Inequality Concerns, Social Location, and Perception of Opportunities for Social Advancement: Czechia and Slovakia in a Comparative Perspective

• Autorzy: Miloslav Bahna , Oľga Gyárfášová
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The analytical puzzle of this study is straightforward: how do people's concerns about inequality and social location affect their beliefs about the opportunities for advancement? This study compares Czechia and Slovakia, two states with very low objective levels of inequality but quite different levels of concern about it. In both countries, social welfare expectations derive from the state-run economy in the pre-1989 period. However, in Slovakia the economic changes caused social difficulties and considerable discontent, whereas Czech society demonstrated more free-market friendly attitudes, and the perception of social inequalities was less critical. Based on the ISSP data we analyze what factors are seen as important for "getting ahead" and whether perceptions of inequality and social location reflect meritocratic beliefs or their opposite-corrupt advancement strategies. While there is a stronger feeling in Slovakia that corrupt strategies are necessary in Slovakia, in both societies preferences in regard to strategies for social advancement are better explained by socioeconomic position than by attitudes toward inequalities.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Social inequality; Social-economics inequality; Social services

PL

Nierówności społeczne; Nierówności społeczno-gospodarcze; Opieka socjalna

• Czasopismo: Polish Sociological Review
• Rocznik: 2023
• Numer: nr 2 (222)
• Strony: 169--192

