Assessment of Digital Competences of Lublin Province Residents in Relational Terms

• Autorzy: Elena Mieszajkina , Paula Bochen
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: Digital competences in the modern world play a significant role in people's lives. They are vital for building Society 5.0. They are the subject of research by many scholars as well as research organizations and groups. The objective of the article is to present theoretical considerations and results of empirical research on the assessment of digital competences of residents in relational terms. Design/methodology/approach: The review of documents and diagnostic survey methods were used to achieve the objective. The first method consisted in a critical analysis of the literature on the subject and was used to develop methodological assumptions. The second was employed to conduct the empirical study among the residents of the Lublin Province. The results enabled the frequency of the use of digital competences to be linked with the significance of the individual areas of life. Findings: The study confirmed that the residents recognize the importance of digital competences in different areas of life and are ready to develop the competences. The frequency of their use is not high and does not differ significantly in relation to age, education and occupational status. Respondents use the competences the most frequently in the most significant area of life - relationships with their loved ones. The competences are used with the lowest frequency in the least significant areas: religion and civic engagement. Research limitations/implications: The pilot study enabled research assumptions to be verified. The snowball sampling method proved to be effective in the selection of the sample for exploratory purposes. In the prospective basic research, the sample will be selected in such a way as to ensure its representative character. The online survey technique will be replaced by the CATI to reach respondents who do not actively use ICT. The study showed the need for certain changes to be introduced into the research tool. Practical implications: The research proved the validity of applying a relational model when assessing digital competences of residents. In this approach, instead of the areas of people's lives, they can also be analyzed in relation to organizations taking into account the spheres of the organizations' activity. Social implications: The results of the study constitute a valuable source of information concerning Society 5.0 and the significance of digital competences. They confirm that the residents use them with low frequency, which indicates the need for systemic actions to be taken in order to enhance them. Originality/value: The article is based on existing knowledge regarding Society 5.0 and digital competence research models. The originality of the study consists in the use of the relational approach that allows the frequency of their use to be linked with the areas of life significant for respondents.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Digital competences; Society

PL

Umiejętności cyfrowe; Społeczeństwo

• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2022
• Numer: z. 166
• Strony: 545--563

