PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Czasopismo
2022 | 11(3-4) | 1--5
Tytuł artykułu

Trends in Argumentation Logic

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
In this paper, we introduce the subject of the special issue Trends in Argumentation Logic. Here we mainly describe two approaches to argumentation logic with explicating monotonic and non-monotonic, or defeasible, reasoning and explain the role of artificial intelligence in applying argumentation logic. Then we give a short overview of the papers contributed to the special issue. Keywords: Aristotle, artificial intelligence, argumentation logic, monotonic reasoning, defeasible reasoning.(original abstract)
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
1--5
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • National Technical University of Athens, Greece
  • Saint Petersburg National Research University of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics, Russia
  • University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow
Bibliografia
  • Alchourrón, C., P. Gärdenfors, D. Makinson, On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions, Journal of Symbolic Logic 50, 1985, pp. 510-530.
  • Almpani, S., Y. Kiouvrekis, P. Stefaneas, P. Frangos, Computational Argumentation for Medical Device Regulatory Classification, International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools 31, 2022, DOI: 10.1142/S0218213022500051
  • Barbashina, E., E. Lisanyuk, Leon Petrażycki on Norms and Their Logical Study, Studia Humana 7: 4, 2018, pp. 30-38.
  • Dung, P.M., On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming, and n-person games, Artificial Intelligence 77, 1995, pp. 321-357.
  • Eemeren van, F.H., R. Grootendorst, A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The Pragma- dialectical Approach, Cambridge University Press, 2004.
  • Gabbay, D. M., K. Schlechta, A New Perspective on Nonmonotonic Logics, Springer International Publishing AG, 2016.
  • Kirillova, N., E. Lisanyuk, Truth and legal argumentation in Fyodor Dostoevsky's, The Karamazov Brothers, Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science 48, 2019, pp. 193-204.
  • Lisanyuk, E., Argumentation, Pavilionis's meaning continuum and the Kitchen Debate, Problemos 88, 2015, pp. 95-113.
  • Lisanyuk E. Logical theories of rational behavior, law and argumentation [Лoгiчнi тeopiї pацioнальнoї пoвeдiнки, пpавo i аpгумeнтацiя], Philosophy of law and contemporary theory of law [Фiлocoфiя пpава i загальна тeopiя пpава] 1-2, 2014, pp. 148-159, in Ukrainian.
  • Pollock, J. L., Defeasible Reasoning and Degrees of Justification, Argument and Computation 1 (1), 2010, pp. 7-22.
  • Prakken, H., Formalising debates about law-making proposals as practical reasoning, [in:] M. Araszkiewicz, K. Pleszka (eds.), Logic in the Theory and Practice of Lawmaking. Legisprudence Library Series, Springer, 2015.
  • Schumann, A. Did the Neo-Babylonians construct a Symbolic Logic for legal proceedings? Journal of Applied Logics - IfCoLog Journal of Logics and Their Applications 6: 1, 2019, pp. 31- 82.
  • Schumann, A. Archaeology of Logic, Taylor & Francis Group, 2023.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171659622

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.