A paradigm shift in sustainability: from lines to circles

• Autorzy: Piergiuseppe Morone , Gülşah Yilan
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The concept of sustainability is attracting great attention as societies become increasingly aware of the environmental consequences of their actions. One of the most critical challenges that humankind is facing is the scarcity of resources, which are expected to reach their limits in the foreseeable future. Associated with this, there is increasing waste generated as a consequence of rapid growth in the world population (particularly inurban areas) and aparallel rise in global income. To cope with these problems, a linear strategy has been applied to increase efficiency by reducing the use of materials and energy in order to lessen environmental impacts. However, this cradle to grave approach has proven inadequate, due to a lack of attention to several economic and social aspects. A paradigm shift is thus required to re-think and innovate processes (as early as inthe design phase) in such a way that materials and energy are used more effectively within aclosed-loop system. This strategy, known as the cradle to cradle approach, relies on the assumption that everything is aresource for something else since no waste is ever generated in nature. In line with the cradle to cradle approach, the bio-inspired circular economy concept aims at eco-effectiveness, rather than eco-efficiency. While the circular economy has neither a confirmed definition nor a standardized methodology, it nonetheless carries significant importance, since it "is restorative and regenerative by design and aims to keep products, components, and materials at their highest utility and value at all times, distinguishing between technical and biological cycles," in accordance with the goals of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Despite some controversial opinions that "circles are not spirals, and for growth to occur, spirals with ever-increasing radii are required," the circular economy concept is taking a central role in the sustainable development debate and, for this reason, deserves attention. The aim of this paper is to shed light on this debate, pointing out the main features of the emerging circular paradigm along with sustainability transition theories and circularity evaluation tools.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Circular economy; Sustainable development; Ecology

