PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2020 | 13 | nr 4 | 11--23
Tytuł artykułu

Power Attitudes and Stealing Behavior: Students' Senses of Social Norms and Responsibility

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Acts of taking money away from others and acts of reverting this behavior are investigated in an experimental survey that includes attitudinal questions concerning power and responsibility. Decisions to "steal or not" and "revert stealing or not" were made either before, or after the attitudinal questions. All possible individual combinations between stealing and reverting the stealing from others are frequently observed. Answering questions concerning power and responsibility beforehand leads to less stealing. People who believe that power is important in private relations, have a higher tendency to steal money from unknown others, and people who believe that power is important in public relations more often revert the stealing from others. Perceived powerlessness seems to increase stealing as well as reverting of others' stealing. Attitudes towards responsibility do not relate to these investigated behaviors. Individual values for social actions best describe the observed students' behavioral variation in social norm compliance. (original abstract)
Rocznik
Tom
13
Numer
Strony
11--23
Opis fizyczny
Twórcy
  • European University Viadrina, Frankfurt (Oder), Germany
  • European University Viadrina, Frankfurt (Oder), Germany
Bibliografia
  • Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: a theory of warm-glow giving. Economic Journal, 100(401), 464-477.
  • Ayal, S., Gino, F., Barkan, R., & Ariely, D. (2015). Three principles to revise people's unethical behavior. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(6), 738-741.
  • Babcock, L. & Loewenstein, G. (1997). Explaining bargaining impasse: The role of selfserving biases. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(1), 109-126.
  • Barkan, R., Ayal, S., Gino, F., & Ariely, D. (2012). The pot calling the kettle black: distancing response to ethical dissonance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(4), 757-773.
  • Belot, M. & Schröder, M. (2013). Sloppy work, lies and theft: A novel experimental design to study counterproductive behaviour. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 93, 233-238.
  • Bolle, F., Braham, M., & Steland, A. (1999). Differences in honesty in Europe? Remarks on 'measurment without theory.' Homo Oeconomicus 16(2), 205-218.
  • Bolle, F. & Otto P. E. (2010). A price is a signal: on intrinsic motivation, crowding-out and crowding-in. Kyklos 63(1), 9-22.
  • Bolle, F., Tan, J. H., & Zizzo, D. J. (2014). Vendettas. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 6(2), 93-130.
  • Charness, G. & Dufwenberg, M. (2010). Bare promises: An experiment. Economics Letters, 107(2), 281-283.
  • Elster, J. (1989). The cement of society: A survey of social order. Cambridge University Press.
  • Engel, C. (2018). Experimental criminal law: a survey of contributions from law, economics, and criminology. In: Empirical Legal Research in Action. (Eds: W. v. Boom, PT Desmet and P. Mascini). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Engel, C. & Nagin, D. (2015). Who is afraid of the stick? Experimentally testing the deterrent effect of sanction certainty. Review of Behavioral Economics, 2(4), 405-434.
  • Farrington, D. P. & Knight, B. J. (1979). Two non-reactive field experiments on stealing from a 'lost'letter. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18(3), 277-284.
  • Fehr, E. & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817-868.
  • Gilovich, T. (1990). Differential construal and the false consensus effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(4), 623-634.
  • Gneezy, U. (2005). Deception: The role of consequences. American Economic Review, 95(1), 384-394.
  • Gneezy, U., Imas, A., & Madarász, K. (2014). Conscience accounting: Emotion dynamics and social behavior. Management Science, 60(11), 2645-2658.
  • Gneezy, U. & Rustichini, A., 2000. Pay enough or don't pay at all. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 791-810.
  • Gravert, C. (2013). How luck and performance affect stealing. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 93, 301-304.
  • Grolleau, G., Kocher, M. G., & Sutan, A. (2016). Cheating and loss aversion: Do people cheat more to avoid a loss? Management Science, 62(12), 3428-3438.
  • Hermann, D. & Mußhoff, O. (2019). I might be a liar, but I am not a thief: An experimental distinction between the moral costs of lying and stealing. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 163, 135-139.
  • Jackson, D. (1967). PRF scoring manual. Research Psychologists Press.
  • Jones, S. C. (1973). Self- and interpersonal evaluations: esteem theories versus consistency theories. Psychological Bulletin, 79(3), 185-199.
  • Jordan, J., Mullen, E., & Murnighan, J. K. (2011). Striving for the moral self: The effects of recalling past moral actions on future moral behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(5), 701-713.
  • Kimbrough, E. O. & Vostroknutov, A. (2016). Norms make preferences social. Journal of the European Economic Association, 14(3), 608-638.
  • Koopmans, R. & Veit, S. (2014). Cooperation in ethnically diverse neighborhoods: A lost- letter experiment. Political Psychology, 35(3), 379-400.
  • Krupka, E. L. & Weber, R. A. (2013). Identifying social norms using coordination games: Why does dictator game sharing vary?. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(3), 495-524.
  • Levenson, H. (1973). Multidimensional locus of control in psychiatric patients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 41(3), 397-404.
  • López-Pérez, R. (2008). Aversion to norm-breaking: A model. Games and Economic Behavior, 64(1), 237-267.
  • Mazar, N., Amir, O., & Ariely, D. (2008). The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of selfconcept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(6), 633-644.
  • Merritt, A. C., Effron, D. A., & Monin, B. (2010). Moral self-licensing: When being good frees us to be bad. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(5), 344-357.
  • Milgram, S., Mann, L., & Harter, S. (1965). The lost-letter technique: A tool of social research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 29(3), 437-438.
  • Mullen, E. & Monin, B. (2016). Consistency versus licensing effects of past moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 363-385.
  • Otto, P. E. & Bolle, F. (2011). Multiple facets of altruism and their influence on blood donation. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40(5), 558-563.
  • Otto, P. E. & Bolle, F. (2015). Exploiting one's power with a guilty conscience: An experimental investigation of self-serving biases. Journal of Economic Psychology, 51, 79-89.
  • Pecenka, C. J., & Kundhlande, G. (2013). Theft in South Africa: An experiment to examine the influence of racial identity and inequality. The Journal of Development Studies, 49(5), 737-753.
  • Sachdeva, S., Iliev, R., & Medin, D. L. (2009). Sinning saints and saintly sinners: The paradox of moral self-regulation. Psychological Science, 20(4), 523-528.
  • Schildberg-Hörisch, H. & Strassmair, C. (2012). An experimental test of the deterrence hypothesis. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 28(3), 447-459.
  • Shalvi, S., Gino, F., Barkan, R., & Ayal, S. (2015). Self-serving justifications: Doing wrong and feeling moral. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(2), 125-130.
  • Vanaman, M., Leggett, M.-P., Crysel, L., & Askew, R. (2019). A novel measure of the need for moral cognition. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 41(1), 20-33.
  • Vanberg, C. (2008). Why do people keep their promises? An experimental test of two explanations. Econometrica, 76(6), 1467-1480.
  • Zizzo, D. J. (2004). Inequality and procedural fairness in a money burning and stealing experiment. Research on Economic Inequality, 11, 215-247.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171607611

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Zgłoszenie zostało wysłane

Musisz być zalogowany aby pisać komentarze.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.