PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2024 | 20 | nr 1 Exploring Entrepreneurial Intentions, Innovation, and Performance in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises | 65--85
Tytuł artykułu

Comparative Analysis of National Innovation Systems: Implications for SMEs' Adoption of Fourth Industrial Revolution Technologies in Developing and Developed Countries

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
This study aims to identify the differences and similarities in the innovation systems of developing vs. developed countries that influence SMEs' adoption of Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) technologies. There is a notable absence of comparative research between National Innovation Systems (NIS) of developing and developed countries. Additionally, the current scholarly conversation lacks a holistic view of NIS. Our study aims to fill these gaps by employing Lundvall's framework to explore both developed and developing countries' systems comprehensively. METHODOLOGY: The data was collected through a Systematic Literature Review, identifying a total of 695 publications from SCOPUS, Web of Science (WoS), and ProQuest. The PRISMA process was adhered to, resulting in 32 papers undergoing quality evaluation using Gough's 'weight of evidence' guidelines. Twenty-nine primary papers were selected, comprising twelve from developed countries, another twelve from developing countries, and the remainder from both categories. Using Qualitative Meta-synthesis (QMS) with ATLAS.ti, a systematic alignment of codes with research inquiries pertaining to NIS ensued, revealing a multifaceted spectrum of findings across these scholarly investigations. FINDINGS: We found that there are similarities and differences between the innovation systems of developed and developing nations. The similarities include the intra-firm interactions taking place between managers and workers, inter-firm relations between the SMEs and Academia and other SMEs, as well as the role of the government in providing funding and regulation (albeit at significantly varying degrees). The most significant differences observed were in the funding mechanisms, the role of the government, and the R&D systems. It was found that governments in developed countries provided SMEs with substantial incentives, tax credits, and subsidies to adopt 4IR technologies, which appears to positively impact the adoption rate. We conclude by developing a conceptual framework for the NIS necessary for the adoption of SMEs' 4IR technologies in developing countries. IMPLICATIONS: This study contributes to the literature on innovation systems by examining the NIS of both developed and developing countries. This analysis allows us to gain deeper insights into how specific aspects of each country (developed or developing) affect (positively or negatively) SMEs' adoption of 4IR technologies. Practically, it informs governments in developing countries on which aspects to focus on in their NIS to increase the rate of the adoption of 4IR technologies by SMEs. ORIGINALITY AND VALUE: A distinctive aspect of this study lies in the creation of a comprehensive conceptual model delineating the essential components of the innovation system pivotal for the successful integration of 4IR technologies within SMEs. This model is designed to serve as a practical tool for governments in developing countries, providing a structured framework to facilitate and enhance the strategic development of their innovation landscapes. (original abstract)
Twórcy
  • Johannesburg Business School, South Africa
Bibliografia
  • Adelowotan, M. (2021). Towards ensuring the sustainability of South African small and medium enterprises in the fourth industrial revolution era. Eurasian Journal of Business and Management, 9(1), 38-46. http://doi.org/10.15604/ejbm.2021.09.01.003
  • Adegbite, W. M., & Govender, C. M. (2021). Emerging roles of small and medium enterprises in the fourth industrial revolution in Africa. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 12(6), 151-166. http://doi.org/10.36941/mjss-2021-0065
  • Alexander, R. (2021). Assessing the ability of the National Innovation System of South Africa to facilitate the Fourth Industrial Revolution (SARChI Industrial Development Working Paper Series WP 2021-8b). University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.
  • Alexopoulos, K., Nikolakis, N., & Xanthakis, E. (2022). Digital transformation of production planning and control in manufacturing SMEs. The mold shop case. Applied Sciences, 12(21), 10788. http://doi.org/10.3390/app122110788
  • Alqam, H., & Saqib, M. (2020). An exploratory study and impact of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) on SMEs in the Middle East. International Journal of Integrated Engineering, 12(7), 121-127. No DOI
  • Antoniuk, L., Gernego, I., Dyba, V., Polishchuk, Y., & Sybirianska, Y. (2017). Barriers and opportunities for hi-tech innovative small and medium enterprises development in the 4th industrial revolution era. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 15(4), 100-113. http://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(4).2017.09
  • Arcidiacono, F., Ancarani, A., Di Mauro, C., & Schupp, F. (2019). Where the rubber meets the road: Industry 4.0 among SMEs in the automotive sector. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 47(4), 86-93. http://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2019.2932965
  • Bayode, A., van der Poll, J. A., & Ramphal, R. R. (2019). 4th industrial revolution: Challenges and opportunities in the South African context. In Conference on Science, Engineering and Waste Management (SETWM-19) (pp. 174-180).
