Otvetstvennostʹ za opravdanie genocida, prestupleniâ protiv čelovečestva, prestupleniâ protivmira i voennogo prestupleniâ v ugolovnom zakone Latvijskoj Respubliki

• Autorzy: Eriks Trels

Warianty tytułu

Odpowiedzialność za uniewinnienie od zbrodni ludobójstwa, zbrodni przeciwko ludzkości, zbrodni przeciwko pokojowi i zbrodni wojennych w prawie karnym Republiki Łotewskiej

Liability for Acquittal of Genocide, Crime Against Humanity, Crime Against Peace and War Crime in the Criminal Law of the Republic of Latvia

• Języki publikacji: RU

Abstrakty

EN

According to the Section 1 of the Council of European Union Framework Decision 2008/913/JHA on combating certain forms and expressions of racism and xenophobia by means of criminal law, each Member State shall take the measures necessary to ensure that the following intentional conduct is punishable: publicly condoning, denying or grossly trivialising crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes. Section 74.1 "Acquittal of Genocide, Crime against Humanity" of the Criminal Law provides for liability in the public glorification of genocide, crime against humanity, crime against peace or war crime or glorification, denial, acquittal or gross trivialisation of committed genocide, crime against humanity, crime against peace or war crime, including genocide, crime against humanity, crime against peace or war crime committed by the U.S.S.R. or Nazi Germany against the Republic of Latvia and its inhabitants. The article aims to initiate a debate on potential problems related to the application of the Section 74.1 "Acquittal of Genocide, Crime against Humanity" of the Criminal Law. The author offers his vision of the regulatory framework application problems. (original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Genocide; War crimes; Criminal Law

PL

Ludobójstwo; Zbrodnie wojenne; Prawo karne

• Czasopismo: De Securitate et Defensione. O Bezpieczeństwie i Obronności
• Rocznik: 2019
• Numer: nr 2
• Strony: 8--31

Twórcy

autor

Eriks Trels

• Ministry of the Interior of Latvia; State Police College; Riga Stradins University

Bibliografia

• Агапов Павел Валерьевич. 2007. Публичные призывы к осуществлению террористической деятельности или публичное оправдание терроризма: анализ законодательной новации. Уголовное право № 1: 4-6. [Agapov Pavel Valeryevich. 2007. Publichniye prizivi k osushchestvleniyu terroristicheskoy deyatelnosti ili publichnoye opravdaniye terrorizma: analizē zakonodatelnoy novacii. Ugolovnoye pravo № 1: 4-6].
• Багдасарян Вардан Эрнестович, Сулакшин Степан Степанович. 2017. Современный фашизм: новые облики и проявления. Москва: Наука и политика. [Bagdasaryan Vardan Ernestovich, Sulakshin Stepan Stepanovich. 2017. Sovremenniy fashism: noviye obliki i proyavleniya. Moskva: Nauka i politika.].
• Даль Владимир Иванович. 1880-1882. Толковый словарь живого великорусского языка. В четырех томах.Санкт-Петербург, Москва: Товарищество Маврикия Осиповича Вольфа. [Dall Vladimir Ivanovich. 1880-1882. Tolkoviy slovar zivogo velikorusskogo yazika. V chetireh tomah. Sankt-Peterburg, Moskva: Tovarishchestvo Mavrikiya Osipovicha Volfa].
• Егорова Наталья Александровна. 2015. Реабилитация нацизма: уголовно-правовой анализ. Криминологический журнал Байкальского государственного университета экономики и права. Том 9. Nr.3: 494-503. [Yegorova Natalya Alexandrovna. 2015. Reabilitaciyanacizma: ugolovno-pravovoyanaliz. Kriminalogicheskiy zurnal Baikalskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki I prava. Tom 9. Nr.3: 494-503].
• Заявление в Европейский суд по правам человека от 28 февраля 2017 г. по делу «Владимир Владимирович Лузгин против России» (Vladimir Vladimirovich Luzgin v. Russia) Nr.17942/17. // https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng

Identyfikatory

DOI

doi.org/10.34739/dsd.2019.02.01