PL

Gospodarka zamkniętego obiegu; Rozwój zrównoważony; Ekologia

• Czasopismo: Acta Innovations
• Rocznik: 2020
• Numer: nr 36
• Strony: 5--16

Twórcy

autor

Piergiuseppe Morone

• Unitelma Sapienza University of Rome

autor

Gülşah Yilan

• Marmara University, Department of Chemical Engineering

Bibliografia

• European Commission (2010) Critical Raw Materials for the EU. Report of the Ad-hoc Working Group on Defining Critical Raw Materials. European Commission, Enterprise and Industry. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/raw-materials/specific-interest/critical_en [accessed May 31, 2020].
• McElroy C.R., Constantinou A., Jones L.C., Summerton L., Clark J.H., Towards a holistic approach to metrics for the 21st century pharmaceutical industry. "Green Chemistry" 17 (2015), 3111-3121.
• Massari S., Ruberti M., Rare earth elements as critical raw materials: Focus on international markets and future strategies. "Resources Policy" 38 (2013), 36-43.
• Mcdonough W., Braungart M., Design for the triple top line: New tools for sustainable commerce. "Corporate Environmental Strategy" 9 (2002), 251-258.
• McDonough W., Braungart M., Anastas P.T., Zimmerman J.B., Applying the principles of green engineering to cradle-to-cradle design. "Environmental Science and Technology" 37 (2003), 434A-441A.
• Braungart M., McDonough W., Bollinger A., Cradle-to-cradle design: Creating healthy emissions - A strategy for eco-effective product and system design. "Journal of Cleaner Production" 15 (2007), 1337-1348.
• United Nations General Assembly (2015) Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, A/RES/70/1. Available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/57b6e3e44.html [accessed March 11, 2020].
• Kalmykova Y., Sadagopan M., Rosado L., Circular economy - From review of theories and practices to development of implementation tools. "Resources Conservation and Recycling" 135 (2018), 190-201.
• Ávila-Gutiérrez M.J., Martín-Gómez A., Aguayo-González F., Córdoba-Roldán A., Standardization framework for sustainability from circular economy 4.0. "Sustainability" 11 (2019), 6490.
• Korhonen J., Honkasalo A., Seppälä J., Circular economy: The concept and its limitations. "Ecological Economics" 143 (2018), 37-46.
• Pesce M., Tamai I., Guo D., Critto A., Brombal D., Wang X., Cheng H., Marcomini A., Circular economy in China: Translating principles into practice. "Sustainability" 12 (2020), 832.
• D'Adamo I., Falcone P.M., Gastaldi M., Morone P., A social analysis of the olive oil sector: The role of family business. "Resources" 8 (2019), 151.
• Ladu L., Imbert E., Quitzow R., Morone P., The role of the policy mix in the transition toward a circular forest bioeconomy. "Forest Policy and Economics" 110 (2020), 101937.
• Morone P., Sica E., Makarchuk O., From waste to value: Assessing the pressures toward a sustainabilitytransition of the Ukrainian waste management system. In: Innovation Strategies in Environmental Science, Elsevier, 2020.
• Morone P., The times they are a-changing: Making the transition toward a sustainable economy. Biofuels, "Bioproducts and Biorefining" 10 (2016), 369-377.
• Schot J., Geels F.W., Niches in evolutionary theories of technical change: A critical survey of the literature. "Journal of Evolutionary Economics" 17 (2007), 605-622.
• Svensson O., Nikoleris A., Structure reconsidered: Towards new foundations of explanatory transitions theory. "Research Policy" 47 (2018), 462-473.
• Markard J., Truffer B., Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework. "Research Policy" 37 (2008), 596-615.
• The British Standards Institution (2017) BS 8001:2017 Framework for implementing the principles of the circular economy in organizations.
• CEN-CENELEC Joint Technical Committee 10 on Energy-related products - Material Efficiency Aspects for Ecodesign (CEN-CLC/JTC 10) (2019) EN 45558:2019 General method to declare the use of critical raw materials in energy-related products.
• CEN-CENELEC Joint Technical Committee 10 on Energy-related products - Material Efficiency Aspects for Ecodesign (CEN-CLC/JTC 10) (2019) EN 45559:2019 Methods for providing information relating to material efficiency aspects of energy-related products.
• European Commission (2020) Circular Economy Action Plan. A European Green Deal. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en [accessed March 19, 2020].
• Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2015) Circularity Indicators. An Approach to Measuring Circularity. Available at:https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/insight/Circularity-Indicators_Project-Overview_May2015.pdf [accessed March 11, 2020].
• Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2019) Circulytics - measuring circularity. Available at: https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/resources/apply/circulytics-measuring-circularity [accessed March 11, 2020].
• Enel Sp.A. (n.d.) CirculAbility Model. Available at: https://corporate.enel.it/en/circular-economysustainable- future/performance-indicators [accessed March 11, 2020].
• Skene K.R., Circles, spirals, pyramids and cubes: Why the circular economy cannot work. "Sustainability Science" 13 (2018), 479-492.
• Kalmykova Y., Sadagopan M., Rosado L., Circular economy - From review of theories and practices to development of implementation tools. "Resources, Conservation and Recycling" 135 (2018), 190-201.
• D'Amato D., Droste N., Allen B., Kettunen M., Lähtinen K., Korhonen J., Leskinen P., Matthies B.D., Toppinen A., Green, circular, bio economy: A comparative analysis of sustainability avenues. "Journal of Cleaner Production" 168 (2017), 716-734.
• Geisendorf S., Pietrulla F., The circular economy and circular economic concepts-A literature analysis and redefinition. "Thunderbird International Business Review" 60 (2018), 771-782.
• Prieto-Sandoval V., Jaca C., Ormazabal M., Towards a consensus on the circular economy. "Journal of Cleaner Production" 179 (2018), 605-615.
• Leal Filho W., Tripathi S.K., Andrade Guerra J.B.S.O.D., Giné-Garriga R., Orlovic Lovren V., Willats J., Using the sustainable development goals towards a better understanding of sustainability challenges. "International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology" 26 (2019), 179-190.
• Bjørn A., Diamond M., Owsianiak M., Verzat B., Hauschild M.Z., Strengthening the link between life cycle assessment and indicators for absolute sustainability to support development within planetary boundaries. "Environmental Science and Technology" 49 (2015), 6370-6371.
• Rotmans J., Loorbach D., Complexity and transition management. "Journal of Industrial Ecology" 13 (2009), 184-196.
• Frantzeskaki N., Loorbach D., Meadowcroft J., Governing societal transitions to sustainability. "International Journal of Sustainable Development" 15 (2011), 19-36.
• Schot J., Steinmueller W.E., Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. "Research Policy" 47 (2018), 1554-1567.
• Geels F.W., Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. "Research Policy" 31 (2002), 1257-1274.
• Schlaile M.P., Urmetzer S., Transitions to Sustainable Development. In Leal Filho W. (Ed.). Decent Work and Economic Growth, Springer International Publishing, 2019.
• Pyka A., Dedicated innovation systems to support the transformation towards sustainability: Creating income opportunities and employment in the knowledge-based digital bioeconomy. "Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity" 3 (2017), 27.
• Cajaiba-Santana G., Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework. "Technological Forecasting and Social Change" 82 (2014), 42-51.
• Patterson J., Schulz K., Vervoort J., van der Hel S., Widerberg O., Adler C., Hurlbert M., Anderton K., Sethi M., Barau A., Exploring the governance and politics of transformations towards sustainability. "Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions", 24 (2017), 1-16.
• Sorrell S., Explaining sociotechnical transitions: A critical realist perspective. "Research Policy" 47 (2018), 1267-1282.
• Wesseling J.H., Lechtenböhmer S., Åhman M., Nilsson L.J., Worrell E., Coenen L., The transition of energy intensive processing industries towards deep decarbonization: Characteristics and implications for future research. "Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews" 79 (2017), 1303-1313.
• Kivimaa P., Kangas H-L., Lazarevic D., Client-oriented evaluation of 'creative destruction' in policy mixes: Finnish policies on building energy efficiency transition. "Energy Research and Social Science" 33 (2017), 115-127.
• Rogge K.S., Schleich J., Do policy mix characteristics matter for low-carbon innovation? A survey-based exploration of renewable power generation technologies in Germany. "Research Policy" 47 (2018), 1639-1654.
• Schot J., Confronting the Second Deep Transition through the Historical Imagination. "Technology and Culture" 57 (2016), 445-456.
• Walrave B., Raven R., Modelling the dynamics of technological innovation systems. "Research Policy" 45 (2016), 1833-1844.
• Rip A., Kemp R., Technological Change. In: Rayner S, Malone EL. (Eds) Human Choice and Climate Change, Battelle, Columbus, OH, 1998.
• Geels F.W., Schot J., Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. "Research Policy" 36 (2007), 399-417.
• Grin J., Rotmans J, Schot J. Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change, Routledge, New York, 2010.
• Hosseinifarhangi M., Turvani E.M., van der Valk A., Carsjens J.G. Technology-driven transition in urban food production practices: A case study of Shanghai. "Sustainability" 11 (2019), 6070.