  • Bhalerao, K., Kumar, A., Kumar, A., & Pujari, P. (2022). A study of barriers and benefits of artificial intelligence adoption in small and medium enterprise. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 26, 1-6. No DOI
  • Bin, M., & Hui, G. (2021). A systematic review of factors influencing digital transformation of SMEs. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(11), 1673-1686.
  • Binz, C., & Truffer, B. (2017). Global innovation systems-A conceptual framework for innovation dynamics in transnational contexts. Research Policy, 46(7), 1284-1298. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.012
  • Castleberry, A., & Nolen, A. (2018). Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds? Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10(6), 807-815. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.019
  • Chen, C. (2020). Cross-disciplinary innovations by Taiwanese manufacturing SMEs in the context of Industry 4.0. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 31(6), 1145-1168. http://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-08-2019-0301
  • Chen, C., Lin, Y., Chen, W., Chao, C., & Pandia, H. (2021). Role of government to enhance digital transformation in small service business. Sustainability, 13(3), 1028. http://doi.org/10.3390/su13031028
  • Chuah, M. H., & Thurusamry, R. (2021). Challenges of big data adoption in Malaysia SMEs based on Lessig's modalities: A systematic review. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1968191. http://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1968191
  • Cimini, C., Boffelli, A., Lagorio, A., Kalchschmidt, M., & Pinto, R. (2020). How do Industry 4.0 technologies influence organizational change? An empirical analysis of Italian SMEs. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 32(3), 695-721. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-04-2019-0135
  • Da Roit, B., & Iannuzzi, F. E. (2022). One of many roads to Industry 4.0? Technology, policy, organizational adaptation and worker experience in 'Third Italy' SMEs. New Technology, Work and Employment, 38(2), 252-271. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12241
  • De Lucas Ancillo, A., Gavrila Gavrila, S., Fernández del Castillo Díez, J. R., & Corro Beseler, J. (2022). LATAM and Spanish SME barriers to Industry 4.0. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 35(2), 204-222. http://doi.org/10.1108/ARLA-07-2021-0137
  • Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwal, S., Jones, D., Young, B., & Sutton, A. (2005). Synthesizing qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 10(1), 45-53.
  • Dosso, M., Nwankwo, C. I., & Travaly, Y. (2021). The readiness of innovation systems for the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) in Sub-Saharan Africa. Entrepreneurship, Technology Commercialisation, and Innovation Policy in Africa, 13-32. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58240-1_2
  • Dressler, M., & Paunovic, I. (2021). Sensing technologies, roles, and technology adoption strategies for the digital transformation of grape harvesting in SME wineries. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(2), 123. http://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7020123
  • Dutta, G., Kumar, R., Sindhwani, R., & Singh, R. K. (2020). Digital transformation priorities of India's discrete manufacturing SMEs-a conceptual study in perspective of Industry 4.0. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 30(3), 289-314. http://doi.org/10.1108/CR-03-2019-0031
  • Edquist, C. (2006). Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organisations. New York: Routledge.
  • Endrődi-Kovács, V., & Stukovszky, T. (2022). The adoption of Industry 4.0 and digitalization of Hungarian SMEs. Society and Economy, 44(1), 138-158. https://doi.org/10.1556/204.2021.00024
  • Finlayson, K. W., & Dixon, A. (2008). Qualitative meta-synthesis: A guide for the novice. Nurse Researcher, 15(2), 59-71. http://doi.org/10.7748/nr2008.01.15.2.59.c6330
  • Garbellano, S., & Da Veiga, M. d. R. (2019). Dynamic capabilities in Italian leading SMEs adopting Industry 4.0. Measuring Business Excellence, 23(4), 472-483. http://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-06-2019-0058
  • Ghobakhloo, M., Iranmanesh, M., Vilkas, M., Grybauskas, A., & Amran, A. (2022). Drivers and barriers of Industry 4.0 technology adoption among manufacturing SMEs: A systematic review and transformation roadmap. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, (ahead-of-print). http://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-12-2021-0505
  • Gjaltema, J., Biesbroek, R., & Termeer, K. (2020). From government to governance... to meta-governance: A systematic literature review. Public Management Review, 22(12), 1760-1780. http://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1648697
  • Gough, D. (2007). Weight of evidence: A framework for the appraisal of the quality and relevance of evidence. Research Papers in Education, 22(2), 213-228. http://doi.org/10.1080/02671520701296189
  • Gumbi, L., & Twinomurinzi, H. (2020). SMME readiness for smart manufacturing (4IR) adoption: A systematic review. In M. Hattingh et al. (Eds.), Responsible Design, Implementation and Use of Information and Communication Technology (pp. 41-54). Cham: Springer.