Twórcy

autor

Miloslav Bahna

• Slovak Academy of Sciences

autor

Oľga Gyárfášová

• Comenius University in Bratislava

Bibliografia

• Alesina, A., Stantcheva, S., and Teso, E. 2018. Intergenerational Mobility and Preferences for Redistribution, American Economic Review 108(2): 521-554. DOI: 10.1257/aer.20162015.
• B ahna, M. 2020. Subjekttvne vmmanie struktury slovenskej spolocnosti. http://www.sociologia.sav.sk/cms/up- loaded/3165 attach TS Bahna.pdf
• Basna, K. 2019. Income inequality and level of corruption in post-communist European countries between 1995 and 2014, Communist and Post-Communist Studies 52(2): 93-104. DOI: 10.1016/j.postcom- stud.2019.05.002.
• Becker, B. 2021. Temporal change ininequality perceptions and effects onpolitical attitudes, PoliticalResearch Exchange 3(1): 1-21. DOI: 10.1080/2474736x.2020.1860652.
• Bucca, M. 2016. Merit and blame in unequal societies: Explaining Latin Americans' beliefs about wealth and poverty, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 44: 98-112.
• Buchel, O.,Luijkx, R., and Ach terb erg, P. 2021. Objectiveand Subjective Socioeconomic Status asSources of Status-Legitimacy Effect and Legitimation of Income Inequality, Political Psychology 42(3): 463-481. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12707.
• Butorova, Z. 2019. 30 rokov po Neźnej revolucii. Zisky a straty ocami verejnosti. Bratislava: Institut pre verejne otazky.
• Dzambazovic, R. 2011. Legitimita socialneho statu: nazory verejnosti na prindpy a fungovanie socialnej politiky, in: D. Gerbery (ed.), Potrebujeme socialny stal? Uvahy (nielen) o verejnej politike. Bratislava: FES, pp. 131-161.
• Ganzeboom, H.B.G., De Graaf, P.M., and Treiman, D.J. 1992. A standard International Socio-Economic Index of Occupational Status, Social Science Research 21(1): 1-56.
• Hadler, M. 2005. Why do people accept different income ratios? A multi-level comparison of thirty countries, Acta Sociologica 48(2): 131-154. DOI: 10.1177/0001699305053768.
• Hadler, M. 2017. Social Conflict Perception Between Long-term Inequality and Short-term Turmoil A Multi- level Analysis of Seven Countries Between 1987 and 2009, in: J. Edlund , I. Bechert, and M. Quandt (eds.), Social Inequality in the Eyes ofthe Public: A Collection of Analyses.Based on ISSP Data 19872009 (GESIS-Schriftenreihe, 17). Koln: GESIS-Leibniz-Institut fur Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 35-53.
• Hadler, M., and Haller, M. 2019. Social Stratification and Its Perception in Austria and Its Central- East European Neighbouring Countries from 1960 to 2015: Historical Legacies, Socialist Pasts and Recent Developments, Sociologicky casopis / Czech Sociological Review 55(6): 697-733. DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2020.55.6.490.
• Heiserman, N., Simpson, B., and Will er, R. 2020. Judgments of Economic Fairness Are Based More on Perceived Economic Mobility Than Perceived Inequality, Socius 6. DOI: 10.1177/2378023120959547.
• Heuer, J.O., Lux, T, Mau, S, et al. 2020. Legitimizing inequality the moral repertoires of meritocracy in four countries, Comparative Sociology 19(4-5): 542-584. DOI: 10.1163/15691330-BJA10017.
• ISSP Research Group. 1994. International Social Survey Programme: Social Inequality II-ISSP 1992. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA2310 Data file Version 1.0.0, DOI: 10.4232/1.2310.
• ISSP Research Group. 2002. International Social Survey Programme: Social Inequality III-ISSP 1999. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA3430 Data file Version 1.0.0, DOI: 10.4232/1.3430.
• ISSP Research Group. 2017. International Social Survey Programme: Social Inequality IV-ISSP 2009. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5400 Data file Version 4.0.0, DOI: 10.4232/1.12777.
• ISSP Research Group. 2021. International Social Survey Programme: Social Inequality V-ISSP 2019. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA7600 Data file Version 1.0.0, DOI: 10.4232/1.13599.
• Keller, J., and Tvrdy, L. 2008. Vzdelanostm spolecnost? Chram, vytah apojist'ovna. Prague: Slon.
• Knell, M., and Stix, H. 2020. Perceptions of inequality, European Journal ofPolitical Economy 65(C) DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101927.
• Krauze, T.K., and Slomczynski, K.M. 1985. How Far to Meritocracy? Empirical Tests of a Controversial Thesis, Social Forces 63(3): 623-642.
• Kreid l, M. 2000. Perceptions of poverty and wealth in western and post-communist countries, Social Justice Research 13: 151-176.
• Krivy, V. 1993. Slovakand Czech definitions of the situation. Time: 1992, January Sociologicky casopis 29(1): 73-87.
• Kuhn, A. 2019. The subversive nature of inequality: Subjective inequality perceptions and attitudes to social in- equality, European Journal ofPolitical Economy 59(C): 331-344. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2019.04.004.
