Wyniki wyszukiwania - BazEkon

1

Polski esej literacki. Antologia. Wstęp i opracowanie Jan Tomkowski

100%

Tatarowski K. W.

|

nr 4 (71)

179-181

Antologia "Polski esej literacki", stanowi reprezentatywny wybór tekstów twórców -w zdecydowanej większości pisarzy, ale także historyków (Paweł Jasienica), literaturoznawców(Mieczysław Brahmer), dziennikarzy (Stanisław Wasylewski) czy pisarzy i publicystów niedocenionych przez współczesnych i wyrzuconych poza obręb głównego nutu życia literackiego swojej epoki (Julian Kaliszewski), którzy sięgali do tego gatunku literackiego. Książkę przygotował i poprzedził obszernym, erudycyjnym wstępem Jan Tomkowski, sam wyśmienity eseista, autor - oprócz licznych opracowań akademickich obejmujących historię literatury polskiej i powszechnej - Domu chińskiego mędrca, Don Juana we mgle, esejów o sztuce, samotności i wierności. A także monograficznych szkiców poświęconych największym postaciom w literaturze światowej i narodowej, począwszy od Williama Blake'a i Juliusza Słowackiego, aż po twórców XX-wiecznej powieści. Eseistyce poświęcił wiele uwagi, również w swoich wcześniejszych pracach naukowych. (fragment tekstu)

2

La saggistica degli scrittori ed. Anna Dolfi Bulzoni Editore, Roma 2012

100%

Orłowska P.

|

nr 2 (61)

170-173

The book La saggistica degli scrittori (The writers' essay writing)1 edited by the Italian scholar Anna Dolfi provides a remarkable standpoint for scholars interested in the study of essay as literary form conveying both scientifi c, journalistic, and artistic substance. The book includes a collection of analyses dedicated to some famous contemporary novelists and poets. It examines the manner in which each of them (for instance: Raymond Queneau, Emilio Gadda, Pier Paolo Pasolini or Italo Calvino, which were not only or not chiefl y essayists) handled the essay writing. Therefore, the collection of papers gathered by Anna Dolfi apprises the marginal aspects of the creative work of chosen writers and renders crucial what is ordinarily thought as secondary in their artistic lives - the essay writing. (fragment of text)

3

Esej naukowy jako podstawowa forma wypowiedzi studenta - różnice między brytyjskim a polskim systemem edukacji wyższej w podejściu do krótkich prac pisemnych

75%

Hacaga M.

|

nr 2 (48)

145-158

Współczesna gospodarka, oparta na usługach, wymaga od absolwentów szkół wyższych umiejętności sprawnego komunikowania się nie tylko w mowie, lecz także pisemnie. W polskim szkolnictwie wyższym, poza przygotowaniem prac dyplomowych, obszarowi temu poświęca się niewiele zainteresowania. Dla odróżnienia, w wyższym szkolnictwie brytyjskim esej stanowi jedno z podstawowych narzędzi nauczania i sprawdzania wiedzy. W artykule przedstawiono formy wykorzystania eseju w London School of Economics. Następnie przedstawiono problemy, z którymi jest związane jego potencjalne upowszechnienie w Polsce oraz sposoby ich rozwiązania.(abstrakt oryginalny)

4

George Douglas Atkins. Tracing the essay: through experience to truth University of Georgia Press, Athens and London 2005, 180 p., ISBN-13: 978-0820327877.

75%

Orłowska P.

|

nr 4 (59)

191-193

Although the George Douglas Atkins' study entitled Tracing the essay: through experience to truth was published several years ago and it does not represent an editorial newness, it still deserves consideration. It is one of the most complex and thorough researches dedicated to the comprehension and the exposition of this 'formless form', that is to say the essay. Nevertheless, the Polish scientifi c reviews did not give the Prof. Atkins study attention it merits - a gap we are willing to fill in. Atkins is Professor at the University of Virginia. He considers himself as a scholar, a non-specialist, an essayist and a critic rather than a literature expert. Even though in the last few years he has examined in depth the works of E.B. White and T.S. Eliot, the essence of the essay has constituted the center of his academic interests. The book we are presenting represents his most important achievement in this scientific field.(fragment of text)

5

"Dwunastu gniewnych ludzi" - wiarygodność a realizm narracji

75%

Baliński P.

Master of Business Administration

|

2005

|

nr 5 (76)

45-51

Codziennie dociera do nas ogromna ilość informacji. Często bywa tak, że choć nawet nie jesteśmy w stanie zbadać ich wiarygodności, to musimy się do nich ustosunkować lub je ocenić. Zdarza się, że na ich podstawie podejmujemy decyzje. Przyzwyczajeni do przyczynowo-skutkowego postrzegania świata, tworzymy historie, których podstawowym zadaniem jest usunięcie chaosu informacyjnego oraz sprawienie, by docierające dane były sensowne. Niniejszy esej jest przykładem tego typu narracji. Przedstawiam w nim wygodny w użyciu psychologiczny model, jakim posłużę się w analizie danych, które - przynajmniej na pierwszy rzut oka - trudno połączyć w racjonalną całość. (fragment tekstu)

6

Czy internet jest szansą na powrót do demokracji bezpośredniej?