  • Kochetkov, D. M. (2023). Innovation: A state-of-the-art review and typology. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 7, 263-272. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2023.05.004
  • Kraemer-Mbula, E., & Wamae, W. (2010). Adapting the Innovation Systems framework to Sub-Saharan Africa. In E. Kraemer-Mbula & W. Wamae (Eds.), Innovation and the Development Agenda (pp. 65-90). OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264088924-en
  • Hwang, W., & Kim, H. (2021). Does the adoption of emerging technologies improve technical efficiency? Evidence from Korean manufacturing SMEs. Small Business Economics, 59, 627-643. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00554-w
  • Isabelle, D., Mosupye-Semenya, L., & Dhliwayo, S. (2023). Sustainable adoption of Fourth Industrial Revolution technologies by SMEs: The case of the South African ecosystem. Proceedings 6th Biennial Conference - Africa Academy of Management.
  • Joshi, S., Sharma, M., Bartwal, S., Joshi, T., & Prasad, M. (2022). Critical challenges of integrating OPEX strategies with I4.0 technologies in manufacturing SMEs: A few pieces of evidence from developing economies. The TQM Journal, 36(1), 108-138. http://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-08-2022-0245
  • Lee, K., & Lee, J. (2020). National innovation systems, economic complexity, and economic growth: Country panel analysis using the US patent data. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 30, 897-928. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84931-3_6
  • Linnenluecke, M. K., Marrone, M., & Singh, A. K. (2020). Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses. Australian Journal of Management, 45(2), 175-194. http://doi.org/10.1177/0312896219877678
  • Liu, Y., Lu, Q., Zhu, L., Paik, H., & Staples, M. (2021). A systematic literature review on Blockchain governance. Journal of Systems and Software, 111576. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3981282
  • Lorenz, E., & Kraemer-Mbula, E. (2021). The impact of adopting 4IR-related technologies on employment and skills: The cases of the automotive and mining equipment manufacturers in South Africa. In Z. Mazibuko-Makena & E. Kraemer-Mbula (Eds.), Leap 4.0: African Perspective on the 4IR (pp. 183-218). Mistra.
  • Lundvall, B. (2016). National Innovation Systems. New York: Anthem Press.
  • Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, 31(2), 247-264. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00139-1
  • Marcysiak, A., & Pleskacz, Ż. (2021). Determinants of digitization in SMEs. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 9(1), 300. http://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2021.9.1(18)
  • Marwala, T. (2021). Leading in the 21st Century: The Call for a New Type of African Leader. Jonathan Ball Publishers.
  • Masood, T., & Sonntag, P. (2020). Industry 4.0: Adoption challenges and benefits for SMEs. Computers in Industry, 121, 103261. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2020.103261
  • McKeown, S., & Mir, Z. M. (2021). Considerations for conducting systematic reviews: Evaluating the performance of different methods for de-duplicating references. Systematic Reviews, 10(1), 1-8. http://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01583-y
  • Mokonyama, M., Malatji, M., & Mlitwa, N. (2022, October). Addressing operational challenges of small and medium enterprises of the logistics industry-Potential for autonomous vehicles. In 2022 International Conference on Engineering and Emerging Technologies (ICEET) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. http://doi.org/10.1109/ICEET56468.2022.10007250
  • Munongo, S., & Pooe, D. (2022). Small and Medium Eenterprises' adoption of 4IR technologies for supply chain resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management, 16, 11. http://doi.org/10.4102/jtscm.v16i0.747
  • Mittal, S., Khan, M. A., Purohit, J. K., Menon, K., Romero, D., & Wuest, T. (2020). A smart manufacturing adoption framework for SMEs. International Journal of Production Research, 58(5), 1555-1573. http://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1661540
  • Ndou, A. T., Madonsela, N. S., & Twala, B. (2020). The era of digital technology: Analysis of factors contributing to economic growth and sustainability. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2nd African International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management.
  • Nelson, R. R. (1993). National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., & Brennan, S. E. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10(1), 1-11. http://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  • Rojas-Berrio, S., Rincon-Novoa, J., Sánchez-Monrroy, M., Ascúa, R., & Montoya-Restrepo, L. A. (2022). Factors influencing 4.0 technology adoption in manufacturing SMEs in an emerging country. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 32(3), 67-83. http://doi.org/10.53703/001c.34608
  • Saldaña, J. (2013). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. London: Sage.
  • Setyaningsih, S., Kelle, P., & Maretan, A. S. (2020). Driver and barrier factors of Industry 4.0 implementation for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises: An overview. Economic and Social Development: Book of Proceedings. Retrieved from https://www.bib.irb.hr/croris-redir/
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171686674

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.