PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2022 | tom 28, nr 2 | 7--22
Tytuł artykułu

Competitiveness of International Merchandise Trade: the Case of Poland

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The aim of the article is to present the possibilities that qualitative classifications of industries and goods introduce to the analysis of structural changes in the economy, as well as to assess changes in the international competitiveness of Polish merchandise trade in the long term. The article presents a review of the literature and the results of authors' own research on the structure of Polish merchandise trade. The study uses Lall's classification of goods which is relatively innovative and rarely used in the existing literature. By using this classification and the analysis of revealed comparative advantages (RCA) we also managed to assess the competitiveness of Polish exports. The research shows that since Poland's accession to the European Union, the international competitiveness of Polish trade in terms of its technological level has changed only slightly. After the growth in the first years of Poland's EU membership, the share of high technology products in the export structure stagnated in the 2010s and was still lower than that of medium or low technology products. Throughout the researched period, the RCA for high-tech products remained on the "foreign" side. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Numer
Strony
7--22
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Warsaw School of Economics, Poland
  • Warsaw School of Economics, Poland
Bibliografia
  • Aiginger, K. (2001). Europe's Position in Quality Competition. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  • Andersen, I., Bams, D. (2022). Environmental management: An industry classification. Journal of Cleaner Production, 344, 130853.
  • Balassa, B. (1965). Trade liberalisation and 'revealed' comparative advantage. The Manchester School, 33, 99-123.
  • Bojnec, Š., Fertő, I. (2009). Agro-food trade competitiveness of Central European and Balkan countries. Food Policy, 34, 417-425.
  • Charrass, A. (2016). New criticism on the competitiveness concept: A critical review of the concept at the macroeconomic level. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 9, 190-193.
  • Czarny, E., Folfas, P. (2020). Polska wymiana towarowa z zagranicą w latach 2004-2017. In J. Wandel, K. Kamińska (eds.), 15 lat wspólnego członkostwa w Unii Europejskiej: osiągnięcia i aktualne wyzwania dla polskiej i niemieckiej polityki gospodarczej (65-77). Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH.
  • Dalziel, M. (2007). A systems-based approach to industry classification. Research Policy, 36, 1559-1574.
  • Davies, S., Lyons, B. (1996). Industrial Organization in the European Union: Structure, Strategy, and the Competitive Mechanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Drobetz, W., Ehlert, S., Schröder, H. (2021). Institutional ownership and firm performance in the global shipping industry. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 146, 102152.
  • Evangelista, R. (2000). Sectoral patterns of technological change in services. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 9, 183-222.
  • Falciola, J., Jansen, M., Rollo, V. (2020). Defining firm competitiveness: A multidimensional framework. World Development, 129, 104857.
  • French, S. (2017). Revealed comparative advantage: What is it good for? Journal of International Economics, 106, 83-103.
  • Han, X., Wen, Y., Kant, S. (2009). The global competitiveness of the Chinese wooden furniture industry. Forest Policy and Economics, 11, 561-569.
  • Hatzichronoglou, T. (1997). Revision of the High-Technology Sector and Product Classification. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/134337307632.
  • Herciu, M. (2013). Measuring international competitiveness of Romania by using Porter's diamond and revealed comparative advantage. Procedia Economics and Finance, 6, 273-279.
  • Jaffe, S., Gordon, P. (1993). Exporting High-value Food Commodities: Success Stories from Developing Countries. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
  • Kaplinsky, R., Paulino, A.S. (2005). Innovation and competitiveness: Trends in unit prices in global trade. Oxford Development Studies, 33, 333-355.
  • Krugman, P. (1994). Competitiveness: A dangerous obsession. Foreign Affairs, 73, 28-44.
  • Lall, S. (2000). The technological structure and performance of developing country manufactured exports, 1985-98. Oxford Development Studies, 28, 337-369.
  • Long, Y. (2021). Export competitiveness of agricultural products and agricultural sustainability in China. Regional Sustainability, 2, 203-210.
