. LEQS Discussion Paper Series, 85. London: London School of Economics.
• CSO (2018). Local Data Bank. Statistics Poland - Central Statistical Office (CSO), https:// bdl.stat.gov.pl/BDL/start [accessed: 09.05.2018].
• EC (European Commission) (2018). EU budget for the future: Regional Development and Cohesion. Brussels: European Commission.
• Esposti R. (2008). Reforming the CAP: An agenda for regional growth? Paper prepared for the 109th EAAE Seminar "The CAP after the Fischler reform: National implementations, impact assessment and the agenda for future reforms", Viterbo, Italy, 21st-22nd November 2008.
• Hodge I., Midmore P. (2008). Models of rural development and approaches to analysis evaluation and decision-making. Économie Rurale, 307, 23-38.
• Hogan Ph. (2018). Remarks by Commissioner Phil Hogan on Simplification and Subsidiarity. July AGRI Council, Brussels, 17th July, 2018, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/ 2014-2019/hogan/announcements/remarks-commissioner-phil-hogan-simplification- and-subsidiarity-july-agri-council-brussels_en [access: 12.12.2018].
• Lagendijk A., Cornford J. (2000). Regional institutions and knowledge: Tracking new forms of regional development policy. Geoforum, 31 (2), 209-218.
• Le Gallo J., Dall'Erba S., Guillain R. (2011). The local versus global dilemma of the effects of structural funds. Growth and Change, 42 (4), 466-490.
• Monasterolo I. (2012). Analysing the effect of the EU membership on urban and rural areas: The case of Hungary. Rural Areas and Development, 9, 173-194.
• MRiRW (Ministerstwo Rolnictwa i Rozwoju Wsi) (2007). Program Rozwoju Obszarów Wiejskich 2007-2013. Warsaw: Ministerstwo Rolnictwa i Rozwoju Wsi.
• MRR (Ministerstwo Rozwoju Regionalnego) (2007). Narodowe Strategiczne Ramy Odniesienia 2007-2013. Warsaw: Ministerstwo Rozwoju Regionalnego.
• Pelucha M., Kveton V., Jilkova J. (2013). Territorial dimensions of agro-environmental measures and LFA in rural development policy in the Czech Republic. Land Use Policy, 34, 91-103.
• Ray Ch. (1996). The Dialectic of Local Development: The Case of EU Leader 1 Rural Development Programme. Centre for Rural Economy Working Paper Series, 23, 1-37. Newcastle upon Tyne: University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
• Roberts P. (1993). Managing the strategic planning and development of regions: Lessons from a European Perspective. Regional Studies, 27, 759-768.
• Shucksmith M., Thomson K., Roberts D.J. (eds.). (2005). The CAP and the Regions: The Territorial Impact of the Common Agricultural Policy. Oxford: CABI Publishing.
• Sikorska A. (2007). Przeobrażenia w strukturze społeczno-ekonomicznej wsi a proces włączania się Polski do Wspólnej Polityki Rolnej. Warsaw: Instytut Ekonomiki Rolnictwa i Gospodarki Żywnościowej-Państwowy Instytut Badawczy.
• Suddaby R., Greenwood R. (2005). Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50 (1), 35-67.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.7366/wir042018/10