Innovation Management in Good Practice Context

• Autorzy: Pavel Fobel , Tomáš Forgon , Monika Klimentová Fobelová
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The issue of innovation has also been pursued in social sciences and subsequently specifically in the field of application of socio-scientific knowledge. It is not just about professional engineering ethics but we perceive it in a complex and wider social context. Doing good as well as good practice are more than the professional code of ethics or an effort for technical or managerial excellence. Innovative changes should not be parameterized solely by economic efficiency or performance. With regard to new knowledge and technology development, their ethical aspects become more important and focus more on good life. In the context of social sciences with interdisciplinary trends, applied ethics and its subdisciplines (professional ethics, business ethics, ethics of science and research) can take over and play an important practical role. Innovative processes are increasingly becoming the focus of applied ethics, especially in terms of ethical risks. Our mission is to offer an interdisciplinary view of innovation as discussed in the ethics aspect. Based on these considerations, we conclude that ethics need to be integrated into individual innovation processes and adopted as an important condition for eliminating (mitigating) social risks. In our theoretical considerations we offer a view of the scientific risks and forms of prevention related to innovative change in important areas including engineering practice or health protection. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Innovations; Innovations in production; Ethics

PL

Innowacje; Innowacje w produkcji; Etyka

• Czasopismo: Management Systems in Production Engineering
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: 27
• Numer: nr 2
• Strony: 69--73

Twórcy

autor

Pavel Fobel

• Silesian University of Technology, Zabrze; University of Matej Bel, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia

autor

Tomáš Forgon

• University of Matej Bel, Banská Bystrica

autor

Monika Klimentová Fobelová

• BB CAE, Slovak Republic

Bibliografia

• AIFP. Asociacia Inovativneho Farmaceutickeho Priemyslu. Internet: http://www.aifp.sk/sk/etika/, Dec. 5, 2013 [Dec. 26, 2018].
• U. Beck. Riziková společnosť. Na ceste k jiné moderně. Praha: SLON, 2004.
• F.P. Drucker. Innovation and Entrepreneurship. New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 1985.
• P. Fobel et al. Organizačná etika a profesionálne poradenstvo. Banska Bystrica: Žiar nad Hronom, 2013, p. 43.
• A. Giddens. Důsledky modernity. Praha: SLON, 1988.
• A. Kuzior. "Development of competences key to sustainable development". Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej. Organizacja i Zarządzanie, z. 75, pp. 71-81, 2014.
• G. Lipovetsky. Soumrak povinnosti. Praha: Vydavateľstvo Prostror, 1999.
• R. Rorty. "Philosophy's Role Vis-a-vis Business Ethics". Business Ethics Quarterly, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 369-380, 2006.
• P. Singer. Spisy o etickom žití. Bratislava: Vydavateľstvo spolku slovenskych spisovateľov, 2000.
• L. Tondl. Hodnoty, komunikácia, múdrosť: Výber vedeckých diel od Ladislava Tondla pre aplikovanú etiku. Banska Bystrica: Vydavateľstvo Univerzita Mateja Bela Belianum, 2014.
• L.K. Trevino and M.E. Brown. "Managing to be ethical: Debunkingfive business ethics myths". Academy of Management Executive, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 69-81, 2004.
• J. Linhart, M. Petrusek, A. Vodakova and H. Mařikova. Velký sociologický slovník. Praha: Vydavateľstvo Karolinum, 1996.
• P.H. Werhane. "A Place for Philosophers in Applied Ethics and the Role of Moral Reasoning in Moral Imagination: A Response to Richard Rorty". Business Ethics Quarterly, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 381-389, 2006.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1515/mspe-2019-0011