• Kompella L., Barriers to radical ınnovations as stable designs: Insights from an IT case study. "International Journal of Innovation Management" 23 (2019), 1950047.
• Lin X., Sovacool B.K., Inter-niche competition on ice? Socio-technical drivers, benefits and barriers of the electric vehicle transition in Iceland. "Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions" 35 (2020), 1-20.
• Geels F.W., Socio-Technical Transitions to Sustainability, in: Oxford Research Encyclopedias Environmental Science, Oxford University Press, 2018.
• Geels F.W., Socio-technical transitions to sustainability: A review of criticisms and elaborations of the Multi-Level Perspective. Current Opinion in "Environmental Sustainability" 20 (2019), 1-15.
• International Organization for Standardization (2006) ISO 14044:2006 Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Requirements and guidelines.
• Corona B., Shen L., Reike D., Rosales Carreón J., Worrell E., Towards sustainable development through the circular economy-A review and critical assessment on current circularity metrics. "Resources Conservation and Recycling" 151 (2019), 104498.
• Lokesh K., Matharu A.S., Kookos I.K., Ladakis D., Koutinas A., Morone P., Clark J., Hybridised sustainability metrics for use in life cycle assessment of bio-based products: Resource efficiency and circularity. "Green Chemistry" 22 (2020), 803-813.
• Reap J., Roman F., Duncan S., Bras B., A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment. Part 1: Goal and scope and inventory analysis. "International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment" 13 (2008), 290-300.
• Reap J., Roman F., Duncan S., Bras B., A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment. Part 2: Impact assessment and interpretation. "International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment" 13 (2008), 374-388.
• Curran M.A., Life Cycle Assessment: A review of the methodology and its application to sustainability. "Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering" 2 (2013), 273-277.
• Dreyer L.C., Hauschild M.Z., Schierbeck J., A framework for social life cycle impact assessment. "International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment" 11 (2006), 88-97.
• Guinée J.B., Heijungs R., Huppes G., Zamagni A., Masoni P., Buonamici R., Ekvall T., Rydberg T., Life cycle assessment: Past, present, and future. "Environmental Science and Technology" 45 (2011), 90-96.
• Heijungs R., Settanni E., Guinée J., Toward a computational structure for life cycle sustainability analysis: Unifying LCA and LCC. "International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment" 18 (2013), 1722-1733.
• Heijungs R., Huppes G., Guinée J.B., Life cycle assessment and sustainability analysis of products, materials and technologies. Toward a scientific framework for sustainability life cycle analysis. "Polymer Degradation and Stability" 95 (2010), 422-428.
• Campos-Guzmán V., García-Cáscales M.S., Espinosa N., Urbina A., Life Cycle Analysis with Multi-Criteria Decision Making: A review of approaches for the sustainability evaluation of renewable energy technologies. "Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews" 104 (2019), 343-366.
• Hoogmartens R., Van Passel S., Van Acker K., Dubois M., Bridging the gap between LCA, LCC and CBA as sustainability assessment tools. "Environmental Impact Assessment Review" 48 (2014), 27-33.
• Yilan G., Kadirgan M.A.N., Çiftçioğlu G.A., Analysis of electricity generation options for sustainable energy decision making: The case of Turkey. "Renewable Energy" 146 (2020), 519-529.
• You F., Tao L., Graziano D.J., Snyder S.W., Optimal design of sustainable cellulosic biofuel supply chains: Multiobjective optimization coupled with life cycle assessment and input-output analysis. "AIChE Journal" 58, (2012), 1157-1180.
• Falcone P.M., González García S., Imbert E., Lijó L., Moreira M.T., Tani A., Tartiu V.E., Morone P., Transitioning towards the bio-economy: Assessing the social dimension through a stakeholder lens. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management" 26 (2019), 1135-1153.
• Yıldız-Geyhan E., Yılan G., Altun-Çiftçioğlu G.A., Kadırgan M.A.N., Environmental and social life cycle sustainability assessment of different packaging waste collection systems. "Resources Conservation and Recycling" 143 (2019), 119-132.
• Millward-Hopkins J., Busch J., Purnell P., Zwirner O., Velis C.A., Brown A., Hahladakis J., Iacovidou E., Fully integrated modelling for sustainability assessment of resource recovery from waste. "Science of the Total Environment" 612 (2018), 613-624.