63%

Galewski T.

|

2005

|

11

|

nr 1077

154-175

Celem artykułu jest ukazanie zmian zachodzących w sferze politycznej. Przedstawiono pojęcie demokracji oraz jej wady. Spróbowano również odpowiedzieć na pytanie zawarte w tytule publikacji- czy rzeczywiście jest możliwy powrót do demokracji bezpośredniej za pomocą Internetu?

7

Rejoinder to the Motivation of Business Leaders in Socialist and Marketbased Systems by Péter Mihályi

51%

Maziarz M.

|

3 (17)

|

nr 3

151-154

This rejoinder has the following two aims. First, Mihalyi's analysis is further developed and shown that, in spite of the common motivation across the two economic systems, the behaviour of business leaders can lead to divergent results. Namely, certain managerial decisions can create a disequilibrium mechanism leading to recessions. Second, the current state of macroeconomics is commented upon.(fragment of text)

8

Rejoinder to Comparative Economics and the Mainstream by László Csaba

51%

Vergara-Fernández M.

|

3 (17)

|

nr 3

138-142

Throughout the paper, as the title might suggest, there is running commentary with respect to the relationship between Kornai's work and 'mainstream economics'. The underlying question throughout the paper is why Kornai's work did not become more influential in the mainstream, if Kornai offered all the necessary ingredients mfor his work to become more recognised than it has actually been. Csaba's concern is that "Given his unparalleled embeddedness in the Western academic world ever since the mid-1960s...his highly original and equally unusually influential ideas have had a limited, if any, impact on mainstream economics, as taught in global economics programmes at PhD level". Csaba's narrative suggests that there was a kind of progression in Kornai's work that should have made him acceptable to the mainstream, but that, in the end, his "subject nof analysis as well as the conditions under which the author formulated his academic interests... kept him within the confines of institutional economics". Due to space limitations I will only focus on two aspects that are important from the perspective of the philosophy of economics. (fragment of text)

9

Rejoinder to Kalecki - a Pioneer of Modern Macroeconomics by Jerzy Osiatyński

51%

Bludnik I.

|

3 (17)

|

nr 3

135-137

The aforementioned article by Jerzy Osiatyński provides the readers with an insight into the achievements of Michał Kalecki, one of the most outstanding Polish economists, whose work appears to be as up to date now as it was in the 1930s, when the Keynesian revolution was planting the roots of modern macroeconomics. Osiatyński focuses mainly on Kalecki's contribution to macroeconomic studies in the cyclical fluctuations and economic dynamics of the capitalist economy, recalling the impact that these have had on the evolution of heterodox Keynesianism. It is visible scepticism regarding the influence of Kalecki's works on the developments of Keynesian theory. (fragment of text)

10

Rejoinder to Perspectival Representation in DSGE Models by Paweł Kawalec

45%

Kolasa M.

|

3 (17)

|

nr 3

148-150

In this short rejoinder I am going to share my own views on the current stance and prospects for DSGE models, drawing from my experience as a researcher and central bank economist. It is useful to start from a proposition that DSGE models are a compromise between rigorous academic research and policy makers' pragmatism. The former favors relatively small models, where key mechanisms can be clearly understood. The structure ideally includes only those ingredients that are necessary for exposing these mechanisms, and its validation uses only a narrow set of data that the model seeks to explain. It very often does not make sense to apply such models to address questions that are too distant from the ones originally asked. In other words, academic models are usually quite specialized, even in macroeconomic applications, and despite the fact that their very core, consisting of a description of household preferences or production technology, might be highly standardized. (fragment of text)

11

Rejoinder to Evidence and the Micro-Foundations of Economic Growth by Michael Joffe

45%

Hamilton E.

|

3 (17)

|

nr 3

143-147

This is a response to Joffe (this issue) and aims to demonstrate that economics needs theory that is developed in collaboration with real-world data and that approaches utilised in other disciplines may be transferred to enable this goal. Building better theory will enable improved explanation of economic phenomena to aid the understanding of causation in interacting systems. In turn, this will allow more effective application to policy problems as such theory can inform intervention within these systems. With poor theory, data collection, analysis and interpretation can all be misdirected and misleading. This paper has suggested carrying out multimethod research, combining within-case analysis and cross-case analysis. The within-case in-depth study can provide evidence of causal mechanisms while the cross-case analysis can demonstrate the distribution of causal patterns. Additionally, set-theoretic within-case and cross-case methods are proposed, as they enable the analysis of mechanisms and 'conjunctural causation', both characteristics of causal systems. (fragment of text)

12

Rejoinder to Methodology...?! Why? Some Methodological Aspects of the Controversy between Mainstream Economics and Institutionalism by Peter Galbács

45%

Stępień B.

|

3 (17)

|

nr 3

155-158

This question, and the rejoinder itself, were inspired by the article of Peter Galbacs, in which he claims that the reason mainstream and heterodox economics cannot converge their perspectives is the methodology we employ. But do the distant methodological standpoints preclude convergence? The answer to these questions depends, for me, on a clarification of the following areas in this long - going, active, but still unresolved dispute: 1. the way we define, treat and use the methodology in our reasoning, 2. the way we justify the choice of assumptions serving as the methodological restraint, 3. the way we understand and operationalize rationality. (fragment of text)