Monitoring the Implementation and Resolving Disputes under the Brexit Withdrawal Agreement

• Autorzy: Miłosz Gapsa

Warianty tytułu

Kontrolowanie stosowania i rozwiązywanie sporów z brexitowej umowy o wystąpieniu z UE

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of this article is analysis of how the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union governs the mechanisms for monitoring its implementation and resolving disputes. All solutions are based on the international principle of good faith, which obliges the parties of the Agreement to apply it fully. Constant contact between them is ensured by the Joint Committee together with the Special Committees. Any dispute between the parties can only be solved based on the solutions contained in the Agreement, through international arbitration by an arbitration panel. Furthermore, of interest are the provisions governing the specific extension of the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the practice of the parties to date.(original abstract)

Celem niniejszego artykułu jest analiza, w jaki sposób Umowa o wystąpieniu Zjednoczonego Królestwa z Unii Europejskiej reguluje mechanizmy kontroli jej stosowania i rozwiązywania sporów. Wszystkie rozwiązania opierają się o prawnomiędzynarodową zasadę dobrej wiary, która zobowiązuje strony Umowy do jej pełnego stosowania. Stały kontakt między stronami zapewnia Wspólny Komitet wraz ze Specjalnymi Komitetami. Wszelkie spory mogą być rozwiązywane jedynie w oparciu o postanowienia zawarte w Umowie, w oparciu o arbitraż międzynarodowy przed panelem arbitrażowym. Interesujące są również postanowienia regulujące szczególne rozszerzenie jurysdykcji Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej oraz dotychczasowa praktyka stron. W badaniu zastosowano dwie metody analizy prawnej: dogmatyczną (analiza postanowień Umowy) oraz funkcjonalną (próba przewidywania skutków ich realizacji)(abstrakt oryginalny)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Brexit; Solving conflicts; International disputes

PL

Brexit; Rozwiązywanie konfliktów; Spory międzynarodowe

• Czasopismo: Przegląd Europejski
• Rocznik: 2022
• Numer: nr 3
• Strony: 41--53

Twórcy

autor

Miłosz Gapsa

• University of Łódź (Łódź, Poland)