• Antonino M., Gutiérrez T.N., Baustert P., Benetto E., Implementation of Agent-Based Models to support Life Cycle Assessment: A review focusing on agriculture and land use. "AIMS Agriculture and Food" 3 (2018), 535-560.
• Niero M., Kalbar P.P., Coupling material circularity indicators and life cycle based indicators: A proposal to advance the assessment of circular economy strategies at the product level. "Resources Conservation and Recycling" 140 (2019), 305-312.
• Elia V., Gnoni M.G., Tornese F., Measuring circular economy strategies through index methods: A critical analysis. "Journal of Cleaner Production" 142 (2017), 2741-2751.
• Mesa J., Esparragoza I., Maury H., Developing a set of sustainability indicators for product families based on the circular economy model. "Journal of Cleaner Production" 196 (2018), 1429-1442.
• Parchomenko A., Nelen D., Gillabel J., Rechberger H., Measuring the circular economy - A Multiple Correspondence Analysis of 63 metrics. "Journal of Cleaner Production" 210 (2019), 200-216.
• Lazarevic D., Brandao M., Prospects for the circular economy and conclusions. in: Handbook of the Circular Economy, Edward Elgar, 2020.
• Korhonen J., Nuur C., Feldmann A., Birkie S.E., Circular economy as an essentially contested concept. "Journal of Cleaner Production" 175 (2018), 544-552.
• Charonis G., Degrowth, steady state economics and the circular economy: Three distinct yet increasingly converging alternative discourses to economic growth for achieving environmental sustainability and social equity. in: World Economic Association Sustainability Conference, 2012.
• Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2015) Growth within: A Circular Economy Vision for a Competitive Europe. Available: https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/publications/growth-within-a-circular-economy-visionfor-a-competitive-europe [accessed June 6, 2020].
• Kovacic Z., Strand R., Völker T., The Circular Economy in Europe: Critical Perspectives on Policies and Imaginaries, Routledge, 2020.
• European Commission (2014) Towards a circular economy: A zero waste programme for Europe. Available: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:aa88c66d-4553-11e4-a0cb- 01aa75ed71a1.0022.03/DOC_1&format=PDF [accessed June 6, 2020].
• Youn C., Kim S.Y., Lee Y., Choo H.J., Jang S., Jang J.I., Measuring retailers' sustainable development. "Business Strategy and the Environment" 26 (2017), 385-398.
• Ruiz-Real J.L., Uribe-Toril J., Gázquez-Abad J.C., Valenciano J. de P. Sustainability and retail: Analysis of global research. "Sustainability" 11 (2018), 14.
• Schindehutte M., Morris M.H., Kocak A., Understanding market-driving behavior: the role of entrepreneurship. "Journal of Small Business Management" 46 (2008), 4-26.
• Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2020) The Covid-19 recovery requires a resilient circular economy. Available at:https://medium.com/circulatenews/the-covid-19-recovery-requires-a-resilient-circular-economye385a3690037[accessed June 2, 2020].
• Bergek A., Jacobsson S., Carlsson B., Lindmark S., Rickne A., Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy 37 (2008), 407-429.
• Hekkert M.P., Suurs R.A.A., Negro S.O., Kuhlmann S., Smits R.E.H.M. Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. "Technological Forecasting and Social Change" 74 (2007), 413-432.
• Jacobsson S., Bergek A., Innovation system analyses and sustainability transitions: Contributions and suggestions for research. "Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions" 1 (2011), 41-57.
• Hacking N., Pearson P., Eames M., Mapping innovation and diffusion of hydrogen fuel cell technologies: Evidence from the UK's hydrogen fuel cell technological innovation system, 1954-2012. "International Journal of Hydrogen Energy" 44 (2019), 29805-29848.
• [van Welie M.J., Truffer B., Yap X-S., Towards sustainable urban basic services in low-income countries: A Technological Innovation System analysis of sanitation value chains in Nairobi. "Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions" 33 (2019), 196-214.
• Sawulski J., Gałczyński M., Zajdler R., Technological innovation system analysis in a follower country - the case of offshore wind in Poland. "Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions" 33 (2019), 249-267.
• Bilali H-E., Transition heuristic frameworks in research on agro-food sustainability transitions. Environment, "Development and Sustainability" 22 (2020), 1693-1728.
• Kushnir D., Hansen T., Vogl V., Åhman M., Adopting hydrogen direct reduction for the Swedish steel industry: A technological innovation system (TIS) study. "Journal of Cleaner Production" 242 (2020), 118185.

Identyfikatory

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32933/ActaInnovations.36.1