• Kunovich, S., and Slomczynski, K.M. 2007 Systems of distribution and a sense of equity: A multilevel analysis of meritocratic attitudes in post-industrial societies, European Sociological Review 23(5): 649663. DOI: 10.1093/esr/jcm026.
• Lavrijsen, J., and Nicaise, I. 2016. Ascription, achievement, and perceived equity of educational regimes: An empirical investigation, Social Sciences 5(4). DOI: 10.3390/socsci5040064.
• Linos, K., and West, M. 2003. Self-interest, Social Beliefs, and Attitudes to Redistribution. Re-addressing the Issue of Cross-national Variation, European Sociological Review 19(4): 393-409. DOI: 10.1093/esr/19.4.393.
• Loveles s, M., and Whitefield, S. 2011. Being unequal and seeing inequality: Explaining thepolitical significance of social inequality in new market democracies, European Journal ofPolitical Research 50(2): 239-266. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01929.x.
• Lubelcova, G., and Zeman, M. 2019. Zivotne sance socialnych akterov v kontexte spolocenskeho vyvoja na Slovensku-subjektwna dimenzia, Sociológia 51 (5): 455-482. DOI: 10.31577/sociologia.2019.51.5.20.
• Matejń, P., and Lim, N. 1995. Who Has Gotten Ahead after the Fall of Communism? The Case of the Czech Republic, Czech Sociological Review 3(2): 117-136.
• Meraviglia, C. 2017. The Social Ladder. Status Mobility Across Time and Countries, in: J. Edlund, I. Bechert, and M. Quandt (eds.), Social Inequality in the Eyes ofthe Public: A Collection of Analyses.Based on ISSP Data 1987-2009 (GESIS-Schriftenreihe, 17). Koln: GESIS-Leibniz-Institut fur Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 11-33.
• Mijs, J.J.B. 2018. Inequality Is a Problem of Inference: How People Solve the Social Puzzle of Unequal Outcomes, Societies 8(3): 64.
• Mijs, J.J.B. 2021. The paradox of Inequality: Income Inequality and Belief in Meritocracy go Hand in Hand, Socio-Economic Review 19(1): 7-35.
• Mijs, J.J.B., and Hoy, C. 2021. How Information about Inequality Impacts Belief in Meritocracy: Evidence from a Randomized Survey Experiment in Australia, Indonesia and Mexico, Social Problems: 1-32. DOI: 10.1093/socpro/spaa059.
• Musil, J. 1992. Czech and Slovak Society. Outline of a Comparative Study, Czech Sociological Review 1(1): 5-21.
• Osberg, L., and Smeeding, T. 2006. "Fair" Inequality? Attitudes toward Pay Differentials: The United States in Comparative Perspective, American Sociological Review 71(3): 450-473.
• Rabusic, L., and Sirovatka, T 1999. Cesky socialny stat a jeho legitimita, Sociologicky casopis 35(3): 397-421.
• Reynolds, J., and Xian, H. 2014. Perceptions of meritocracy in the land of opportunity, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 36: 121-137.
• Roex, K.L.A., Huijts, T., and Sieben, I. 2019. Attitudes towards income inequality: 'Winners' versus 'losers' of the perceived meritocracy, Acta Sociologica (United Kingdom) 62(1): 47-63. DOI: 10.1177/0001699317748340.
• Saxonberg, S., and Sirovatka, T 2018. Central and Eastern Europe, in: B. Greve (ed.), RoutledgeHandbook ofthe Welfare State (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315207049
• Sirovatka, T. 2002. Opinion of Czechs about the Welfare State, Sociologicky casopis 38(3): 327-344.
• Skendaj, E. 2016. Social Status and Minority Corruption in the Western Balkans, Problems of Post- Communism 63(2): 108-120. DOI: 10.1080/10758216.2015.1106323.
• Smith, M.L. 2010. Perceived corruption, distributive justice, and the legitimacy of the system of social stratification in the Czech Republic, Communist and Post-Communist Studies 43(4): 439-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2010.10.005.
• Sopóci, J. 2014. K niektorym otazkam spolocenskej triedy a socialneho statusu v slovenskej spolocnosti, Sociológia 46(2): 146-166.
• Sopóci, J. 2017. Socialna stratifikacia a mobilita v sociologickejperspektrve. Bratislava: Stimul.
• Spravy o socialnej situacii obyvatel'stva Slovenskej republiky. Ministerstvo prace, socialnych vea a rodiny SR. Availableat: https://www.employment.gov.sk/sk/ministerstvo/vyskum-oblasti-prace-socialnych-veci-ins titut-socialnej-politiky/spravy-soc-situacii.html
• Sanderova, J. 1993. Differences Between the Czech and Slovak Perceptions of the Economic Transformation, Czech Sociological Review 1(1): 43-57.
• Tucek, M. 1994. Postup meritokratizace spolecnosti v Ceske a Slovenske republice, Sociológia 26(4): 381-393.
• Večerník, J. 1992. Zmeny v pnjmove nerovnosti v letech 1988-1992, Sociologicky casopis 28(5): 666-684.
• Xian, H., and Reynolds, J. 2017. Bootstraps, Buddies, andBribes: Perceived Meritocracy in the United States and China, Sociological Quarterly 58(4): 622-647. DOI: 10.1080/00380253.2017.1331719

Identyfikatory

DOI

https://doi.org/10.26412/psr222.02