  • Marsili, O. (2001). The Anatomy and Evolution of Industries. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Mayer, J., Butkevicius, A., Kadri, A., Pizarro, J. (2003). Dynamic products in world exports. Review of World Economics, 139, 762-795.
  • McGuckin, R.H., Abbott, T.A., Norfolk, L. (1992). Measuring advanced technology products trade: A new approach. Journal of Official Statistics, 8, 223-233.
  • Melitz, M.J. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71, 1695-1725.
  • Misala, J. (2012). Zarys teoretycznych podstaw rozwoju długookresowych przewag konkurencyjnych w handlu międzynarodowym ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem ich istoty, czynników determinujących i ich analizy. Warszawa: Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie.
  • Nazarczuk, J.M., Umiński, S., Gawlikowska-Hueckel, K. (2018). The role of specialisation in the export success of Polish counties in 2004-2015. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 6, 91-109.
  • OECD. (2020). OECD Economic Surveys: Poland 2020. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13, 343-373.
  • Peneder, M. (1999). Intangible Investment and Human Resources: The New WIFO Taxonomy of Manufacturing Industries. Vienna: Austrian Institute of Economic Research (WIFO).
  • Peneder, M. (2003). Industry classifications: Aim, scope and techniques. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 3(1-2), 109-129.
  • Peneder, M. (2010). Technological regimes and the variety of innovation behaviour: Creating integrated taxonomies of firms and sectors. Research Policy, 39, 323-334.
  • Radło, M.-J. (2008). Międzynarodowa konkurencyjność gospodarki. Uwagi na temat definicji, czynników i miar. In W. Bieńkowski, Z. Czajkowski, M. Gomułka, B. Brocka-Palacz, E. Latoszek, J. Misala, M.-J. Radło, M. Weresa, Czynniki i miary międzynarodowej konkurencyjności gospodarek w kontekście globalizacji - wstępne wyniki badań (75-100). Warszawa: Instytut Gospodarki Światowej, Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie.
  • Radło, M.-J. (2011). Evolution of Polish manufacturing in 2000-2010. In M. Weresa (ed.), Poland Competitiveness Report 2011: Focus on Manufacturing (255-292). Warsaw: Warsaw School of Economics.
  • Radło, M.-J., Sagan, M. (2021). Awans krajów Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej w łańcuchach wartości przed pandemią i po jej wygaśnięciu - szanse i wyzwania na przyszłość. In A. Chłoń-Domińczak, R. Sobiecki, M. Strojny, B. Majewski (eds.), Raport SGH i Forum Ekonomicznego 2021 (341-374). Warszawa: Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie.
  • Riker, D. (2012). Electricity efficiency and U.S. manufacturing exports. The Electricity Journal, 25, 84-92.
  • Rinehart, J. (1995). The ideology of competitiveness. Monthly Review, 47, 14-23.
  • Shuai, J., Peng, X., Zhao, Y., Wang, Y., Xu, W., Cheng, J., Lu, Y., Wang, J. (2022). A dynamic evaluation on the international competitiveness of China's rare earth products: An industrial chain and tech-innovation perspective. Resources Policy, 75, 102444.
  • Shuai, J., Zhao, Y., Wang, Y., Cheng, J. (2022). Renewable energy product competitiveness: Evidence from the United States, China and India. Energy, 249, 123614.
  • Startienė, G., Remeikienė, R. (2014). Evaluation of revealed comparative advantage of Lithuanian industry in global markets. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110, 428-438.
  • Szczepaniak, I. (2018). Comparative advantages in Polish export to the European Union - food products vs selected groups of non-food products. Oeconomia Copernicana, 9, 287-308.
  • Uchida, Y., Cook, P. (2005). The effects of competition on technological and trade competitiveness. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 45, 258-283.
  • UN Trade Statistics. (2022). Correspondence Tables - United Nations Statistics Division. Conversion and Correlation Tables. UN Trade Statistics. Retrieved February 4, 2022 from https://unstats.un.org/unsd/trade/classifications/correspondence-tables.asp.
  • UNCTAD Stat. (2022). SITC rev.3 products, by technological categories (Lall (2000)). UNCTAD. Retrieved February 4, 2022 from https://unctadstat.unctad.org/en/Classifications/DimSitcRev3Products_Ldc_Hierarchy.pdf.
  • Zhou, L., Tong, G. (2022). Research on the competitiveness and influencing factors of agricultural products trade between China and the countries along the "Belt and Road". Alexandria Engineering Journal, 61, 8919-8931.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171662394

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.