Effectivity of Public International Lawa Need for Paradigm Change

• Autorzy: Sopio Kiladze
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Last century was significant for public international law, which has developed rapidly, bringing some improvements in protecting human rights despite the fact it faces huge challenges regarding its effectivity. On the one hand, the whole international community agrees on such values as a ban of use of force and peaceful settlement of international disputes or human rights, but on the other hand, there are international armed conflicts that cause some of the gravest human rights violations of the 21st century. The purpose of the article is to scruti-nize and identify ways through which public international law can become more effective in order to realize common values of international community enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations. Through descriptive, normative, and critical methods of research, the article attempts to show that there is a need for a paradigm change in order to make public interna-tional law more effective. But what should the new paradigm be? How can the effectivity of the public international law be increased? To answer these questions, the detailed inspection of the term of effectivity, as well as creation and the enforcement processes of the public international law norms, is needed. Research shows common consent of states, a legitimate constitutive act, authority, as well as appropriate enforcement, are pillars, based on which the public international law can uphold its effect. And some international actors should take a lead on forming a new paradigm in international law in order to make a more effective international legal order happen. However, it will take some time.(original abstract)

Słowa kluczowe

EN

International law; Public sector; State; Administrative sanction

PL

Prawo międzynarodowe; Sektor publiczny; Państwo; Sankcje administracyjne

• Czasopismo: Torun International Studies
• Rocznik: 2022
• Numer: nr 1(15)
• Strony: 5--23

