PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2021 | 1 (29) | 7--17
Tytuł artykułu

Empirical Verification of the Occurrence of Lucas Paradox in the Region of Central - Eastern Europe

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The purpose of this article is to study the occurrence of the Lucas paradox in the region of Central-Eastern Europe. According to the research conducted by Robert Lucas (1990), the direction of the international capital flows is different than the neoclassical theory suggests. The capital does not flow from the richer, high-income economies to the poorer, but rather stays in those with the higher capital resources or flows to the other ones with similar level of GDP. The paper verifies whether the paradox appears in the region, in the way that it examines the impact of the GDP on the FDI inflows. Additionally, the study implements few basic models with factors that may potentially resolve the puzzle of the capital flows. The study method is based on panel data estimations, initially using pooled OLS, and subsequently using fixed or random effects models as appropriate. The examined economies are the member states of the European Union, from the region of Central-Eastern Europe, and the examined years are 2000-2018. Based on the literature, and the widely emphasized need for differentiating between the types of international capital flows, the article focus is on the foreign direct investment only, as they constitute large part of the whole global capital flows. Results of the research confirm the presence of the paradox in the region in the examined period. Even though the estimation of the additional models helps to remove the effects of the paradox for the region, it does not fully explain under which circumstances the neoclassical theory would be applicable. None of the applied models reverses the sign of the GDP variable to negative, keeping it statistically significant at the same time. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
7--17
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego
Bibliografia
  • Akhtaruzzaman, M., Hajzler, C. and Owen, P.D. (2016). Does institutional quality resolve the Lucas Paradox? University of Otago Economics Discussion Papers, 1611, pp. 1-37, https://ourarchive.otago.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10523/7026/DP_1611.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y [Accessed 23.02.2021].
  • Alfaro, L., Kalemli-Ozcan, S. and Volosovych, V. (2005). Why doesn't capital flow from rich to poor countries? An empirical investigation. NBER Working Paper Series, 11901, pp. 1-67, https://www.nber.org/papers/w11901.pdf [Accessed 23.02.2021].
  • Hausmann, R. and Fernandez-Arias, E. (2000), Foreign Direct Investment: Good Cholesterol? Inter-American Development Bank, Working Papers, 417, pp. 1-46, https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/87989/1/idb-wp_417.pdf [Accessed 23.02.2021].
  • Keskinsoy, B. (2017), Lucas paradox in The Long Run. MPRA Working Papers, 78126, pp. 1-24, https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/78126/1/MPRA_paper_78126.pdf [Accessed 23.02.2021].
  • Kinda, T. (2010), Increasing private capital flows to developing countries: The role of physical and financial infrastructure in 58 countries, 1970-2003. Applied Econometrics and International Development, 10-2, pp. 57-72, https://www.usc.gal/economet/reviews/aeid1025.pdf [Accessed 23.02.2021].
  • Lucas, R. E., (1990). Why doesn't capital flow from rich to poor countries? American Economic Review, 80(2), pp. 92-96, https://www.fep.up.pt/docentes/pcosme/s-e-1/13-AER-80-2.pdf [Accessed 23.02.2021].
  • Schularick, M., and Steger, T.M. (2008), The Lucas Paradox and the quality of institutions: Then and now. Diskussionsbeitrage, 2008/3, pp. 1-14, https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/28069/1/56007509X.PDF [Accessed 23.02.2021].
  • UNCTAD, (2020). Foreign direct investment: Inward and outward flows and stock, annual, https://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/ReportFolders/reportFolders.aspx [Accessed 30.01.2020].
  • van Wijnbergen, S., and Franken, C. (2010), Private Capital Flows to Low Income Countries: Country-Specific Effects and the Lucas Paradox. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, 10-003/2, pp. 1-41, https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/86853/1/10-003.pdf [Accessed 23.02.2021].
  • World Bank, (2020a). World Development Indicators: GDP per capita, https://databank.worldbank.org/reports.aspx?source=2&series=NY.GDP.PCAP.CD&country= [Accessed 31.01.2020].
  • World Bank, (2020b). Worldwide Governance Indicators: Institutional Quality, Regulatory Quality: Percentile Rank, https://databank.worldbank.org/Institutional-Quality/id/98e680fc [Accessed 31.01.2020].
  • World Bank, (2020c). World Development Indicators: Trade (% of GDP), https://databank.worldbank.org/reports.aspx?source=2&series=NE.TRD.GNFS.ZS&country= [Accessed 31.01.2020].
  • World Bank, (2020d). Worldwide Governance Indicators: Institutional Quality, Government Effectiveness: Percentile Rank, January 31, 2020, https://databank.worldbank.org/Institutional-Quality/id/98e680fc [Accessed 31.01.2020].
  • World Bank, (2021). World Development Indicators: Labor force with advanced education, https://databank.worldbank.org/reports.aspx?source=2&series=SE.XPD.TOTL.GD.ZS&country=
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171619144

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.