PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2019 | 104 | nr 160 | 149--169
Tytuł artykułu

Behavioral Aspects of Auditing and the Auditor's Decision-Making as a Key Cognitive Process in the Case of Fraud

Warianty tytułu
Aspekty behawioralne audytu i podejmowania decyzji przez audytora jako kluczowy proces poznawczy w przypadku nadużyć finansowych
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
Oszustwo dla organizacji jest rodzajem choroby. Jedną z kluczowych osób, której zadaniem jest wykrycie oszustwa jest audytor. Wykryte nadużycie jest najbardziej stresującym przypadkiem i dlatego określono pisemnie standardy postępowania. Zgodnie z nimi, audytor powinien mieć wystarczająco dużo "zawodowego sceptycyzmu", który wpływa na jego sposób myślenia i działania. Celem artykułu jest ukazanie behawioralnego aspektu audytu i poznanie, w jaki sposób cechy poznawcze procesu decyzyjnego mogą pomóc audytorom w wykrywaniu i badaniu oszustwa. Badania te są oparte na analizie i interpretacji literatury przedmiotu. Wnioskiem płynącym z badań jest to, że proces poznawczy odgrywa kluczową rolę w audycie, ponieważ procesy osądu i podejmowania decyzji są podstawowymi procesami poznawczymi. W przypadku wykrycia oszustwa, zgodnie z teorią kognitywną, audytor przywołuje ostatnie doświadczenia w zakresie wykrywania oszustw, formułuje osąd, a następnie podejmuje decyzję opartą na doświadczeniu. Dla znalezienia najlepszego rozwiązania w danej sprawie istotna może być wymiana doświadczeń i opinii między audytorami. (abstrakt oryginalny)
EN
Fraud is like a disease for organizations. One of the key people meant to detect fraud is the auditor. A detected fraud is the most stressful case, and therefore, there are written standards of actions. According to professional standards, an auditor should have enough "professional skepticism", which should help to organize his way of thinking and his actions. However, even such organized people are only people; human nature influences their behavior. The aim of the paper is to show the behavioral aspect of auditing and to find out how cognitive characteristics of decision-making could help auditors detect and investigate fraud. This theoretical research is a theory-driven interpretative literature review, based on a synthesis of the academic literature. The key finding of the research is that the cognitive process plays a key role in auditing because processes of judgment and decision-making are basic cognitive processes. When fraud is detected, according to cognitive theory, the auditor recalls the last experience of fraud detection, forms a judgment, and then makes a decision based on this experience. Trying to provide the best solution for the case, it could be relevant to share the experience and opinions among auditors. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Tom
104
Numer
Strony
149--169
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Tallinn University of Technology, Estonia
autor
  • Tallinn University of Technology, Estonia
Bibliografia
  • Bernardi R.A. (1994), Fraud Detection: The Effect of Client Integrity and Competence and Auditor Cognitive Style, "Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory", 13, pp. 68-85.
  • Cosserat G.W. (2000), Modern Auditing. Wiley, Chichester.
  • Fuller L.R., Kaplan S.E. (2004), A Note about the Effect of Cognitive Style on Task Performance. "Behavioral Research in Accounting", 16, pp. 131-143.
  • Harding N., Azim M.I., Jidin R., Muir J.P. (2016), A Consideration of Literature on Trust and Distrust as they Relate to Auditor Professional Scepticism, "Australian Accounting Review", 26 (3), pp. 243-254; http://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12126.
  • Hurtt R.K. (2010), Development of a scale to measure professional skepticism, "Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory", 29 (1), 149-171; http://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2010.29.1.149.
  • Kast F.E., Rozenzweig J.E. (1972), General Systems Theory: Applications for Organization and Management, "The Academy of Management Journal", 15 (4), pp. 447-465.
  • Knapp M.C. (1985). Audit Conflict: An Empirical Study of the Perceived Ability of Auditors to Resist, "The Accounting Review", 60 (2), pp. 202-211.
  • Libby R., Lipe M.G. (1992), Incentives, Effort, and the Cognitive Processes Involved in Accounting-Related Judgments, "Journal of Accounting Research", 30 (2), pp. 249-273.
  • Lowe, D. J. (1994), Perception differences between auditors and judged, "Journal of Applied Business Research", 10 (3), pp. 39-44.
  • Nowak M. (2016), Behavioral Accounting Research - Accounting Research in the Behavioral Paradigm? True or False?, "Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Bankowej w Poznaniu", 66 (1), pp. 119-127.
  • Paré G., Trudel M.C., Jaana M., Kitsiou S. (2015), Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews, "Information & Management", 52 (2), pp. 183-199.
  • Peursem K. Van (2005). The Auditor's Dilemma: An Economic Perspective On An Old Problem, "Working Paper Series", 86, pp. 1-21.
  • Rossouw G.J. (2000), Defining and understanding fraud: a South African case study, "Business Ethics Quarterly", 10 (4), pp. 885-895.
  • Schweikart J. A. (1992), Cognitive-Contingency Theory and the Study of Ethics in Accounting, "Journal of Business Ethics", 11, pp. 471-478.