Twórcy

autor

Sopio Kiladze

• Grigol Robakidze University

Bibliografia

• Aust, A. (2005). Handbook of International Law. Cambridge University Press.
• Besson, S. (2009). The Authority in International Law - Lifting the State Veil, Sydney Law Review, 31, 343-380.
• Burchill, R. (2001). Developing International Law of Democracy. Modern Law Review, 64, 123-134. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1097142
• d'Aspermont, J. (2014). Effectivity in International Law: Self-Empowerment Against Epistemological Claustrophobia. American Society of International Law, 108, 165-168. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2398772300001963
• d'Aspermont, J. (2015). The Collective Security System and the Enforcement of International Law: Or the Catharsis of Austinian Imperatival Complex of International Lawyers. In M. Weiler (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law (pp. 129-156). Oxford University Press.
• Dinstein, Y. (1966). Par in Parem Non Habet Imperium. Israel Law Review, 1(3), 407-420. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223700013893
• Chayes, A., & Handler Chayes, A. (1995). The New Sovereignty Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements. Harvard University Press.
• Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly. (2021). Implementation of Judgements of the European Court of Human Rights. Resolution 2358.
• Egede, E., & Sutch, P. (2013). The Politics of International Law and International Justice. Edinburgh University Press.
• Finnemore, M. (1996). National Interests in International Society. Cornell University Press.
• Fitzmaurice, G. (1956). The Foundations of the Authority of International Law and the Problem of Enforcement. Modern Law Review, 19(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1956.tb00340.x
• Frank, T.M. (1995). Fairness of International Institutions. Clarendon Press.
• Goldsmith, J.L., & Posner, E.A. (2005). The Limits of International Law. Oxford University Press.
• Giddens, A. (2000). Runaway World: How Globalization Reshaping Our Lives. Routledge.
• Gray, C.D. (2008). International Law and Use of Force. Oxford University Press.
• Guzman, A.T. (2008). How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory. Oxford University Press.
• Held, D., McGrew, E., Goldblatt, D., & Perraton, J. (1999). Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Global Culture. Polity Press.
• Hirsch, M. (2004). Compliance with International Norms in the Age of Globalization: Two Theoretical Perspectives. In E. Benvenisti, & M. Hirsch (Eds.), Impact of International Law on International Cooperation: Theoretical Perspectives (pp. 166-193). Cambridge University Press.
• Hurrell, A. (1993). International Society and the Study of Regimes: A Reflective Approach. In V. Rittberger, & P. Mayer (Eds.), Regime Theory and International Relations. Clarendon Press.
• International Law Commission. (2006). Conclusion of the Work of the Study Group on the Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties arising from the Diversification and Expansion of the International Law. UN Doc A/61/10.
• Jellinek, G. (1914). Allgemeine Staatslehre. 3. Aufl. O. Häring.
• Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, E. (2020). The Enforcement of International Law. In M.O. Hosli, & J. Selleslaghs (Eds.), The Changing Global Order: Challenges and Prospects (pp. 361-384). Springer.
• Katselli Proukaki, E. (2010). The Problem of Enforcement of Public International Law: Countermeasures, Non-Injured States and the Idea of International Community. Routledge.
• Kelsen, H. (2003). The Principles of International Law. The Lawbook Exchange.
• Kläger, R. (2011). Fair and Equitable Treatment in International Investment Law. Cambridge University Press.
• Koh, H.H. (1997). Why Do Nations Obey International Law? Yale Law Journal, 106(8), 2599-2660. https://doi.org/10.2307/797228
• Koskenniemi, M. (1990). The Politics of International Law. European Journal of International Law, 1(4), 4-32. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.ejil.a035781
• Koskenniemi M. (2007). The Fate of Public International Law: Between Techniques and Politics. Modern Law Review, 70(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00624.x
• Kunz, J.L. (1950). Sanctions in International Law. American Journal of International Law, 54 (2), 324-348. https://doi.org/10.2307/2195251
• McDoughal, M.S., & Feliciano, F.P. (1959). Legal Regulation of Resort to International Coercion: Aggression and Self-Defense in Policy Perspective. Yale Law Journal, 68(6), 1057-1166. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/14490
• Noortmann, M. (2005). Enforcing International Law: From Self-Help to Self-Contained Regimes. Routledge.
• Nussbaum, A. (1954). A Concise History of the Law of Nations. MacMillan.
• O'Connell, M.E. (2008). The Power and Purpose of International Law: Insights of Theory and Practice of Enforcement. Oxford University Press.
• Oppenheim, L. (1955). International Law: A Treatise. Vol 1, Peace. Longmans, Green & Co.
• Ratz, J. (1986). The Morality of Freedom. Clarendon Press.
• Roughan, M. (2016). Mind the Gaps: Authority and Legality in International Law. European Journal of International Law, 27, 329-352. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chw021
• Schweisfurth, T. (2006). Völkerrecht. Mohr Siebeck.
• Shaw, M.N. (2014). International Law. Vol 1. Cambridge University Press.
• Slaughter, A.M., & Burke-White, W.W. (2006). The Future of International Law is Domestic (or the European Way of Law). Harvard International Law Journal, 47(2), 327-352. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231942.001.0001
• Taki, H. (2021). Effectiveness. In R. Wolfrum (Ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Max Planc Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law. http://www.opil.ouplaw.com
• Thiele, C. (2008). Fragmentierung des Völkerrechts als Herausforderung fuer die Staatengemeinschaft. Archiv des Völkerrechts, 46(1), 1-41.
• Verdross, A., & Simma, B. (2010). Universelles Völkerrecht: Theorie und Praxis. Dunckler&Hublot.
• Vos, J.A. (2013). The Structure of Public International Law. Asser Press.
• Von Arnauld, A. (2014). Völkerrecht. CF Müller.
• Von Bogdandy, A. (2008). General Principles of International Public Authority: Sketching a research Field. German Law Journal, 9(11), 1909-1939. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200000699
• Von Bogdandy, A., Goldman, M., & Venzke, I. (2017). From Public International to International Public Law: Translating World Public Opinion into International Public Authority. European Journal of International Law, 28(1), 115-144. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chx002
• Wheatley, S. (2011). A Democratic Rule of International Law. European Journal of International Law, 22(2), 525-548. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chr022
• Whyte, J.D. (1987). Legality and Legitimacy: The Problem of Judicial Review of Legislation. Qeen's Law Journal, 12(1), 1-20.
• Yasuaki, O. (2003). International Law in and with International Politics: The Functions of International Law in International Politics. European Journal of International Law, 14(1), 105-131. http://www.ejil.org/pdfs/14/1/402.pdf

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12775/TIS.2022.001