Twórcy

autor

Elena Mieszajkina

• Lublin University of Technology

autor

Paula Bochen

• Lublin University of Technology

Bibliografia

• 1. Analiza doświadczeń oraz identyfikacja dobrych praktyk w obszarze wspierania rozwoju kompetencji cyfrowych w kontekście przygotowania szczegółowych zasad wdrażania programu operacyjnego Polska cyfrowa na lata 2014-2020 oraz koordynacji celu tematycznego. Raport końcowy. Retrieved from https://9lib.org/document/4yr1d17q-doswiadczen-identyfikacja-kompetencji-przygotowania-szczegolowych-operacyjnego-koordynacji-tematycznego.html, 13.09.2020.
• 2. Anrijs, S., Ponnet, K., De Marez, L. (2020). Development and psychometric properties of the Digital Difficulties Scale (DDS): An instrument to measure who is disadvantaged to fulfill basic needs by experiencing difficulties in using a smartphone or computer. PLoS ONE, Vol. 15, No. 5, e0233891, doi: 10.3886/E118021V1.
• 3. Babbie, E. (2021). Badania społeczne w praktyce. Warszawa: PWN.
• 4. Bawden, D. (2008). Origins and Concepts of Digital Literacy. In: C. Lankshear, M. Knobel (Eds.), Digital Literacies. Concepts, Policies and Practices (pp. 17-32). New York: Peter Lang.
• 5. Carretero Gomez, S., Vuorikari, R., Punie, Y. (2017). DigComp 2.1: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC106281, 15.07.2022, doi: 10.2760/38842.
• 6. Council Recommendation of 22 May 2018 on key competences for lifelong learning (Text with EEA relevance). (2018). Official Journal of the European Union C 189/1, 4.6.2018. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv%3AOJ.C_. 2018.189.01.0001.01.ENG, 10.05.2022.
• 7. ELINET (European Literacy Policy Network). Retrieved from http://www.eli-net.eu/about-us/digital-literacy/, 19.07.2022.
• 8. Garbellan, S. (2018). Da Industria 4.0 a Società 5.0: la via del Giappone alla digitalizzazione. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/35809134/Da_Industria_ 4_0_a_Societ%C3%A0_5_0_La_scelta_del_Giappone, 22.07.2022.
• 9. Główny Urząd Statystyczny: Ludność w gminach według stanu w dniu 31.12.2021 r. Retrieved from https://demografia.stat.gov.pl/BazaDemografia/Tables.aspx, 25.07.2022.
• 10. Indeks gospodarki cyfrowej i społeczeństwa cyfrowego (DESI) na 2021 r. Polska. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/80596, 19.07.2022.
• 11. Jasiewicz, J. (2018). Relacyjny model kompetencji cyfrowych i jego implikacje metodologiczne. Studia Medioznawcze, Nr 2, pp. 117-128.
• 12. Jasiewicz, J., Filiciak, M., Mierzecka, A., Śliwowski, K., Klimczuk, A., Kisilowska, M., Tarkowski, A., Zadrożny, J. (2015). Ramowy katalog kompetencji cyfrowych. Retrieved from https://mc.bip.gov.pl/rok-2015/ramowy-katalog-kompetencji-cyfrowych.html, 22.06.2021.
• 13. Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotma, R., Robison A.J., Weigel M. (2006). Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century (Occasional paper on digital media and learning). Chicago, Illinois: The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.macfound.org/media/article_pdfs/ JENKINS_WHITE_PAPER.PDF, 20.08.2020.
• 14. Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Ferrari, A. (2012). Digital competence in practice: an analysis of frameworks. Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2791/82116, 23.07.2022.
• 15. Koppel, I., Langer, S. (2020). Basic digital literacy - Requirements and elements. Revista Práxis Educacional, Vol. 16, No. 42, pp. 326-347.
• 16. Kudyba, S. (2020). COVID-19 and the acceleration of digital transformation and the future of work. Information Systems Management, Vol. 37, Iss. 4, pp. 284-287, doi: 10580530.2020.1818903.
• 17. Kwiatkowski, S.M. (2018). Kompetencje przyszłości. Warszawa: FRSE.
• 18. Lamański, F. Warszawa najbogatszym regionem w Polsce. Ściana wschodnia zamyka stawkę. Retrieved from https://obserwatorgospodarczy.pl/2022/01/19/najbogatsze-i-najbiedniejsze-wojewodztwa-w-polsce-roznice-sa-wyrazne/, 18.07.2022.
• 19. Larsson-Lund, M., Nyman, A. (2020). Occupational challenges in a digital society: A discussion inspiring occupational therapy to cross thresholds and embrace possibilities. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 27, No. 8, pp. 550-535, doi: 10.1080/11038128.2018.1523457.
• 20. Medina-Borja, A. (2017). Smart human-centered service systems of the future. In: Future Services & Societal Systems in Society 5.0. Tokyo, Japan: Center for Research and Development Strategy, Japan Science and Technology Agency, pp. 159-175.
• 21. Meyerhoff Nielsen, M. (2022). Monitoring and Measurement of Digital Inclusion: A Critical Analysis of Key Global Frameworks. Retrieved from https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/items/da2b7a7a-59b1-43b6-8ac4-a2dc5349b8a9, 16.07.2022.
• 22. Mieszajkina, E. (2018). Zarządzanie przedsiębiorcze w małych firmach. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Lubelskiej.
• 23. Milenkova, V., Lendzhova, V. (2021). Digital Citizenship and Digital Literacy in the Conditions of Social Crisis. Computers, Vol. 10, Iss. 4, doi: 10.3390/computers10040040.
• 24. Nair, M., Pradhan, R.P., Arvin, M.B. (2020). Endogenous dynamics between R&D, ICT and economic growth: Empirical evidence from the OECD countries. Technology in Society, Vol. 62, Iss. C, 101315, doi: 1016/j.techsoc.2020.101315Ndubuisi.
• 25. Nair, M.M., Tyagi, A.K., Sreenath, N. (2021). The Future with Industry 4.0 at the Core of Society 5.0: Open Issues, Future Opportunities and Challenges. 2021 International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics (ICCCI), pp. 1-7, doi: 10.1109/ICCCI50826.2021.9402498.
• 26. Nguyen, M.H., Hargittai, E., Marler, W. (2021). Digital inequality in communication during a time of physical distancing: the case of COVID-19. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 120, pp. 1-10, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106717.
• 27. Osuna-Acedo, S., Frau-Meigs, D., Marta-Lazo, C. (2018). Educación Mediática y Formación del Profesorado. Educomunicación más allá de la Alfabetización Digital. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, Vol. 32, Iss. 1, No. 91, pp. 29-42. Retrieved from https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6441410, 25.07.2022.
• 28. Ptaszek, G. (2019). Edukacja medialna 3.0. Krytyczne rozumienie mediów cyfrowych w dobie Big Data i algorytmizacji. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
• 29. Radomska, E. (2019). Rozwój gospodarki cyfrowej i społeczeństwa cyfrowego w aspekcie dynamicznych zmian w otoczeniu zewnętrznym na przykładzie Wielkiej Brytanii. Myśl Ekonomiczna i Polityczna, Nr 1(64), pp. 113-146, doi: 10.26399/meip.1(64).2019.05/ e.radomska.
• 30. Reder, S. (2015). Digital inclusion and digital literacy in the United States: a portrait from PIAAC's Survey of Adult Skills. Retrieved from https://static1.squarespace.com/static/ 51bb74b8e4b0139570ddf020/t/551c3e82e4b0d2fede6481f9/1427914370277/Reder_PIAAC.pdf, 21.07.2020.
• 31. Report on the 5th Science and Technology Basic Plan. Council for Science, Technology and Innovation (2015). Cabinet Office, Government of Japan. Retrieved from https://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/kihonkeikaku/5basicplan_en.pdf, 22.09.2021.
• 32. Sá, M.J., Santos, A.I., Serpa, S., Miguel Ferreira, C. (2021). Digitainability - Digital Competences Post-COVID-19 for a Sustainable Society. Sustainability, 13, 9564, doi: 10.3390/su13179564.
• 33. Seah, K.M. (2020). COVID-19: Exposing digital poverty in a pandemic. International Journal of Surgery, Vol. 79, pp. 127-128, doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.05.057.
• 34. Społeczeństwo informacyjne w Polsce w 2021 r. (2021). Warszawa-Szczecin: Główny Urząd Statystyczny, Urząd Statystyczny w Szczecinie.
• 35. Śledziewska, K., Włoch, R. (2020). Gospodarka cyfrowa. Jak nowe technologie zmieniają świat. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
• 36. Technologia w służbie społeczeństwu. Czy Polacy zostaną społeczeństwem 5.0? (2021). Digital Poland. Raport z serii

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2022.166.35