  • Vassiljev M., Alver L. (2016), Conception and Periodisation of Fraud Models: Theoretical Review. In 5th International Conference on Accounting, Auditing, and Taxation (ICAAT 2016), Atlantis Press.
  • Vlad M., Tulvinchi M., Chirita I. (2011), The consequences of fraudulent financial reporting, "The Annals of the Ştefan Cel Mare University of Suceava. Fascicle of The Faculty of Economics and Public Administration", 11 (1), pp. 264-268.
  • Wang Y., Ruhe G. (2007) The Cognitive Process of Decision Making, "International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence", 1 (2), pp. 73-85.
  • Warning-Rasmussen B., Windsor C. A. (2003), Danish Evidence of Auditors' Level of Moral Reasoning and Predisposition to Provide Fair Judgements, "Journal of Business Ethics", 47, pp. 77-87.
  • Awasthy V., Mishra J. (2018), Behavioural accounting: Looking at behavioural aspect to financial accounting, "International Journal of Advanced Research and Development", 3 (1), pp. 690-692. Retrieved from www.advancedjournal.com (accessed 01.02.2019).
  • Bakre O.M. (2007), The unethical practices of accountants and auditors and the compromising stance of professional bodies in the corporate world: Evidence from corporate Nigeria. "Accounting Forum", 31, pp. 277-303; http://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2007.06.001 (accessed 01.02.2019).
  • Chen J.Q., Lee S.M. (2003), An exploratory cognitive DSS for strategic decision making, "Decision Support Systems", 36, pp. 147-160; http://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(02)00139-2 (accessed 02.02.2019).
  • Chiang C. (2016), Conceptualising the linkage between professional scepticism and auditor independence, "Pacific Accounting Review", 28 (2), pp. 180-200; http://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-08-2015-0034 (accessed 05.02.1019).
  • Endrawes M. (2010), Professional Scepticism of Auditors: a Cross-Cultural Experiment, University of Western Sydney; https://researchdirect.westernsydney.edu.au/islandora/object/uws 8931/datastream/PDF/view (accessed 31.01.2019).
  • Espinosa-Pike M., Barrainkua I. (2016), An exploratory study of the pressures and ethical dilemmas in the audit conflict, "Revista de Contabilidad", 19 (1), pp. 10-20; http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsar.2014.10.001 (accessed 15.01.2019).
  • Gist W. E., Scott W.D., Shastri T. (2013), External Auditor's Ethical Dilemma: Perceived Threat To Auditor's Responsibility Posed by the Auditor's Allegiance to Corporate Management, "Journal of Accounting, Ethics & Public Policy", 14 (3), pp. 665-691; http://doi.org/10.4135/9781446254523 (accessed 15.01.2019).
  • Hogarth R.M. (1991), A Perspective on Cognitive Research in Accounting, "The Accounting Review", 66 (2), pp. 277-290; https://about.jstor.org/terms (accessed 15.01.2019).
  • IFAC (2012) IAS 240 The auditor's responsibilities relating tfraudud in an audit of financial statements; http://www.ifac.org/system/files/downloads/a012-2010-iaasb-handbook-isa-240.pdf (accessed 20.02.2019).
  • Kleinman G., Medinets A., Palmon D. (2007), A Theoretical Model of Cognitive Factors that Affect Auditors' Performance and Perceived Independence. Available at SSRN 989044 (accessed 20.01.2019).
  • Nelson M.W. (2009), A model and literature review of professional skepticism in auditing, "Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory", 28 (2), pp. 1-34; http://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2009.28.2.1 (accessed 10.01.2019).
  • Peecher M.E. (1996), The Influence of Auditors' Justification Processes on Their Decisions: A Cognitive Model and Experimental Evidence, "Journal of Accounting Research", 34 (1), pp. 125-140; http://doi.org/10.2307/2491335 (accessed 16.01.2019).
  • Quadackers L., Groot T., Wright A. (2014), Auditors' professional skepticism: Neutrality versus presumptive doubt, "Contemporary accounting research", 31 (3), pp. 639-657; DOI:10.1111/1911-3846.12052 (accessed 12.05.2019).
  • Schmitt D.B., Hageman A.M., Radtke R.R. (2014), A Research Note on the Relationship Between Professional Skepticism and Client Advocacy, "Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research" (pp. 161-182). Emerald Group Publishing Limited; https://doi.org/10.1108/S1475-148820140000017005 (accessed 12.05.2019).
  • Se Tin S.T., Agustina L., Meyliana M. (2017), A new classification of topics in behavioral accounting: current research direction from BRIA journal in the past 10 years, "Journal of the Academy of Business and Retail Management", 11 (3), pp. 47-58; www.jbrmr.com (accessed 01.02.2019).
  • Sin S., Jones A., Wang Z. (2015), Critical thinking in professional accounting practice: Conceptions of employers and practitioners, [in:] The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education pp. 431-456; http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-37805-7_26 (accessed 14.01.2019).
  • Trompeter G.M., Carpenter T.D., Desai N., Jones K.L., Riley R.A.J. (2013), A Synthesis of Fraud-Related Research, "A Journal of Practice & Theory", 32 (November 2012), pp. 287-321; http://doi.org/ 10.2308/ajpt-50360 (accessed 15.01.2019).
  • Wood R., Bandura A. (1989), Social Cognitive Theory of Organizational Management, "Academy of Management Review", 14 (3), pp. 361-384; http://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1989.4279067 (accessed 15.01.2019).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171575866

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.