Bibliografia

• 1. AGREEMENT (2020) on the Withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community (consolidated text), OJ L 029, 31.01.2020.
• 2. ANNEX VIII (2020), Rules of Procedure of the Joint Committee and Specialised Committees, attached to the Agreement on the Withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, OJ L 029, 31.01.2020.
• 3. ANNEX IX (IXA) Part A (2020), Rules of Procedure for Dispute Settlement, attached to the Agreement on the Withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, OJ L 029, 31.01.2020.
• 4. ANNEX IX (IXB) Part B (2020), Code of Conduct for Members of Arbitration Panels, attached to the Agreement on the Withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, OJ L 029, 31.01.2020.
• 5. ARMSTRONG Kenneth (2020), Governing With or Without Consent - The United Kingdom Internal Market Act 2020, UK Constitutional Law Association, https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2020/12/18/kenneth-armstrong-governing-with-or-without-consent-the-united-kingdom-internal-market-act-2020/ (18.12.2020).
• 6. AWARD OF THE PCA (2005) of 1 September 2005, Land Reclamation by Singapore in and around the Straits of Johor (Malaysia v. Singapore), Case no. 2004-05.
• 7. BREXIT BULLETIN (2021), EU backtracks on invoking Article 16 of the Northern Ireland Protocol as part of coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine export authorisation scheme, https://www.fiettalaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Brexit-BulletinEU-backtracks-on-invoking-Article-16-of-the-Northern-Ireland-Protocol-as-part-of-coronavirus-COVID-19-vaccine-export-authorisation-scheme.pdf (01.02.2021).
• 8. COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2020/135 of 30 January 2020 on the conclusion of the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community (Text with EEA relevance), OJ L 029, 31.01.2020.
• 9. CLAES Monica, DE VISSER Maartje (2012), Are You Networked Yet? On Dialogues in European Judicial Networks, "Utrecht Law Review", vol. 8, no. 2.
• 10. EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2021a), Commission puts in place transparency and authorisation mechanism for exports of COVID-19 vaccines, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_21_307 (29.01.2021).
• 11. EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2021b), Commission statement on the vaccine export authorisation scheme, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/statement_21_314 (29.01.2021).
• 12. CRAWFORD James (2019), Brownlie's Principles of Public International Law (9th Edition), Oxford, DOI: 10.1093/he/9780198737445.001.0001
• 13. CZAPLIŃSKI Władysław, WYROZUMSKA Anna (2004), Prawo międzynarodowe publiczne. Zagadnienia systemowe, Warszawa.
• 14. DASHWOOD Alan (2020), The Withdrawal Agreement: Common Provisions, Governance and Dispute Settlement, "European Law Review", vol. 45, no. 2.
• 15. DECISION No 1/2020 of the Joint Committee established by the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community of 12 June 2020 amending the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, OJ L 225, 14.07.2020.
• 16. DECISION No 3/2020 of the Joint Committee established by the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community of 17 December 2020 amending the Protocol on Ireland and Northern Ireland to the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, OJ L 443, 30.12.2020.
• 17. DECISION No 7/2020 of the Joint Committee established by the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community of 22 December 2020 establishing a list of 25 persons who are willing and able to serve as members of an arbitration panel under the Agreement, OJ L 443, 30.12.2020.
• 18. GAPSA Miłosz (2022), Renegocjacja albo jednostronne środki ochronne, czyli brytyjskie stanowisko wobec protokołu irlandzkiego, "Europejski Przegląd Sądowy", no. 3/2022.
• 19. HAGUE CONVENTION (1907) for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes of 1907, done in the Hague on 18.10.1907, entered into force on 26.01.1910.
• 20. IRAN-UNITED STATES CLAIMS TRIBUNAL (1983), Tribunal Rules of Procedure, 3 May 1983.
• 21. JUDGMENT OF THE CJEU (1974) of 30 April 1974, R. & V. Haegeman v Belgian State, Case 181-73.
• 22. JUDGMENT OF THE CJEU (1976) of 5 February 1976, Conceria Daniele Bresciani v Amministrazione Italiana delle Finanze, Case 87-75.
• 23. JUDGMENT OF THE CJEU (1981) of 16 June 1981, Maria Salonia v Giorgio Poidomani and Franca Baglieri, née Giglio, Case 126/80.
• 24. JUDGMENT OF THE CJEU (1982) of 6 October 1982, Srl CILFIT and Lanificio di Gavardo SpA v Ministry of Health, Case 283/81.
• 25. JUDGMENT OF THE CJEU (2006) of 30 May 2006, Commission of the European Communities v Ireland, Case C-459/03.
• 26. JUDGMENT OF THE CJEU (2021) of 2 March 2021, A.B. and Others v Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa and Others, Case C-824/18.
• 27. JUDGMENT OF THE CJEU (2021) of 3 June 2021, K and Others v Tesco Stores Ltd, Case C-624/19.
• 28. LAUTERPACHT Hersch (1946), The Grotian Tradition in International Law, "British Yearbook of International Law", vol. 23(1).
• 29. NORTHERN IRELAND SECRETARY admits new bill will 'break international law' (2020), BBC, https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-54073836 (08.09.2020).
• 30. ROSENNE Shabtai (ed.) (2001), The Hague Peace Conferences of 1899 and 1907 and International Arbitration: Reports and Documents, The Hague.
• 31. SAFJAN Marek (2014), Dlaczego dialog pomiędzy sądami bywa trudny? O barierach pytań prejudycjalnych, "Prawo w działaniu", vol. 20.
• 32. TEU, Treaty on European Union, OJ C 326, 26.10.2012.
• 33. TFEU, Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, OJ C 326, 26.10.2012.
• 34. VAN DEN HOUT Tjaco T. (2008), Resolution of International Disputes: The Role of the Permanent Court of Arbitration - Reflections on the Centenary of the 1907 Convention for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes, "Leiden Journal of International Law", vol. 21, issue 3, DOI: 10.1017/S0922156508005220
• 35. VAN NUFFEL Pieter (2021), The Withdrawal Agreement, Part Six: Institutional and Final Provisions, in: M. Kellerbauer, E. Dumitriu-Segnana, T. Liefländer (eds), The UK-EU Withdrawal Agreement: A Commentary, Oxford 2021.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.31338/1641-2478pe.3.22.3